Re: This had to be DOS 1.0 or 1.1
The 86-DOS command for erasing files was "ERA" and most of the early versions of DOS would accept ERA as a valid command. I got a lot of strange looks when using ERA instead of DEL.
399 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jul 2009
IIRC, the benchmark started as an article in a 1981 issue of Byte written by a member of the San Diego Computer Society about their work on making a portable benchmark for microcomputers. The intent was to evaluate software (interpreters vs compilers and different languages) as much as to evaluate hardware. Source code for implementations in several languages were included in the article. A second article in a 1982 issue of Byte "Once More Through the Sieve", had results for more hardware and software combinations along with implementations in more languages. The upshot was compiled code ran much faster (typ 10X) than interpreted code, with interpreted COBOL being the loser. I remember writing Fortran code to run on an 8 MHz 8086 and finding out it ran twice as fast as compiled BASIC on the same hardware.
Early (1975 to ~1984) issues of Byte magazine, or other microcomputer magazines, are a trip to read as the future with micros seemed limitless.
I suspect the talker was in Houston where the local time at splashdown was 7:05PM. I was hoping for clear skies for the splashdown, but the usual SD area late afternoon clouds showed up blocking the view.
What amusing and/or alarming is that the USN had some practice with the medical evacuation of ISS a few months ago, where that team was taken directly to Scripps Memorial La Jolla in the wee hours of the morning.
The combination of radar controlling guns via analog computers and shells equipped with proximity fuses downed enough of the incoming V-1's to allow fighter planes to mop up a good fraction of the rest. OTOH, rockets don't have the problems of extreme acceleration inherent with cannons and could allow for a larger explosive charge. With a proximity fuse, the guided rocket just has to get close.
1987 not 1980 per the linked article.
The Wendin logo looks familiar, probably running across it in computer mags from the 1986-87. For even more trivia on multi-user/multi-tasking DOS, the literature for 86-DOS specifically mentioned a multi-user version and when DOS 2.0 came around, comments about the new device driver interface suggested some features were put in to support multi-tasking.
As for ASM coding, one of the big helps in understanding what's going was Stephen Morse's book on the 8086, specifically how some instructions were intended to be used.
I had a 2017 model MacBook Pro that just had 2 USB-C ports, though both were USB 3.0. One of the dongles purchased for that MBP was a multi port AV adapter that had an HDMI socket, a USB-A port and a USB-C port for the power cable. Seems to me that this should work just fine with the Neo. The 2017 MBP was replaced with an M3 MBP that came with Magsafe, 3 USB-C/Thunderbolt ports, an HDMI socket and an SD card reader meaning the only dongles needed were USB-A to USB-C and an Ethernet adapter.
Large LWR plants are typically 33% efficient, with the limit imposed by the 1000psi saturated steam. The HTGR's were supposed to be 38% efficient and early LMFBR plant designs were calling for 40+ efficiency before issues with swelling of fuel cladding became known.
The ultra-critical coal plants are supposed to be 45% efficient and the latest combined cycle combustion turbine plants are reaching 61% efficiency. The high efficiency of the combined cycle plant really pays off in areas short of cooling water.
Reminds of a saying: "Good judgement comes from experience, experience comes from exercising bad judgement." Getting burned by some undocumented or poorly documented "feature" leaves a lasting impression on one's mind - and someone fresh out of school is unlikely to have come across these "features".
I remember the BYTE article on dataflow architectures being the "new big thing". ISTR this was a mid 1980's issue, with BYTE's publication ending with the July 1998 issue.
Seems to me that the most common use is for signal processing as shown by the number of MAC blocks in most large FPGAs.
>The OG MIT License came in to being most likely in 1987, the OG BSD License definetly came to being in 1988, while the OG GPL came into being in 1989... AND RMS was working at MIT when he wrothe the OG GPL. So, if anything, MIT and BSD influenced the GPL not the other way around.
>Without MIT and BSD we would probably not have the GPL...
It could be said that the BSD license was influenced by the license SPICE was released with and SPICE was developed in the 1970's. SPICE being Simulation Package for Integrated Circuit Electronics.
The satellite and debris are in a low orbit, which means the drag from the atmosphere will quickly remove the objects from orbit. IIRC, SpaceX deploys the satellites at a lower orbit and then has the satellites boost themselves to the operational orbit. That way, a DOA bird will de-orbit in a relatively short time.
In case of a real Kessler Syndrome event, the lowest orbits will be cleared out in a relatively short time, but the more useful orbits will need some sort of active clearing to become usable.
The troll icon was appropriate for your post.
There was intent in my post to suggest anything negative about his degree, the comment about CAD was based his experience learning SolidWorks in high school compared with freshmen who apparently had no significant exposure to CAD prior to their start at Purdue. A related note, we went computer shopping with him, popped into a Best Buy and was pleasantly surprised that the sales droids had a decent clue. Turns out the younger one was an EE major at Purdue.
President Chiang was rather dismissive about AI in his speech at the 2023 graduation ceremony where my son was getting his BS degree. To be fair, he was commenting on the quality of AI generated text as opposed to applications where AI may be of real benefit. From what my son has said about his working with freshmen, it sounds like more emphasis is needed on CAD, although AI may be of help with dealing with CAD.