Re: @Glen 1 - UK PM Tony Blair lied about WMD in Irak
I would make a distinction between a government dossier being "sexed up" for political ends and a foreign power killing on British soil with apparent impunity (although international sanctions have upped the ante a little)
"The Government" is a many headed hydra. It's not so much "The Government" I believe, but the news reporting on the government - and I mean actual journalists holding politicians to account, not tweet bots, not disposable domains running click bait headlines over facebook. That would seem to make me (and many others here) different from the huddled masses.
I mean, I only have the news' word that Vladimir Putin actually exists. I've never met the man - or met anyone who has - but between the video footage, and eyewitness accounts (all coming from the news), I'm prepared to believe that he exists.
There is *slightly* less evidence about the above attacks. Between the death of Dawn Sturgess and interviews with Yulia Skripal, Charlie Rowley etc there is certainly more than a single primary source. The thoroughly unconvincing interview on Russian media with the suspects only adds fuel to the fire. Not to mention the Russian agents getting caught outside the swiss lab that was testing the Novichok samples.
However, I view those sources through the filter of the news just like everyone else.