Mac users
If you use command-line then the simple way to disable IPv6 for all interfaces is
sudo ip6 -x
351 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Jun 2009
it seems to me that there are several reasons for the sequence so far. Obviously, removing surface-to-air capability is crucial, and severing command-and-control links is high up on the list.
Taking out an armoured column clearly removes that as a threat but also says "who's next" to the mercenaries. They're not part of the tribes and peeling them off is essential so that the Libyans can solve their own problem. Given the results of the past day or so, I would expect that many will be heading out very soon.
Verizon's similar scheme in the U.S. doesn't involve any splicing in the field as far as I could tell. It uses specific lengths of pre-terminated cable that connect to splitters etc.
That's more involved in that you have to measure fairly carefully and stock various lengths rather than bulk cable. But it does solve the problem of field splices etc.
I remember the Microsoft Funeral Parade
http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/10/microsoft-celebrates-windows-phone-7-rtm-with-funeral-parade-for/
If MS has only moved 1.5 MM since launch, and most of those are still in the channel, it seems that they had the wrong body in the coffin.
your point with Pvt. Manning (allegations at present, but I'll assume they're correct for the moment) is well taken. There ARE "need to know" rules that apply.
What we have here is yet another command failure - classified access is subject to audit but it seems that no-one did. I can imagine that he could browse through most of the stuff about Iraq and even Afghanistan without raising much concern. But his C.O. should have questioned him after, say, the first ten State Dep't cables showed up.
And in yet another instance of cluelessness, the general scenario of all this was known months ago. Yet State waited until after the document-dump to change procedures. Why wait? Did they believe that it didn't really happen? Or maybe they were just too busy with other things.
When I hear of a Court Martial being scheduled for his C.O. - only then will I believe that DoD is serious about fixing this. It's not hard, and doesn't take Big-Brother technology. Just start reminding the chain of command they they are responsible for classified information in their care. A few lengthy prison terms will clear this up quicker than any technology (and we know how well that stuff goes)
Charging Manning is one thing, but far from enough.
When does his CO face charges for dereliction of duty for ineffective oversight? It's one thing for Manning (if the allegations are in fact true) to look through lots of stuff going on in the war around him. It is quite another for him to browse through hundreds of thousands of classified documents that belonged to a different Government department.
It is not unreasonable for him to have access to Dept of State docs - he was an intelligence analyst. But the number is not reasonable and shows that there was no audit, no oversight of his activity.
A Court Martial is in order here.
Hi Steve,
I just configured a Dell R210 (their cheapest 1U rackable) and your config lists for $1511 and is now on sale for $1284. That's with just one 160GB drive. With two 500 GB drives it's $1870 list. $1643 on sale.
Maybe you had a different box in mind? I didn't see a cheaper one but maybe I missed it.
The Mini is certainly less powerful etc than this but I can get one for under a grand.
These are sold to end users as "TonidoPlug" and are available in U.S. from codelathe.com
I'm not related to them - just a satisfied customer.
There may well be other vendors but this is the one I found. Nice system.
BTW the "PogoPlug" is somewhat similar but has less memory (128 instead of 512, I think). You can get it for a bit less but I prefer the additional memory.
If we're talking about ground-to-air comms setting off a bomb carried as cargo, who's to know when it's sent and which plane it's on.
If we're discussing a suicide event, then it has to be in that passenger's checked luggage. If it's a parcel, you don't know what plane it's on or when.
Of course, if you send FedEx or UPS then it's probably on the FedEx or UPS plane. But *you* aren't. If it's carried on another aircraft then you don't know which.
There's just a massive common-sense-disconnect here.
The only real issue is the suicide passenger who gets a bomb into a checked bag that he/she couldn't get through passenger screening. Fixing that means you have to screen all the bags. If a suicide terrorist is on board, rules about cell phones or WiFi are pointless. You have to stop the bag before it gets on board.
But packages and freight are different. You don't need to worry about passengers setting off a freight-bomb.
If the Board believe it was this bad then why did it take the sex-allegation investigation to uncover it? Surely overseeing the CEO one of the Board's main responsibilities.
If the Board failed this badly then it too should resign. And most especially the Chairman.
Either they're lying or they're incompetent. Both are cause for termination, eh?
Seriously Jack, where's your own credibiity?
Turning GE into a bank so it can crash and burn along with Wall St? Gee, thanks. Setting up the uber-sweet retirement deals that finally came to light during the messy trial? Fine for you but left thousands of GE employees and retirees in the lurch. Thanks again.
Forgetting to renew the prenup before it expired? Priceless!
It's not a Steve issue. Macs etc have supported IPv6 for years. Same for Windows.
The real problem is that ISPs don't support it. And there are millions of home routers that don't either. Linksys/Belkin/D-Link/Netgear and their friends stand to make a killing on this. As soon as the ISPs support it for punters. Which they don't. Sigh.
In hindsight, it seems incredibly stupid of Siemens to be running such critical systems on WIndows. I agree (and have been saying the same for years - one of a few voices in the wilderness).
