Re: Actually...
@My-Handle
'I have never paid for a TV license. I've never had a TV that was in any condition to receive a signal (did have one for consoles though). I don't like the way that, as soon as I move into a new property, I am assumed by TV Licensing to be watching TV and that I owe them that fee, based on no evidence at all. Even after I follow their rules and tell them no, I don't watch TV, they decide to ignore that statement after an arbitrary period and begin sending letters threatening investigation, enforcers and legal action again. And, I will reiterate, on no evidence whatever of me committing a crime. I understand that TV licensing are not the BBC, but the two are irrevocably tied together, and behaviour like that does not make me inclined to stump up a fee of any kind out of sheer good will.'
I too go through this; I'm not license fee payer. I ignore all the letters from the BBC's fee collecting Gestapo and just wait for the 'inspector' to arrive. I let the person search my house (for a TV?) just to avoid hassle: I have to prove my innocence.
We have to consider a single person who owns their own home, and a TV. They lose their job. The only benefits they get is council tax and JSA which is £72.40 a week if they do not have savings above a small amount. £150 a year becomes a lot of food. So what do they do about that TV? It's proof that they are guilty of a criminal offense. Can they afford legal support? They will not be eligible for legal aid.
Overall, I do not have much against the BBC regarding their services; I use their news services on the internet and I listen to Radio 2 and 4. I do not trust the BBC Trust to fulfil their remit. The biggest issue for me is remuneration.