the X Factor is basically an hour-long product placement
Luckily, though, nobody watches that drivel. Right?
943 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Jun 2009
Wow, fair bit of hate around for this woman. From what I've heard of her, she seems refreshingly honest. Which you you prefer - a straight "yeah, that was me," or the weasel mouthed "but I didn't inhale" type of answer we've come to expect from politicians? Sticking the answer out in public may seem like publicity hunting, or it may be a very effective way of castrating the "journalist" trying to corner her.
"The car achieved speeds exceeding 175 km/h on the German Autobahn, with a mean distance between human interventions of 9 km."
While very impressive, it could not cope in driverless mode in unexpected conditions, and is far from mature. Just because early prototypes existed 15 years ago doesn't mean the technology is mature. And yes, it could overtake, but only with approval from the driver, on a motorway.
As others have said, and despite what you want to believe, this is next level stuff, and is cutting edge, new and exciting technology. If you disagree, maybe you should go back to reading science fiction novels.
I think the key is in this sentence: "It will tell you if your machine is overheating and disable its external power supply if it is."
that seems to say it will disable the DC input until such time as Toshiba load a new firmware to re-enable it.
If that's true, it means that from when you load the new firmware, you have exactly as much juice as is in your battery until you'll need to return it for fixing.
Summarised in two sentences:
'The Afghanistan mission’s low public salience has allowed French and German leaders to disregard popular opposition and steadily increase their troop contributions. [But] if domestic politics forces the Dutch to depart, politicians elsewhere might cite a precedent for “listening to the voters.”'
It's only fair that we should pay a tax for how much we use the road. Obviously bigger, heavier vehicles should pay more. I guess you could administer this based entirely on vehicle usage - say, by taxing the fuel.
On top of that, a one-off slap-in-the-wallet every year, scaled to make people think about whether they really need that Chelsea Tractor, would probably go a long way to reducing overall vehicle sizes. A large one-off large yearly payment stings more than small incremental fuel bills, so it makes you think more.
Sounds like a good system to me.
Nothing wrong with a charity opposing trafficking.
Nothing wrong with that charity being aware of the link between trafficking and prostitution.
And finally, nothing wrong with said charity pointing out rank hypocrisy in local papers.
I must have missed the bit you're objecting to.
seems to be a company entirely built on buzz words, marketing a material (not even a product) which is not a liquid, with a trademark that is about as novel as belly button fluff.
Their "technology" page starts with:
"Liquidmetal® alloys are a revolutionary class of materials that redefines performance and cost paradigms."
Forgive me if I don't get excited.