Re: Citrix is done
In good part due to the cost of citrix AND windows licenses. Had it been cheap, VDIs would be the normal thing to have in offices and homes these days, along portable devices.
1580 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Jun 2009
Fpga is not the present in these systems.
Quite a few use xeon platinum processors in specific configurations for SDN equipment.
These processors are very expensive and power hungry, but correctly use can process ungodly amounts of traffic in a flexible way.
A DSP will.process a lot of traffic cheaply... But is set on stone.
A fpga is expensive and way slower, but flexible.
What Ampere is trying to say is they are cheaper than Intel and less power hungry.
It is going to hit hard companies like Cisco. AMD and Intel will be affected, losing sales, but won't be hard hit.
The government is also going out of us controlled processors.
The biggest consumers of processors are data centers, business and tertiary personal devices.
I guess that will come next.
More worrying is the timeframe. Looks like China is considering going to war with the us after 3/4 years, and they obviously can't do that with us made processors and sw everywhere.
I disagree. It is immoral, but quite logical.
You have hostages (clients) and you buy for day 1 billion. Extract 2 billion in 2 years, and move on.
Amazing benefit.
Now move on and extract value from the next company.
This was done in the 80s repeatedly with terrible consequences for the economy, as it is essentially a hostage situation plus setting a company on fire. Value is overall destroyed and resources (money) plundered.
Increasing prices this much and removing training and certification will probably give them the benefits of 20+ years in a couple of years.
Of course it will seriously damage the long term value of vmware, but they are essentially strip mining the value of the asset they bought.
It is immoral, as it breaks the assumed agreement between partners (vmware and clients), but probably legal in most parts of the world.
Overall I find it quite damaging for IT and the world in general, but sadly this was to be expected.
Most of my big customers always had the backup network port and network, plus servers. Everything independent.
But it was expensive.
So they recreated that as virtual appliances.
Still expensive.
So they "went to the cloud" as it seemed less expensive. And threw caution to the wind.
Now it is more expensive than the initial situation and less resilient, but they are trapped.
Constant backup on cloud premises is neither practical nor affordable.
The cost is huge, and makes the cloud difficult to justify.
Almost everyone that uses Amazon has the data in amazon. In another region as backup, yes, but still on amazon/azure/google.
I hate clean hydrogen, as such thing doesn't exist.
Also, how do they pretend to store hydrogen long term? That is, in practice, impossible without loss.
Under pressure it will go through the pressure vessel and potentially embrittle it, and liquid it needs to be extremely cold, and that requires energy input to keep it cool.
Where they want to source this hydrogen from is also of interes.
They would be better served by batteries.
If you already have a massive bank of lifepo batteries.. more options open.
You are correct, but uefi is just wrong. It is running a mystery os that is unaccountable.
It does have benefits, but is very unsecure.
If we add the "secure" enclaves mystery os, plus complex os/firmware in drives and network cards, what a security nightmare.
Having it fitted we are looking at £500 or about.
I did install it because even if overkill, hey, it is my life, and I can afford it.
But considering how many fires are, and how many lives this would save.. I think this is overkill.
There are about 44 deaths by fires in Scotland per year.
Lets assume the US number of 55% reduction is correct.
There are 2.53 million households in Scotland.
Let's assume all those 44 deaths are residential, and no firefighters, etc (so best case scenario for alarms)
This would save 24 lives.
The battery ones last about 6 years really, not 10, and the installed ones are very expensive to install.
The cost? 8.8 million pounds per life.
While life is quite valuable, there are many things than can be done for less money to save lives, and actuaries would agree.
I would say, fix potholes, put lights on dangerous intersections, do colon cancer screenings sooner, etc etc.
If you fit them yourself, it is better value, still quite expensive, but I did it for £200
Sources:
https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Data-research-and-tools/Detection-and-Signaling/Smoke-Alarms-in-US-Home-Fires#:~:text=The%20risk%20of%20dying%20in,to%20trigger%20a%20smoke%20alarm.
https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/statistics/statistics-by-theme/households/household-estimates/2021
Australian sources are even less trust worthy.
They could be telling the truth, but their rhetoric is "China bad" no matter if actually bad, or even involved.
Not that I like the CCP, they are mostly not a force of good, but this is getting a bit ridiculous.
Remember when Huawei was being accused of being a security risk? This is probably part of the same confrontation between the US and China.
As someone living in Europe, we can only lose from this.
Software blocked its death.
The platform does not matter. Software and the ecosystem is what matters. But now as software is running behind closed doors on walled gardens, they can use something they control and not pay royalties and huge margins to others.
It is also terrible for the small players, as we are moving from open systems to everything proprietary, including hardware.