AI can be a teacher, or it can do the work for you.
You choose, but beware, one path rots your brain.
1206 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Jun 2009
"Companies like Meta and Shopify have made headlines by treating token usage as a key performance indicator, and employees have answered the call by trying to signal their value through heavy use of AI tools. That can get expensive quickly and may not do much for more meaningful business metrics."
I have this dream where I end up working for an employer whose bonus structure is tied to the number of lines of code produced or the number of bugs found. I suspect we all, on some level, share that dream.
Now it's started, Glasswing has to happen. There has to be an assumption that China or Russia get hold of something comparable to Mythos at some point. They will not play nice. I say this with full knowledge that this is also a nice play for more investor money on Anthropic's part. They've got form. If Mythos is approaching what Anthropic is egging it up to be, we're in fringe territory.
"Building a digital ID scheme around a technology increasingly blamed for shortening attention spans and worsening mental health in adults, as well as children, looks inconsistent at best."
Social media: A set of applications classed as such, many of which provide apps which run on smartphones.
Digital ID: A form of ID that may be stored in the digital wallet app of a smartphone.
Smartphone: A networked programmable pocket computer that happens to support voice and text communications out of the box.
What inconsistency do you see? Digital ID is not social media. Smartphones are not social media.
I judge it entirely on its utility. Can I get the Code Companion plugin for Vim to do a bit of grunt work using a small local model? Yes I can, and it's a small productivity gain. Can I get Nano Banana to produce an accurate infographic for a presentation? Absolutely. Some things work. Some things don't.
What is clear is that unlike the ghosts of AI past, AI present is here to stay in one form or another. Unlike the past, adoption in the present is pretty pervasive.
By 2030, TMSC's Gigafab Cluster in Arizona should be producing 2nm chips. Currently, yields are similar to those in Taiwan. Now imagine a world where not only are fewer chips being made, but those chips are made only in an increasingly protectionist US.
Plenty of other countries implemented ID without becoming totalitarian. Plenty of things were never required here. Until they were required. In fact, across the broad arc of human history, lots of things were considered tradition until they weren't. Drowning people accused of witchcraft, for example. I understand it is known as progress.
"As it stands, an AI PC is a solution looking for a problem. It will remain that way until a genuinely useful program/feature comes along that can actually utilise the NPU."
If I run asitop on my Mac, I see the NPUs fire into action if I do subject or sky selection in Lightroom or Photoshop, so they will be used for various things in the background.
"If there's no killer feature that can utilise the NPU and provide real-world benefit? What's the point in shelling out for an AI PC? At the moment, the only thing they've got is "future proofing"..."
Caveat: I have no idea if the same can be said for a PC. For example, running Ollama locally makes zero use of the NPU on the beefy corporate Lenovo that was recently handed to me. Co-Pilot doesn't seem to do anything locally.
This is very on point, so I'm surprised at the downvotes. Some of the responses fail to distinguish between the model doing the work (i.e. vibe coding, often with very lazy prompting) and answering simple, well-composed questions, which is what the best models actually do pretty well. People who use the technology well have already broken the problem down and are well on their way to a solution.
As for vibe-coding, we should be careful not to dismiss it, as the long-term danger it poses is real.
"The big concern, as Lewis states, is that other mobile providers will feel emboldened"
I wouldn't mind if EE did this. When I left BT Broadband earlier this year, I ported my number from the BT Mobile MVNO to EE without reading some of the small print*. It was the path of least resistance, but now it feels rather silly of me. As such, I wouldn't mind the opportunity to port out.
* 5G speeds capped unless you pay for an absurdly priced plan (and that's with SIM only), plus the daily charge they levy for roaming in Europe.
Back in caveman days, I had a dial-up and later broadband with AOL UK. I signed up for a service called iTunes because I bought an iPod, which gave me many years of happy bus commutes. I use that ID to sign into my iPad and MacBook. I don't think Apple allows changing the email address associated with an account.
"It's the only response any sensible person can have to Starmercards. Whether or not they're a world class arsehole.
Starmercards are going to be a form of internal passport that will underpin every aspect of our existence: buying fags, going to the pub, visiting a doctor, using the Internet, voting, getting on a train or a bus, going to a concert, visiting a supermarket, using a car park, buying a lotto ticket, borrowing a library book, etc, etc. You seem to think that dystopian Orwellian nightmare will be a Good Thing.
"Now there *might* be a case for a unified state-provided ID scheme along the lines of the one used in Ireland. But that's not the snake-oil arsehole Starmer and his pond life are selling. They want cradle to grave, all-pervasive unavoidable monitoring of everyone, everywhere. Without getting any sort of public consensus or democratic approval for that. And lie about all of it. Fuck 'em.
We didn't vote for any of this shit. Which means there's no democratic mandate for Starmercards and the mother of all databases behind them."
Starmercards? FFS sake grow up.
You've just argued for a robust, government issued photo ID system. Your passport can be removed if the authorities deem you a flight risk. Your driving licence can be taken away if you are caught being an arsehole behind the wheel. Your gun licence can be revoked if you are diagnosed a bloody maniac. Try identifying yourself without any of those.
We live in a country where you have no fundamental right to robustly identify yourself. Yet whenever a government tries to introduce ID, Britain's world class arseholes scream Nazi.
That headline has literally turned me into a gullible idiot who will believe anything.
I left an item on a plane this week and getting it back has proved fraught/unlikely. My calls are met with AI answers - the modern equivalent of "compu-ah sais no".
BTW, a colleague did use Co-Pilot to write his resignation email. It's quite good at those.
That gets an up-vote from me, and I'm probably one of the bigger users of AI on the team I work on (mainly as an alternative to Google search). Asking students to get AI to write the code for them shows a frightening lack of self awareness on the part of management*.
* But then again, we are talking the kind of blithering idiots who think AI is a great way to not need junior engineers anymore.
I did recently see what seemed to a reasonably well researched vid on YouTube about Amazon's working culture. It essentially boiled down to not encouraging employees to work for them long enough for the stock options to mature. It's on a pretty long list of employers I would avoid (in no small part thanks to El Reg's journalism over the years).
In the US, they're the FAANG of last resort for engineering talent (and that's saying something, bearing in mind Meta is on the list).
Icon? Let's just say the water don't taste like what it ought-a here. Cheers.
I think that was more about Apple Intelligence than the Mac's ability to run local LLMs (which they do very well within their memory limitations - the latest models all max out at 32Gb - the M5 Pro and Max have not yet been announced).