You were asking for trouble;
Having marmite in your luggage is more than a bit odd.
Mine's the one with the brown stains and odd smell in the pockets - no, really!
1414 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Jul 2009
Remember it's usually not the hardware which fails, although that's where it's easiest to throw money. The biggest components of service recovery are problem determination and application restore. I don't think I've ever seen application restoration following failure as a requirement during application package selection, that always is viewed as an infrastructure problem or a bolt on.
This is in terms of operational failure, when you talk 'DR' then it adds organisational reaction times to the mix. I've only once worked with an organisation (a global bank) which actually could cope with a disaster hitting it's datacentre.
I've come round to the view that for most businesses, building a bulletproof main environment is more worthwhile than trying to provide a cut price DR environment.
A lot of companies lease a virtualised DR centre > shipping their data and planning to call down capacity from a server farm if they need to invoke DR. I'd love to know how the DC provider calculates capacity and whether they refuse customers who are too close geographically to each other and likely to suffer from the same disasters.
Buy me a pint and I'll keep talking all day about this.
I'm not particularly worried about Google's intentions or use of this information, but am generally with the German government that any information out there is really none of Google's business.
I mainly am trying to imagine the conversation on the Google side. Do they just see all data as worth keeping 'just in case' they can find a use for it later? Carrying on from an earlier commenter, I imagine the Google photocopier uploads arse scans following the Christmas party, just in case they can figure how to tie them to employee number sometime in the future.
I just mean if it ran Windows for Warships or SAP R/3 KIL module I'd see why it was being reported in El Reg...or even if it had a figurehead featuring Bulgarian Airbags (why don't ships have figureheads these days?) but as it is it seems like a story written because the reporter knows a lot about the subject, not because there's any public interest - I can get that by buying a Linux magazine.
Paris - because it's springtime.
and I don't really know anything about the military - I appreciate this is a big expense for UK taxpayers but don't really know what the IT angle is - isn't this just the same as a huge investment in trams or something else in the Heavy Engineering sector?
(ps: I do understand the difference between England, Great Britain and the UK but the Royal Navy always seemed such a purely English construct and unlikely to change allegiance if Scotland, for example, gains independance)
or he'll fly across the Atlantic on this personal air vehicle and take a dump on your roof!
Hey maybe he can sell one to Richard Branson to cross the Atlantic with too?
(yes, yes, I read the range and endurance numbers but don't stop them trying, maybe they'll get some of the extra double good batteries with bunnies in them)