It's not my fault I was designed to kill
"Countless other 'murder' weapons" are designed for purposes other than killing things.
3547 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Jun 2009
The entire MF market has been shrinking for the last few decades, particularly recently as many photographers realise they can achieve the same results with much cheaper and much, much higher tech FF 35mm digital systems from Canon and Nikon.
There are photographers who need the resolution of MF digital backs and know exactly how to use them to balance aliasing with detail, but they are few and far between. Everyone else gets a 1Ds MkIII or a D3X because they are fantastic cameras backed by fantastic systems.
If you'd like to believe 2048x1536 (or 1740x1100 as we shall see below) is equivalent to 2560x1600 then knock yourself out.
You have a screen with (as far as I can tell) a horizontal pixel pitch of 0.21mm. As a result the largest meaningful horizontal resolution you can get out of it is roughly 1740 pixels. It also has a 0.25mm vertical pixel pitch, so the largest meaningful vertical resolution is about 1100 pixels. The reason you don't get aliasing when you exceed these values is that the electron beam isn't tight enough, so the pixels just blend together.
Also flat screen != flat panel.
"I will consider 3D when I don't need active glasses that cost $200 a pair. Why can't they use the passive glasses that you get in the theatre? Because they DON'T cost $200!"
Alternate polarisation of left- and right-eye frames as used with common passive glasses poses some technical issues on LCD screens.
"One of the drawback of such levels of EMP discharge on a mobile platform, either on land or sea will be the biological side effects on crew!"
Really?
"(the US Navy already has prior history with messing about with High EMP projects on warships, they didn't go down too well with the crews health)"
Which projects were those?
"The big Battle ships of WW2 also required evacuation of all open upper decks when the big guns were being fired or the shockwave would splash the crew over the bulkheads or overboard."
That's because their projectiles were propelled by rapidly expanding gas.
In some jurisdictions selling a ticket for more than its face value or a nominal percentage above its face value - scalping - is illegal.
The terms of sale for some events limit the number of tickets a person can buy. Buying up hundreds of them is quite obviously a breach of this part of the customer's contract with the promoter.
Etc. etc. etc.
Eight to ten hours. I usually wait until I believe the price is reasonable before buying any COD game because their single player campaigns are almost criminally short.
This is one of the greatest disappointments for this kind of game. When the game reverts to single player only in a few years because the servers have been shut down, will all the reviewers be revising their scores down to account for the fact?
"We can however tell where coltan comes from, as a result of this project. (Ignore their estimate that 50 per cent of the world's Ta comes from DRC: it's more like eight per cent.)"
So we're being told to believe one piece of information from a given source, but without any references to the contrary, we're also being told in the same breath to ignore another piece of information from the same source. Hmm.
""while sipping some of their best brews."
Now there's your first problem ..."
It would be an unusual situation if a random sample didn't have a "best"...
That said, we've got good beer, just like the UK, USA and any number of other countries have good beer. And just like the UK, USA and any number of other countries, most people choose to drink the bad stuff.
While we're tossing beery hand grenades, the best bitter I've tasted actually came from the USA.
(Never fear, your joke still got a chuckle out of me.)
You can knock the appearance back down to Win2k, but many parts of the interface have changed. They seem to have tried to simplify things, which annoys me as it makes a lot of things I used to like to be able to do more difficult or even impossible. They also renamed a bunch of stuff so you can't find what you're looking for and don't know what you're looking at.
There are certainly improvements to some of the things it does, but they don't outweigh the annoyances IMO.
"Google has tested the format by re-encoding 1,000,000 existing web images, mostly JPEGs, GIFs, and PNGs, and it saw a 39 per cent reduction in average file size."
Well it wouldn't surprise me if applying lossy compression to 24bit PNGs resulted in a reduction in file size. It would surprise me if it didn't.
How about you give us something unambiguous Google?
At the same time as ZA was spamming me with this garbage, Avast! was reminding me of talk like a pirate day.
AVG went to hell around version 8. Its previous behaviour on opening a directory full of potential threat vectors (e.g. a directory containing hundreds of assorted installers) was to block access to the files while it scanned them. As of version 8 it seemed to start blocking access to the entire directory, and in some cases caused explorer.exe to stop working while it was scanning the directory contents. Nuts to that.
Go to hell ZA. Time to look for a new firewall.
Because it would cost twice as much. Full frame sensors aren't cheap.
And before someone trots out Moore's Law to "prove" that they will quickly become orders of magnitude cheaper than they are today, no matter what you do to the size of a transistor, a full frame sensor is still 36mm x 24mm.
Also speaking as a Canon user, this should give them a kick up the arse. This does look likely to occupy a price point above the 60D however. I have a feeling the 60D will in time dispell some of the initial, and I believe irrational, disappointment, but I'd be seriously looking at the D7000 if I weren't wedded to Canon.
Now pardon me while I go out and buy that 7D I've been eyeing off for so long.
The imaging area of four thirds is 17.3 mm x 13.0 mm = 224.9 mm².
The imaging area of Sony style APS-C sensors is 23.6 mm x 15.8 mm = 372.9 mm², or 66% larger than 4/3. Even if you're only talking linear dimensions it's still 29% on average. The maths isn't that hard.
My thumbnail's bigger than four thirds, and I just trimmed it.
I have no idea where you got that from. This is state politics, the federal "Aussie gov" is not involved and doesn't even care.
It's scandalous because of the hypocrisy of an ultra-right wing bible thumping parliamentarian, who spends his time trying to ban everything that might make people happy because it's "impure," caught looking at porn.
Oh but it's okay because it's for "research" purposes. Right.