I guess that Siemens is wondering about the survival of their credibility, as well as that of the managed systems. Attaching yourself to Windows doesn't seem quite the "obvious decision" that I assume it was originally. Still an obvious decision but in the other sense.
However, Siemens is in good company. After all, the Royal Navy and United States Navy are both running warships on Windows, so it has to be OK. Right?
I wonder if *they* have any Siemens gear?
'Cmon guys! Fer cryin' out loud!
Article leads in ... "Seventy-two per cent of developers believe "
Not until we read on to paragraph 3 do we find that "[t]he survey polled over 2,400 Titanium developers"
Your editors can do better than this. And should. Your stories, and your site in general, are more useful when we can generally trust them. Being economical with the truth does not help you or us.
The conclusions you reach may well be right but the evidence you give for it doesn't support the claim. Pointing to IDC doesn't do any good as the story linked is from April and no longer relevant. I'm not about to search IDC's site for the supporting info you might have quoted.
Please ensure that your headlines and story are supported by the evidence you present.
This is walking down the same well-trodden path blazed by encryption-restrictions and Clipper-chip.
In the short term, the most likely effect will be to increase the turnout at Jon Stewart's "Rally to Restore Sanity"
Over the longer term it will send the software-privacy industry out of the U.S. Again.
I had to buy a 3Com switch recently - a particular model number as specified by the customer. Not a big deal or a lot of money. But that 3Com offering is discontinued (since being spec'ed in June) because all 3Com is now HP something-or-other.
So HP has taken over the 3Com site and the product link goes to an HP page saying the the model is discontinued. All fairly normal. Now for the HP marketing part - it doesn't say what the replacement product is, or a close match. I spent quite a while searching the abysmal HP site and finally gave up. Bought a Netgear instead (customer was OK with that).
I am reminded of a quote from an HP salesman many years ago when (in another gig) we were buying Unix boxes from them.
"If we were selling sushi, our Marketing literature would describe it as 'cold dead fish'."
"That also means constant connectivity, which in turn requires (effectively) unlimited data and impacts battery life, but neither of those should be a problem for the corporate executive who'll likely be Microsoft's the first target."
I'll agree that the corporate types don't have an issue with the data plan. But battery life? Seriously, that's always an issue.
As Apple has shown, battery life is as much about the software as the size of the battery. If MS has the application support architecture right then battery life becomes a manageable problem. If multi-tasking is just what's done on desktop/laptops then WinPhone7 will soon join its Kin.
'Bout time emailers did a sanity check if you try to send to hundreds and hundreds.
At least make it an option so you're prompted "Are you sure?"
I once received one with 88K of addresses. It was the company's entire list of customers, and included some addresses that had previously been kept very quiet.
Simple.
1. This news will get out, sooner or later. After all, there must be some people who know he used to work at Google (a sought-after gig) and now does not.
2. If you (i.e. Google) don't announce it, world+dog will say you covered it up. Maybe even Gizmodo. Then you're on the defensive explaining that it wasn't really all that significant, blah blah.
In this case, I don't think that Google went public soon enough. They should have announced it about the time it happened, although probably without naming the person involved. This should have been out in July, not September.
It's true that some on-stick encryption is not that great, although it'll keep out many.
Better is to have the stick as an encrypted filesystem so the crypto is done in the host. Of course, that only works if the host itself is secured well enough. If it's WIndows (probably the safest of all the assumptions in this thread) then this could be problematic.
Superglue on all the USB ports, optical drives etc isn't really a viable idea.
A better one would be to fire the IT firm and hire one that knows how to do it. Probably not the lowest bidder.
As I said the other day (I'm not a lawyer and don't give advice other than to suggest that you hire a lawyer you trust), I understand that the owner of the "cloud" owns the data. So your data in the cloud doesn't have the same legal protection that applies to your data in your own server room.
Given Microsoft's history, they'd be last on the list of places I'd consider. Fortunately, that is not a decision I have to make.
I really do hope that Congress in the U.S. addresses this issue - soon. For other jurisdictions, you have to work on your own legislators.
The petition format that will be effective is the one placed in front of a Court of Law. More commonly known as a "lawsuit". A Petition for Relief.
If Dell distributes stuff that is licensed to them under GPL and does not fulfill the terms of the licence then that's a breach of copyright. Pure and simple. They're in breach now so they've already lost their GPL rights. Restoration of rights under GPLv3 is a LOT simpler than under GPLv2. Since we're talking Linux kernel here, it's GPLv2 so Dell's lawyers have some fancy footwork ahead of them.
If they don't move quick smartly then all Dell's Linux things could go poof. For their sake, I *do* hope that they have rights to the missing code.
'Tis unfortunate that it's an insurance company. No doubt they're self-insured for this sort of thing and will just treat it as cost-of-doing-business.
Had it been a regular company then their business insurance rates would go way up - 'natch. The bean-counters could then weigh this against the cost of improving security and, hopefully, apply appropriate funding to (2)