Probably helped
...having the BBC acting as advertisers for them.
477 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Jun 2009
They don't want to compare bare metal with VM performance because it isn't good. I've done quite a lot of tests myself with KVM, Xen and Solaris zones. I have to say VM performance is very poor compared to bare metal and I'd have to advise against running a database in a VM if you're serious about performance.
I still remember when SAN was first introduced and we were told we didn't need to worry about where we put our data anymore, the SAN would take care of it and guarantee performance......... the results were, to say the least, disappointing.
The sad thing is, here I am today, many years later and at most sites I see the same old problems with SAN performance. A number of sites have gone back to local disks for performance using DB technology like replication to handle availability. I've got to say I can see why. It's easier to get good performance and a lot cheaper.
So, sadly, I'm sceptical that ECS is even worth looking at.
Not really, they screw up their bit and then tell someone else to buy something based on dodgy info thus losing the company millions.......
Having worked for a few banks where that has happened I noticed that most of them were banning spreadsheets or bringing them under version control.
MS were found guilty at the time and ordered to take certain actions which they haven't done (not in full). They also appealed and did everything they could to delay things in the first place.
So, while it is true that IE market share is fairly small today, the "punishment" is in response to MS actions and IE's position at the time of the case.
As for accusations of the EU taking US money...... hello Mr Pot, this is Mr Kettle, are you aware of your colour?
I'm not sure Quantum is the worst, did you see "View to a kill"? It wasn't that great though. I suppose I'm willing to give him time as he has done another one and I think he's signed up to do more, plus I liked "Layer Cake" :-)
I like the idea that he (Craig) is trying something different. It worked fairly well in Casino Royale, it was so so in Quantum so I'm looking to Skyfall to see if the character matures and finaly builds on what they've started.
Well Moore was my favourite as I saw him playing Bond first. However, once I was in my twenties I grew to prefer Connery.
Lazenby wasn't in long enough to be sure.
Moore was... well Roger Moore although the bad guy's line in Moonraker almost saved it "I'm going to put you out of my misery Mr. Bond".
Dalton was given crap films so I can't vote for him.
Brosnan was good in his first two but gradually went down hill.
Craig... hmmmm... difficult to say. I liked him in Layer Cake and if you accept that he is trying something new I think he's quite good.
So, Connery first followed by Craig/Brosnan as joint second.
BTW I think the film Ronin has the highest number of Bond bad guys in it without being a Bond film.
I think he was joking, in case you missed it.
To your other point: I've visited Wales quite a lot and have several Welsh friends. I've only ever come across three people who spoke Welsh as a first language (all as children but all of them had migrated to English as they got older). I've met loads who speak it, many who speak it fluently but only three who speak it as a first language. I've never heard of any who couldn't speak English. Do such people really exist?
I'm not trying to make a point about the point of teaching Welsh, that's for another day, I'm just curious :-)
I think the whole thing goes round in circles.
1. Let's have a centralised system that everyone uses.
The system is late, over budget and doesn't do what is needed.
2. Let's have distributed systems that talk together.
They don't talk very well, the overall results is higher costs. Someone says, "why don't we have a centralised system to save costs so we don't keep re-inventing the wheel".............
Perhaps the problem behind both approaches is poor management by the government and poorly defined requirements.
Of course the statement from the scientist has already had work done to it. The science will have said that it may be possible to toughen wheat to be slightly more resistant to the cold at the cost of lower yields and that there are probable side effects for other plants and wildlife in the area.
The announcement will say "we now know how to make wheat viable in cold climates".
Sorry Geoff, what passes for my brain read your joke in the form in which I first heard it (which was two stops on from Barking).
I also heard people being referred to as "Upminster" and I found http://www.oedilf.com/db/Lim.php?Word=beyond%20Barking. I suppose it's what my Cornish cousins would call " a bit Bodmin".
your comments on Wikileaks seem a bit puerile as if you were determined to misinterpret them.
It would be interesting to see what would happen if the US said they weren't interested in the man concerned. Then we'd see if he's fleeing justice or avoiding becoming the victim of a witch hunt.
the issue is so much about blocking of access to sites and accounts which are raising tensions and could be considered as inciting violence. The problem is that the Indian government doesn't appear to be acting within the law and are taking the opportunity to shut sites that don't agree with them under the guise of what could be considered legitimate action.
