
For once, I'm with Farcebook
Anything that prevents impressionable youngsters being lured into the sordid, perverse world of soap operas can only be good.
343 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Jun 2009
I reckon the shopkeeper thought he was 'getting one over' on some old duffer who (being over 50) would obviously be clueless about newfangled crackle-magic devices. There's nothing like letting people think that *they* are robbing *you*, to pull the wool over their eyes.
Saw exactly that dynamic in a story a few weeks back about a US pawn dealer getting burned -
"On Feb. 3, a downtown Port Angeles business, EZ Pawn, paid a person about $20 each for more than 20 counterfeit U.S. Morgan silver dollars that were supposedly from a century ago...
Brian Winters of EZ Pawn has bought coins for years — and even he was fooled. Unlike most counterfeits, the coins did not all have the same dates. One was a super rare 1893S, worth thousands and thousands."
HA !
Either way, whilst I do appreciate them giving up their weekends trying to save my sinful backside, I'm always reminded of one particular episode of the 'Johnny Nemo' cartoon
(Loud banging on door. Johnny opens it.)
"Are you ready to open your heart, to receive God ?"
"I wouldn't open my wallet, to receive money, at this bloody time of day !"
I've searched but been unable to find a legal definition of when a consumer good changes from 'new' to 'used', does anyone know one ? ~ I think AC is being what is known in the retail trade as a 'whinging bastard' : if (for example) I go into a shoe shop, try on a pair of shoes and walk ten steps in them before rejecting them, no-one could reasonably argue with the retailer that those shoes were now 'used' (even though they *had* been used, for about 30 seconds). Is there a definite cutoff point, or is it a legal grey area ?
Paris, cos she knows about soiled goods.
You are sadly confusing Scots English (which is a form of English which is spoken by Scottish people) with Gaelic, which is a Celtic language.
The Germanic (i.e. including English) and Celtic language families both split off from the parent tongue of Indo-European several thousand years B.C. (as did, for example, Latin, Greek, and Slavic). So Gaelic (and the other Celtic languages) doesn't sound much like *anybody's* English because they have been separate for at least 5,000 years, probably far longer.
That's why the only long-term solution is to build some space craft, get the hell off this crowded mudball, and start colonising the rest of the universe (sorry, Native Sirians, but you're first in the path of the human bulldozers).
C'mon people, it's not rocket science.
A Cymro writes :
Technically speaking, you are indeed correct - and by the same logic, *England* is not a country - it is all constitutionally one country (under the Statute of Rhuddlan), whose name is "England & Wales". (This has never been changed, which is why 'devolution' gave the Scottish parliament far more powers - because Scotland *is* a country in its own right.) It would be more correct to refer to them both as 'nations'.
I'll only mention in passing the argument that as a bloke from Anglesey whupped the ass of the English king at Bosworth Field and took the crown, it's really us that govern you (well we would do if the crown hadn't passed to some Scots and then some Germans)
Mine's the one with the "Close-Harmony-Singing Terrorist's Handbook" in the pocket...
...nearly half the world still believe that 9/11 was NOT an inside job orchestrated by the CIA to give the neo-con administration an excuse to invade some oil-rich countries, ride rough-shod over civil liberties, and give a huge boost to fascist parties.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks_opinion_polls
How come there's only 6 categories ? Surely "taking photographs" and "protesting" need categories of their own, as most arrests these days seem to stem from those two activities?
Also, had to laugh at the intro on the news last night - "From midnight tonight, a new police service will be available to residents of England & Wales..." Thank feck for that, cos the previous one was SHITE.
Forgive me for my ignorance, but I understood "Ireland" to be the big island a bit West of Britain (not, not America...not that far West...), and "Irish" to mean any person or thing originating from there.
How exactly has the Republic stolen these words ? Seems to me it’s more a case that *some* Irish people refuse to accept that they live in Ireland and they are Irish, insisting instead that they are natives of the island that their ancestors left long ago.
"if you ever make a complaint...it will appear on your CRB check"
I'm not a lawyer, but that smells like bullshit to me. I've never needed a CRB check myself, but I've seen various friends' records (as they have to work in schools occasionally) and they don't include details like "in 1998 he dialled 999 to report..."
...will people learn to preface anything potentially libellous with "IMHO" ?
E.g.
"IMHO, X is a a drug-pushing prostitute"
or
"IMHO, Y is a drugged-up loser who is only really famous for having a dead husband and is so far up her own backside it's a wonder she hasn't ruptured the space-time continuum yet"
See how I averted having an expensive lawsuit slapped on *me* ?
IANAL (I am not a landlord) but this does probably mean that every pub cash till in the country will have to be replaced, with ones that have options of 'pint', 'half-pint' and 'somewhere-in-between', at a stonking great cost.
The board of National Cash Registers are probably drinking to this already.
It's short for "sic in originam" - "thus (it is) in the original", meaning "I've not copied it wrong, that's what the original author wrote" (back before parchments had a cut-n-paste option). Any explanations like 'spelling is correct' are just backronyms.
There's now a wonderful fantasy scenario in my head, of 'Hardcase' Ireland and the rest of the PIIGS Gang, bullying Germany for its lunch money in the EU playground...
"Whaddya mean, ye've only got 20 billion in yer pocket today ?" >Thwack< "Ye better get us some more tomorra !"
A boffin knows proper stuff, about technical things, they may even invent a few more technical things. They are the giants on whose shoulders future generations will stand.
A Prof is just someone who couldn't stop being a student, and got some certificates to show what a great student they were. A Prof of Twaddle ("Media and Culture") was presumably a student of Yadder and Blah, not Things, so she's well below Beaker-level on the Boffin Scale.
(That's not to decry her conclusion about Google, but my cat could have told me that.)
...and may God have mercy on my soul.
But as various previous posters (eg Steve13 @ 10:41, Ken Hagan @ 10:49, and copsewood) have said, if you send a message to someone (whether email or hard-copy), that message becomes theirs. You have given it away. And if the recipient wants Google to show them some adverts with the message, so that the service becomes free to them, that's their choice to make.