Posts by Rich 2 1579 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Jun 2009
“…probe at Google for allegedly using web and YouTube content to train its AI algorithms while putting competitors at a disadvantage”
This is the wrong thing to “probe”. What they SHOULD be looking at is whether Googlies should be doing this AT ALL!! Most people on here know the answer to that already, of course but why spoil the opportunity to spend 5 years “probing” the bleedin’ obvious?
Jeeeeez…..
“FreeBSD used a non-trivial 1.8 GB of RAM”
Are you sure the OS is using that much? By default, ZFS will eat any spare memory and use it as cache which tends to make the memory usage look really bad. When in reality, it’s not - it’s just ZFS using otherwise unused memory
But I would be surprised if you didn’t already know this
I know this is a stupid question but it’s bothered me for a while so here we go
Why does anyone launch a DoS attack like this? Especially at this scale. What’s in it for the culprits? Is it just for a laugh? I can (sort of) understand a possible motive for knocking a single, specific website or services of the net. But at this scale, boat-loads of random stuff will be (potentially) effected. But why? What is the motive?
While virtual box works, the demands of windows means that the guest os you have running in the vm is strangled. I ran Linux in vb at work on a machine with 8 cores and could only allocate a couple of cores to Linux in the vm. Any more and the whole thing came crashing down. Not really a fault of vb (as far as I know)
“Yet preloading an application rather than examining what's slowing it down feels like treating symptoms, not causes“
Feels like tearing the symptoms? You are being way too generous!
MS is utterly incapable of writing any decent software. At best, they are totally incompetent. At worse, they are fraudsters.
"The full record will show that for over a decade, we have listened to parents, researched issues that matter most, and made real changes to protect teens," Meta added. "We're proud of the progress we've made and we stand by our record."
Taken word-by-word, I think that quote is TECHNICALLY correct (obviously allowing for their sewer-level standards of pride). But it's a straw statement; it's the words that are NOT said that are important. They have not said (for example) "we did some studies and they showed that we're not total scum" or "nobody ever pointed out that we're morally bankrupt"
Rather than a Trusted Execution Environment, what about a Not-In-The-Least-Trusted Execution Environment?
It always irks me when I have to click noscript’s ‘trust’ button for Google or some such to get a website to work. Just because I’m having to allow it doesn’t mean I trust it one little bit
“When complete, OpenAI's first Stargate datacenter will exceed 400,000 Nvidia GPUs consuming 1.2 gigawatts of power.”
…which might be justified if it was going to be put to use on something a tad more useful than outputting broken code, or plagiarising some books or “nudification”; like some pressing global issue or other. But alas
Oh, and if the hydrogen turbines is an attempt to make the whole thing look “green”, it’s worth pointing out (in case you didn’t already know) that the vast majority of hydrogen is extracted from fossil fuels and is definitely not “green”
Info is one of the most annoying things ever invented. There is a perfectly good man page system…. So GNU have to invent another!! But the man page still exists!! But when you look at it, there is bugger-all information in it with a strapline of “see bla bla .info for details”. F&£@ers!!!
“…review if legislation introduced in 2022 is being applied effectively…”
I can give you an answer right now. No. Is not effective. Yes, the culprits are STILL monopolies and behave abhorrently.
But do feel free to spend the next 5 years “investigating” and “consulting” to come up with the same answer. F%#*ing useless
It is rather odd. An AI bubble is one thing - it’s just a bubble like blockchain or the metaverse.
But the lunacy around AI has evolved way beyond that. All the tech companies, almost without exception, seem to have been snorting the same “shit” and seen to be on a “we gotta get AI into everything right NOW or WE WILL DIE!!!!” mindset. And none of them are listening to their customers, most of which are screaming NO!!!!!! It is, quite literally, crazy.
It will be interesting to see where it ends
It’s the plug-in/extension support that keeps me hooked on Firefox. As far as I know, no other browser comes close in this regard.
If I could run noscript, uMayrix, and a couple of other plugins on another browser I would jump ship. Maybe I need to do more research…
The notion that copyright on fonts and icons makes reselling illegal has always been nonsense and MS knows it.
If it were illegal then so would selling a second hand book (obviously copyright) or anything at all that featured any unique and/or distinguishing features, like Lego or a even a particular brand of car - what would stop BMW saying you can’t resell one if it’s cars because it happens to have a copyrighted BMW badge on the front? It would be a ridiculous situation
I’ve run my 16G laptop without any swap at all due the last 8 or so years.
Many people still think this is heresy but I’ve never encountered a single issue. In my head, swap is an an anachronism on modern hardware with gobs of memory. If I ever run out of memory then something has gone very wrong anyway.
Also, re running from a flash drive, make sure /tmp is moved to RAM. I also redirect some stuff in /var to the (RAM-based) /tmp and also move the cache and other crap that Firefox writes to constantly to /tmp
I’m not worried about it. I don’t run Debian and probably never will. I was just interested in what was going on. And I try and stay as far away as I can from Windows so any reference to that is probably lost on me, I’m afraid :-)
I think my misunderstanding stems from thinking “port” was an application port - such as a “port” of libre office. That’s what a “port” is in the BSD world. I wasn’t thinking that “port” was referring to moving the OS to a different platform. My fault for being dim.
It does seem, from the comments, I’m not the only one that was confused though
I’m not familiar with this and a little confused. Which bit of the system is going to have to be written in Rust? The package installers? If so then surely that’s “standard” (OS-wide) code anyway, no? And surely, it makes sense to use a single language for the installer (whatever that may be)
The issue I have with Snap and Flatpack is that they are the wrong solution to a problem
The problem being that the Linux environment - whatever you want to call it - is so chaotic in terms of library versions that running everything as individual “lite” containers becomes attractive in the first place
Snap and Flatpack have well documented issues too, in terms of inter-operability with stuff outside of the containers
But nobody is addressing the underlying problem with Linux in this respect. I’m not even sure it’s fixable. So if you are going to run everything as containers, the underlying OS becomes largely irrelevant anyway.
The BSDs avoid all this, of course, because they are all a coherent system with OS and matching userland
I can’t help feeling that Linux is starting to rot a bit. It has some issues (as does any system) and the “solutions” seem to be increasingly to add more gloop. Carry on like this and before we know it, it will be as hideous as Windows
“…and suggests tailored prompts to help you connect and collaborate”
Because you’re too thick to think for yourself!!
This shit is so …..shit? …. that it’s becoming a joke. MS release a feature nobody wants. All its customers say “fuck off”, MS hears “oooo — more please!!”. Thank goodness I don’t have the headache of dealing with this crap
“Central government departments hold 41 live contracts with AWS worth a total of £1.11 billion”
For that kind of money, the govt could build its own distributed bit barns complete with its own private “cloud”, whilst creating jobs for the locals too
Obviously, instead of doing this, they would give the money to some twats like Fujitsu or Serco who would spend it all on bonuses and deliver bugger-all, while the price spirals out of all reasoning
Oh well. Nice idea I suppose
Just because MS are no longer supporting these versions of exchange, it doesn’t mean they’re suddenly going to become vulnerable
I mean, it’s not like MS have any kind of track record of weekly faults and compromises in any of their products, bodged patches, more faults, more vulnerabilities, and general shonky software quality issues, is it?
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
