Re: actual intelligence
Dumb Europeans too.
It's not like we are immune to the new shiny.
967 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Jun 2009
Are you getting some mirror universe news over there?
Sending in the marines for the "emergency" of falling crime?
Demanding the national guard be sent in to democrat strongholds because he doesn't like the peaceful protests?
Sends in his goons, and *makes sure* they are no longer peaceful.
That's before we talk about Jan 6th, Melissa Hortman, Kyle Rittenhouse or violence against trans people.
Admittedly, the left is not entirely innocent. However, the things that the left initiates (eg BLM) are a reaction to people either being murdered, or advocating for murder.
The most damming and depressing thing is that we're now having to keep score of the body count to see who the 'least bad' is.
The point being That people such as yourselves believing that the two are inevitably linked are stupid.
So off-the-wall detached from reality that the rest of us find it hard to take you seriously.
Which of course, you dismiss as far left propaganda and your people continue to die through your inaction, while racking up life destroying amounts of medical debt.
But hey, you saved those imaginary 100million right?
The same way "Hey compiler, write me some machine code because I'm not educated enough or too lazy to do it myself." does. How many remember the days of compiler bugs?
'Hey garbage collector, handle my memory management for me because I'm not educated enough or too lazy to do it myself"
Snobs sneering at interpreted languages as not "real" or "toy" languages?
It's turtles all the way down. AI is just another turtle, which has admittedly a long way to go before we trust it the way we trust a compiler. As for actually checking the output - that's literally part of our job. No less than checking what we ourselves wrote.
We are getting paid to solve problems, not show everyone how clever we are.
"what passed for chocolate in pre brexit UK."
Nce tasting chocolate? Or are you one of those who think chocolate has to taste bitter to count?
Compare Cadburys to Hersheys and I know which side I'd bet on all day. Even post Mondelez takeover.
Just don't mention the shrinkflation. The price of Freddos these days *mutters*
I can't program operating systems, but I can install Linux in (well) under an hour. Should I not do that?
I can't write a compiler, but I have GCC installed. Should I not do that?
I can't implement my own python interpreter, but have python installed. Should I not do that?
I can't implement my own encryption, but use SSH. Should I not do that?
Facetious, I'll admit - but even with the most control-freak interpretation of open source, there comes a point where you are trusting someone else's code.
I think the problem lies in that xkcd.
The big companies are betting the farm on (say) openSSL (either knowingly or unknowingly) and seem to think it's someone else's problem when there's a zero day.
Given such libraries levels of importance to the underpinning of modern society, you've thought there would be a commensurate amount of investment in the the care and maintenance.
Sadly, in many cases this is not true. Not only is it turtles all the way down, they're someone else's turtles.
There are already several devices that do what you describe.
The early versions are considered old hat because you couldn't "see through" them (think drone pov headsets)
As for being able to see around the screen:
Products by XREAL
Thinkreality by Lenovo
vIsor from immersed
Just the first few off the top of my head
Or...
Run proxmox on an Intel NUC based device
(I use an older NUC7PJYH )
Then you can run up as many VMS as you have ram/storage.
Cheaper than buying multiple pis and associated accessories.
OS choice becomes a non-issue.
Potentially fewer headaches when migrating to better hardware.
Need more CPU? Assign more cores or migrate to a beefier host.
Actual SSD speeds without extra accessories, no worrying about write cycles on your SD card
Backups can be just snapshots.
There are things pis are good for, but if you are using multiple in the same place, you are probably better off with one + a load of VMS.
That's my point.
When the rich are paying politicians to do you what *you* want. That's democracy in action.
Trying to have more checks and balances to keep such corruption in check? Lets stack the judiciary to remove the checks. Why, those checks are removing the power from duly elected officials! Muh FREEEDDUUUUMMM!!!
NRA, Big Pharma, Military industrial complex lobbying, the Church? Fine. Lobbying is part of politics -- Unions, BLM, LGBQT+ groups? Evil groomers, apparently
Elon Buying Twitter and turning it into a dumpster fire? That's capitalism Baby! -- Bill Gates spending billions on vaccinations? Evil! He must have an agenda!
Its the double standard that's funny.
--
In the UK we have conservatives complaining about Union donations to the Labour party. Without a scrap of self awareness.
*Their* donors are literally the people who "use their money to train a cohort of puppet politicians" - just look at the recent honours lists - or the Covid contracts. Where as the Union members are just regular voters who have to pool their funds to compete with the rich people. I am not naïve enough to think there won't be shenanigans when Labour are back in - but Unions are literally the people.
When finally, the UKs rich neo-cons manipulated the gov into producing the low-tax (and not quite yet) low-spend nirvana.... there were consequences. The people who *actually* own everything decided we were a bad investment. The resulting knock on effects wiped £300 Billion off the value of our stock and bond markets Source
Apparently, a cloud cukoo land policy meeting reality and failing to meet expectations must mean there is a conspiracy. I believe there is a warning about the dangers of capitalism in there somewhere
The WEF conspiracy theory angle always made me laugh.