Hmmm, I haven't fallen for that one since my early teens!
The reality is that all ads are ineffective and mobile ones which provide a level of irritation are even less so.
Examples: I remember the R Whites ad from the 70s but I've never brought the product, same goes for milk tray. Jumping forward I even quite like the Meerkat and Plus Net ads but have never bought or used their services.
I understand the idea behind brand awareness, so it could be argues that my remembering the names is a victory but it is a bit of a hollow victory if I don't then buy the product or consider it more favourably.... and that's for ads I like! I have the strong suspicion that most people work this way too.
but I couldn't see anything exceptional about it (apart from the lack of ads). The extra channels were very good but if you didn't have access to them the coverage could be a bit disjointed as they either flicked around a lot or spent a lot of time on build ups to events while ignoring others.
I also can't help but feel that it is unlikely that more than 90% of the population watched the Olympics. I suspect this to be an anomaly of the system they use to guess viewing figures.
I did watch some of it from abroad and I can't say the coverage was much different, apart from being biased towards events where that country felt it would do well!
I'm all in favour of the TV license but this was a fairly easy win for the BBC.
"Current and past governments have failed to understand the importance of broadband to Britain's future prosperity"
Not sure that there's much evidence to suggest that broad band has any effect on prosperity. It provides convenience for some things but buying a book via a Web Site instead of a local shop doesn't make us richer, for example.
On the subject of TV via the internet: I don't see this working well in rural communities where there is often no, or limited ADSL and no mobile signal either.
and of course people never buy things they don't need!
My point was that I couldn't see what I'd use one for and no-one I spoke to who owned one for any length of time could put their finger on anything they really needed one for.
Most people said they used it as a music player or occasional camera but they also said they'd got dedicated music players they preferred and dedicated cameras they used in preference.
Oh, quite a lot said work gave them out and expected them to respond to e-mails on them when they were not working.... which I can do without :-)
I'm not saying they're useless rubbish just that I can't see the point and no-one I've spoken to has been able to come up with anything either.
As I said in my first comment... each to their own.
Each to their own and all that but I still can't see why I'd want to spend 300 quid on a smart phone. I can't find anything in the article which describes something it does which I really really want or need.
I had a quick chat around the office and with some mates and most seem to buy these things and then, after an initial period of playing with the new gadget, not really know what to do with them.
that the council are basically saying one of:
1) We're so incompetent at managing these 300 people that we can push them off to another company and that other company can still do the current job and make a profit.
2) We're so incompetent that we didn't notice that the new contract is actually costing us more than keeping this in house.
On the other hand perhaps it's a bit of both!
From what I remember he was accused and then it was withdrawn and then he was accused again and then a charge added... all sounds a bit odd to me.
It also seems strange that the Swedish prosecutor has turned down all offers to speak to him to ask the questions they want to ask.
He doesn't strike me as a nice person but these charges do sound rather trumped up so I'm not surprised he doesn't want to go to Sweden.
....or if the company insists on putting a piece of software on the users nice shiny toy and bricks it. I think the usert is going to expect the company to pay.
Then there's the grey are in between where the user says the company's software or advised change has bricked the device or borken it in some way.......
I've also found Google Maps to be pretty useless. I had to map a couple of hundred addresses for on customer and it got about 10% wrong, one was even put on the wrong continent, despite having a UK post code!
I then tried using them to find the hotel I was going to stay at and the office I had to go to when visiting a client site. It got both wrong by about 1 or 2 km, which is hopeless in a big city!
but.... I've never seen serious problems in a project due to the source control tool. Even sccs does the job. The problem always comes from people not using the tool and not following any kind of change control process so source control becomes "whatever we find in production".
(if you ignore the silliness about the Euro) but the problem with price differentiation is when your customers find out or have it rubbed in their faces. Say I'm an IT directory at a €30 business and I land a new job at a €300 business. I'm going to try and make a name for myself by pushing the price down. The board may even be so pissed off about it that they chuck out Microsoft altogether.
I've seen ti happen!