Re: Stupidity plus arrogance
This isn't stupidity, it's ignorance
3826 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Jun 2009
We will actually be debating if we shall go from 10 to 12 or from 10 to 11, depending on hardware and suchHaving dipped my toe in the penguin's pond and found it inviting, before opting to stick with Windows 10 for now (via IoT Enterprise LTSC), I think I've already made the decision on where to go once support runs out in 2032. I just can't see Microsoft backpedalling so hard and far that Windows 11 or its successor, whatever that might be, will ever be an option for anyone even slightly concerned about privacy and control over their own systems.
(Look at me, evangelising Linux without even using it...)
For Win10, Vanilla support ended oct 2025, ESU for consumers (first time it is offered to consumers) will end on oct 2027, ESU for bussiness will end on oct 2028, and IoT support will end on Jan 2032 (the OS launched in Jul 2015)So, again, complain to the seller of the device for choosing the wrong version of Windows, not to Microsoft.
What's different in Windows 10 IoT (Enterprise... LTSC... 2021) that makes all other versions of Windows 10 impossible to also support until 2032?
Absolutely blame Microsoft.
Fortunately there are ways to in-place upgrade an existing Windows 10 install to IoT Enterprise LTSC 2021.
A spreadsheet that doesn't handle tables (and I'm not talking about a database table, just a two dimensional array of data) is a very strange concept indeed!
I dabbled with OnlyOffice briefly but bounced off it when I discovered that it's only designed to resemble MS Office. The functionality is noticeably different and a lot of things that you can customise or modify in MS Office are hardcoded in OO. It was frustrating to get used to both things that looked identical behaving differently and the loss of functionality.
As every Reg reader knows, there are fantastic FOSS answers for office productivityI have a fairly rudimentary OOXML spreadsheet that brings LibreOffice Calc to its knees. It contains is a single relatively small table of data, a few basic calculations, a row filter and some conditional formatting. It's baffling.
Short interest in SpaceX appears to be 17%. A lot of people betting that it's overvalued, but fewer than I'd expected to be honest.
For comparison, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta and Microsoft are all around 1%.
Even Gamestop, which once had a short interest greater than 100% (leading to a short squeeze, a pump & dump and endless hilarious financial conspiracy theories), is now "only" 14%.
Is that the popular opinion?
The bubble is the fact that several hundred billion dollars has so far been poured into it based mostly on hype, promises and desperation. The technology can't do most of what its salespeople and boosters would have you believe it can do, the companies doing the "AI" still haven't figured out how to make it profitable, most of that money simply gets turned into entropy and depreciation (as opposed to useful infrastructure) and those investors will want a return someday. The bubble bursts when the money hose is turned off and everyone's left standing around counting their losses. It isn't a commentary on the technology itself, merely the wild disconnect between the hopes and dreams people are attaching to it and reality.
Haven't played Destiny 2 in years for example but that appears to be staying online for the forseeable. I guess we'll see how long that actually remains up.This was always the question but I think it became a more interesting one when they had to dramatically increase server capacity the day it transitioned into maintenance mode, if Steamcharts is to be believed.
The content is still being sold on all platforms, although given recent live service debacles that's no guarantee it remains up, either. I think it all hinges on whether Bungie survives Marathon...
That's especially true as a lot of Windows refugees are being pointed to CachyOS as a high performance option for gaming, so a lot of inexperienced users are switching to it without understanding the intricacies of package management, and the potential dangers.As one of those refugees I experimented with Cachy quite a bit recently and liked it a lot because it didn't prevent me from doing much and I could use the latest versions of everything, but I found the AUR confusing in a way. I needed to use it for a few things (e.g. Google Earth), but it comes with fairly hefty warnings that essentially contradict this necessity and it seems ripe for exploitation.
No but it will totally tell its creators how not to go bankrupt and then how to cure cancer Real Soon Now™
Starship and Super Heavy have certainly been pushing the envelope from day one, and (I assume) a lot of the testing has been for things that are difficult to simulate. I wonder if the company has developed the attitude that there's no problem it can't solve. It would make sense, with a tech bro at the helm.
And for what? So far the only viable application suggested has been the delivery of larger Starlink satellites to orbit and some "if you build it, they will come" style statements about lifting the size limitations current launch systems place on satellites.
SpaceX currently operates one of the most reliable orbital class rockets in history.
In contrast to SpaceX, Blue Origin seems to have more of an "old space" corporate culture. It took billions of dollars and more than ten years of development before New Glenn made its first flight. Lack of caution or "rationality" aren't things the company can be accused of.
I was recently searching through some archived project directories on my employer's project server for traces of work I couldn't remember doing and found a directory that was about 50 GB larger than it should have been. One of the people working on the project was using a subdirectory within their area of responsibility as personal file storage. It looked like their entire life was in there. Then the project got moved from the active server to the archive server, so all of those personal files are now preserved forever and accessible by anyone with access to that drive, which is essentially everyone in the company.
Atheism, like theism, is not a philosophical position. It's a matter of faith, i.e., a deeply held personal conviction or belief.Believing in something you cannot prove the existence of is faith. So far so good. I hope you can see where I'm going with this.
Per google:
Just one year after its debut, AI Mode has surpassed one billion monthly users, with queries more than doubling every quarter since launch.Of course this is all bullshit. It's visible to everyone who uses the search page so of course everyone who selects the first "result" (whether they realise it's confabulated spam or not) is counted as a "user". Or possibly even everyone who loads a results page.
(icon for google)
The generative AI industry's margins are currently universally negative, except for when they're not doing their accounting properly. They're propped up by external funding.
"But Alphabet, Microsoft etc. are profitable!"
Of course they are but wouldn't you think that if their generative AI divisions were also profitable, they'd be shouting it from the rooftops rather than hiding it?
So why don't you install it in a VM and check it yourself?
The answer is that "Windows Classic" appears in the themes list but doesn't work, instead it applies a dark version of the Windows 7 Aero theme when selected. Likewise for the high contrast themes. Maybe they're on the to do list but this is an interesting project regardless.