Re: Simple
That's already happening. And not just that, but Ukraine has an input into NATO (plus the Aussies and Kiwis) training their troops - i.e. you don't want just the British army designing the basic training for how to survive against drones on the battlefield. You want to learn that from Ukraine. There's also higher level training going on in France, and some other NATO countries, and again, we're getting input from Ukraine on drone stuff. So while helping to train Ukrainian troops and junior officers, we're getting them to train us.
Also, I've seen jealous comments from US security think tankers and journalists, that Britain has got a few boots on the ground in Ukraine. Not in actual combat, but embedded around the place as liaison and observers, possibly also some technical advisors? From what I know, and what the German government have said, I don't think targetting for Storm Shadow is possible without a lot of NATO intel, databases and software. It's 20 years old, so the software could be 30 years old, and I suspect we've not handed all that over, but have an embedded team programming the missiles with all the digital infrared images it needs to match its flightpath to the terrain and hit the target.
Finally we've got lots of industrial partnerships going on. We're joint leads on the Ukrainian Navy and short range air defence. Which means we've had guys on the ground learning, and Ukrainians here as part of specifying the kit. We've built or designed some of the anti-ship drones Ukraine has used, and have worked on some Franken-SAMs (bodging Western air-to-air missiles and SAMs into ex-Soviet launchers - and shed-engineering new launchers too), as well as anti-drone drones and anti-drone cannons.
I quite like this as a cheap initiative. Start small and try to get it right, before scaling up. We're unlikely to have a huge drone building industry, but could get ourselves a good design industry - and then subsidise some building capacity with military orders.