Uninstall maps then reinstall it when you are past the border.
688 posts • joined 22 Jun 2009
nic.org is an old folks home.
nic.uk doesn't exist, neither does nic.co.uk
nic.us looks like a legit agency as does nic.com (although their site and logo are pretty fugly).
Have I misunderstood the article or what?
"immediate, ongoing irreparable harm that Apple is suffering,"
Why stop there how about:
"immediate, long term, archival, multi generational, ongoing, irreparable, fiscal critical, patent infringing harm that Apple is being brutally, painfully, permanently subjected to, causing great suffering, financial loss and IP destruction."
Or they could just write <insert QQ here>
"This isn't about sharing technology, it's about establishing a strong corporate monopoly which keeps out new innovators with our combined patent portfolio. Between our patents prohibiting the use of the letter x or i and the patents on white plastic we are confident we can establish a decades long hegemony" Apple's intellectual property licensing director Boris Teksler did not tell the San Jose court.
like to complain about other things too. It's like everyone one of them has their particular solution in mind and none of them are willing to consider others.
I propose we build nothing but:
nuclear power plants in the UK
solar power plants in Australia
Geothermal plants in the US
Wind power plants in Russia
Coal power in China
And tidal power in Germany (as a punitive measure for all the wars they've started).
Then we can see which population dies off last and conclude the most effective power source.
If you are considering legislation, stop it. Then go look up existing laws and see if you can find one that covers it already. If you still can't then go and find 10 laws that are outdated, bureaucratic or authoritarian and get them stripped from the books. Once you have gotten rid of 10 retarded old laws you can have 1 new one.
Vote Thomas18 today, for a less bureaucratic / more monomaniacal tomorrow
Kickstarter Patent/Copyright Trolling
For £100 you will get 0.01% of any settlements
For £1000 you will get an official Proview IPAD (registered trademark)
For £5000 you will get 1 free spurious patent
For £1,000,000 you can choose the next lawsuit
For £10,000,000 you can buy a [a class="hide"]judge[/a] tshirt
March 30th 2012
[...] the Home Affairs Committee makes three recommendations, all of which are aimed at remedying perceived imbalances in the treaty:
1. US prosecutors should be required to establish "probable cause" of the alleged offence in a UK court, which is the same information threshold that UK extradition requests must satisfy in the US.
2. US prosecutors should be required to present an evidential case against defendants so that the evidence can be tested in a UK court.
3. The proposed "forum" bar should be introduced into the Extradition Act 2003, which would allow the decision about whether a matter should be prosecuted in the US or the UK to be taken by a judge in open court after listening to the defendant's representations.
References, or it didn't happen
Did you read the whole article? it says that experienced techies weren't able to remove the battery without puncturing it. That means it cannot "be gotten apart safely".
Green is not only about assembly and disposal it's also about how easy it is to maintain. Apple products are designed to last till 1 day after the warranty and be as un-user serviceable as possible.
Hence the big black mark.
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021