Re: RET plan
I have a feeling that the creation of a nuclear energy industry from scratch here would be a boondoggle of proportions as yet unseen in this country.
3553 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Jun 2009
I bought a reasonably large TV from a local retailer a few years ago and when it was delivered to my house I observed that it had been stabbed through the heart by a forklift at the warehouse.
Obviously this is mostly irrelevant but at least a bicycle might have survived...
It was, perhaps perversely, that five figure Apple watch that rekindled my interested in wristwatches, when I began to research what mechanical timekeeping devices you could get within that price limit. Being right on the edge of "high end" territory, a whole world opened up.
So thanks Apple.
My understanding is that "water resistant to 30 metres(/3 bar/3 atm)" is static pressure resistance. Start moving about and things change very quickly.
This is why the manual for a wristwatch that is rated to 30 metres usually informs the owner that it's not suitable for swimming, at any depth.
Some people just like to drive.
Granted. I count myself among that some, but I also wouldn't mind a car that can drive itself when I don't want to (e.g. congested urban areas, long distance travel).
Some people don't trust the automation so they're going to want to drive.
And some people still don't trust airliners despite a proven safety record. This will be a generational change.
There’s no software designer in the world that's ever going to be smart enough to anticipate all the potential circumstances this software is going to encounter.
That's what testing is for. Is an Apollo Program analogy too much of a cliché here?
I can give you an example I've seen mentioned in several places. My automated car is confronted by an 80,000 pound truck in my lane. Now the car has to decide whether to run into this truck and kill me, the driver, or to go up on the sidewalk and kill 15 pedestrians.
Presumably not a self-driving truck. This is a bit of a furphy IMNSHO, but why has this old railcar thought experiment lately increased from 5 to 10 to 15 pedestrians? Why not go for 50 or 100?
A self-driving vehicle is not a philosopher. All it has to do is lessen the severity of a collision, no matter how contrived the circumstance, and it's proven its value. If it can avoid the collision entirely, perhaps only by seeing the errant 80,000 pound truck well before a human would have, so much the better.
Do you often drive over 300 miles non-stop to visit the in-laws and then leave again 15 minutes later? You're tough to please if an EV with a range (380 miles for the P100D) that accommodates probably 99% of trips doesn't impress you yet! Facetiousness aside, what it does need is for prices to come down dramatically and widespread fast charging infrastructure.
I'll wait until Jeremy Clarkson takes it around the track explaining it to us, then lets the Stig time a lap.Then I'll be impressed.
You'll probably be waiting a while for Clarkson to return to the BBC...
I should probably say "...with the service that kills the market" as people probably wouldn't buy a personal car to share with strangers; they'd subscribe to a car-sharing service like the one Ford et al. are working on.
I suspect uptake is going to take long enough that the industry has sufficient time to pivot and no excuses.
As we saw not too long ago it can be effectively taken out of action by a bored guy with a couple of hundred dollars.
If "state sponsored attackers" wanted to bring it down it would be gone by now, but the community is so hilariously awful that they don't need any help in wrecking it from governments.