Silver? How passé
Black is the new silver. Silver hasn't been the new silver for at least 5 years - do try to keep up.
347 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Jun 2009
This looks like a really nice piece of kit. Certainly the first of this type of device that I'd actively consider buying. As long as I don't miss out on features by not having a BES account.
QNX always was a very nicely put together OS - I'm glad it's finally breaking out of the worthy but dull world of embedded systems.
18.5% pales in comparison to some of Brewdog's more extreme efforts:
Tactical Nuclear Penguin 32% ABV
Sink The Bismark 41% ABV
and the limited edition, and now sadly sold out The End of History a with 55% ABV (Be sure to check out the packaging: http://www.brewdog.com/blog-article.php?id=341)
The HMV brand colours don't really lend themselves to an attractive website do they? Think I'll stick to 7digital for the time being (seeing as they provide the backend to hmvdigital anyway).
But more, reasonably priced, DRM free, retailers are always welcome. Now all we need is better provision of higher quality lossless formats.
Anecdotally, literally everyone know/have seen with an iPhone uses one of those ugly cases anyway so the reception issues when handling the phone 'bare' are probably a bit of a moot point.
I've always found it a touch ironic that such an "icon of design" is so routinely defaced with invariably tasteless or just plane ugly rubber cases. Probably goes to show that people really don't give a toss about the looks (at least once it's out of the shop).
I foresee a future of such elegantly sculpted, yet paper thin, phones that a sizeable "protective" rubber sleeve is required just to make it large enough to get hold of :)
Why would anyone who's not a telecoms engineer want to change the first 5 digits of their mobile number when they switched networks? If you have to do that then the entire point of keeping your number would be null and void.
I don't think anyone out in the real world associates the first 5 digits of their mobile number with a particular network, and regardless of that I imagine that there has been sufficient churn over the last decade that any significant correlation between the two is rapidly diminishing.
The really stupid thing is that the same demos are available from the safari developer website without the browser check: http://developer.apple.com/safaridemos/
All work find on Chrome for instance (apart from the video one that needs a quicktime codec - why not the much lauded h264?). Apparently Firefox also works quite well.
Someone should explain the meaning of the word standards to whatever marketing wonk thought this was a good idea.
Apple are currently making money hand over fist. Apart from the reluctance to hand out a dividend from their massive pile of cash, what cause for criticism of Steve Jobs do Apple shareholders currently have?
I'm not a huge fan of Apple, but I respect what they do, and frankly more companies should have true characters at the helm - it makes things far more entertaining for the rest of us.
I quite agree. Particularly as a suitable scheduled task would do the job just as effectively, after running the updater program could then terminate entirely.
But what would you expect from a company which invented the Acrobat speed launcher thing that ran perpetually just to increase acrobat reader launch time by some fraction of a second.
Surely with low-margin devices, owning your own OS has got to to the advantage of your bottom line over paying a third party (ie Microsoft).
And to those above making derogatory comments about WebOS - have you actually used it? it's quite possibly the finest of the current crop of smartphone UIs from a design and usability perspective, and it runs on a sufficiently vanilla build of linux that you can run desktop linux apps with a bit of tweaking ( http://www.geekword.net/openoffice-on-palm-pre/ ).
"Like Microsoft, Apple is one of the patent licensors behind the H.264 codec, which means the company gets money when it's used."
Certainly in Microsoft's case this a disingenuous statement - they have previously stated:
"Microsoft receives back from MPEG-LA less than half the amount for the patent rights that it contributes because there are many other companies that provide the licensed functionality..."
Source: http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/05/03/follow-up-on-html5-video-in-ie9.aspx
My understanding is you can do just that. Penultimate paragraph here: http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2010/05/03/follow-up-on-html5-video-in-ie9.aspx
This whole thing seems a bit of a storm in a teacup (ah, must be the internet). As I understand it the patent situation around advanced video codecs is, at best, muddy. So platform providers have a choice of supporting something where the licensing situation is well known (ie H.624) or something that you may get sued for later (and is arguably inferior anyway).
This article on the subject is quite good: http://www.engadget.com/2010/05/04/know-your-rights-h-264-patent-licensing-and-you/
I think Gizmodo already returned the 4G iPhone to Apple after they'd finished analysing it. Allegedly the finder had previously attempted to return it to Apple but was rebuffed by Apple support who refused to believe it was a legitimate prototype device, instead assuming that it was merely a cheap rip-off.
I believe the issue here is that it is illegal in California to buy something if you know that it is not the property of the seller.
Smacks a bit of sour grapes on Apple's part to me.
Pricing is comparable to their existing cable-delivered movies on demand (although maybe 50p per movie more expensive) so I'm guessing they have the data to suggest that this will sell. While blockbuster and LOVEFiLM are undoubtedly cheaper - you have to traipse to the video store to save your quid in the case of the former, and with LOVEFiLM you don't get to specify precisely which movie you want at any one time (and you have to wait for delivery).
People will pay for convenience, especially if VM follow the US Netflix model and also get player software on XBox, PS3, built into televisions etc.
For a start there's this thing called lossless compression (Apple lossless supports up to 24bits per sample at 192kbps - which is DVD Audio quality).
Regardless, in the general scheme of things £300 isn't all that much for an amp and speakers - a high quality MP3 (256kbps or greater) is plenty good enough to sound excellent in most listening conditions.
One of the ironies of Microsoft's purchase of sysinternals a few years back is that you can now obtain the BSOD screensaver directly from the MS website:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb897558.aspx
It's entirely benign and entirely unrelated to this story, but it did remind me.
Thus far it appears that the X3 lacks a keyboard and will be Android Powered. The X2 will maintain a keyboard and be WinMo 6.5 powered:
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://www.mobilebulgaria.com/news/view.php%3Fid%3D13078&sl=auto&tl=en&history_state0=
So not really dropping Windows at all then.
"This being Microsoft, you have to install its Silverlight plug-in for Internet Explorer to view the lectures."
You have to install Silverlight, granted. But the Silverlight plugin is available for IE, Firefox and Safari on Windows and OSX. It even works on Google chrome (albeit unsupported). And you can get the moonlight plugin for firefox on SUSE, openSUSE, Ubuntu and Fedora.
I was looking around for a second battery for my Olympus SLR recently, and the official option was £40! While there were many no-name generic replacement batteries available for well under £10, I went for a replacement from what I considered a reputable battery brand (Uniross) for £15 - but presumably if Olympus were to follow Panasonic's lead I would have no choice but to pay through the nose for the "official" product :(