You have people who genuinely believe the free market is king - but rich(er) people moving their money to do what *they* want rather than what *you* want is apparently unfair.
While *simultaneously* believing that the notion of world govs trying to *protect* the little guy from such moves is automatically evil - or worse, socialism.
Top laughs.
"ideal plans for loving, caring, mutually beneficial relationships"
That's what a lot of gay couples already have.
Trying to claim they "don't count" or "it's not real" because its not for you... then trying to rationalise it by referring to several thousand year old fairy tails.
How's that "not mixing of mixing of fabrics" coming along?
Basically trying to deny other people "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"
Spiteful
The difference between marriage being handed down by God, and it being a matter of Law, is largely a difference of record keeping.
Before said record keeping, many a young lady had been duped into thinking they were married, until the grooms *other* family was revealed a few villages over.
Still happens today, except we tend to have better records.
If you believe marriage is holy mumbo jumbo handed down by God, then its between the newlyweds (whatever their gender) and their maker, and none of *your* business (or the churches).
If you believe its 'not real' unless it happens in accordance with the church (whichever church) - then that *is* a matter of church law, by definition, and as such changeable under the mechanisms those churches provide. See also: the rules around divorce. Do second marriages count as marriages? The Pope "annulling" a marriage is somehow different?
Abusive spouse? Tough! Marriage is permanent in the eyes of god. (according to some sects)
Divorced after a year? Why not get married again? (according to other sects)
Make it make sense
When you have folks taking someone's umpteenth marriage (after umpteen divorces) more seriously than a gay couple who have been together most of their lives... It really makes it difficult to take certain religious types seriously.
History is littered with 'marriages' where the people involved were unable to give consent - or were only doing it for the legal status.
Children being married off?
Political marriages?
Green card marriages?
Shotgun weddings?
All of those taken more seriously than two consenting adults freely committing to spend the rest of their lives together.
Tell me you can at least see the disparity?
"At some point, you're arguing that businesses in this ruthless capitalist system we live in are deliberately forgoing profits and risking being out maneuvered by more inclusive competitors."
Yes, pretty much.
How many articles/comment threads have been full of stories of "Higher ups" not understanding the details of things they were making decisions on? How many "We told you so"s?
The competent little people often only get listened to if we're telling the boss something they want to hear. Look at Twitter...
Gender is an *extra* degree of separation away from those in the proverbial golf club.
"kids that are 7 to 8 years old"
So... an age where you *definitely* wouldn't let them go on the internet unsupervised, and who has the time to *properly* supervise? -- Or *properly* set up parental controls?
Well, us, but we are not the norm.
Instead people use walled-garden devices that are easier to lock down. oh look - Chromebooks and IPads. A mouse? is that like a separate trackpad? /s
For many of us, we nostalgically romanticise about our first taste of computing. BBC Basic, tape decks, doom/quake mods -- our whole careers and perhaps path of our lives were formed by playing with these systems as kids. When we hand our kids tablets to keep them entertained, it means Baby's-First-Operating-System is Android or IOS. Their first user interface is a touch screen. The first place they are likely to see technical information are in the settings pages of those devices. (What *is* your phone's IP address?)
As the current batch of kids grow up, they will have the same feelings of nostalgia about the current set of games and devices. We might be better off teaching them the underpinnings of what they are *actually* using, rather than sitting them in front of the 'Mom/Dad's Laptop' (that they rarely get to use) and trying to do it formally.
Want them to learn something else? 'Proper' Linux? Then give them *those* devices to play with. After all, that was literally the point of the Raspberry Pi.
How many of us come across grown adults who cant navigate a directory structure? People who are using a computer every day, but couldn't tell you where the Downloads folder actually is, or where to start looking for that document they just saved. You don't need a desktop operating system for that. That is something that can be taught to kids with phones/tablets - maybe a MicroSD card or two to introduce the concept of different drives.
Slightly off topic: I realise you were talking about *other people's* kids, but plug a mouse into that chrome book and set them loose on some (browser based?) games that take advantage... watch how fast their mouse skills improve. Quake 3 on the pi zero? Living room Lan party?
Related:
You start to run into similar issues with modern (but low specced) microcontrollers.
Not with variable names, but with strings.
If you declare a string literal to be written out over serial, (e.g. "Program got to here"™), the whole thing is written into ram before passing it on. When your dealing with 2k of RAM and no GC, a program that has lots of nice feedback soon fills up the available RAM. A trap for younger players, as it were.
The solution is to copy the string from flash/rom/progmem (which is usually in much greater supply). In the Arduino ecosystem, you have an F macro - so the above becomes:
serial.println(F("Program got to here"));
"Will we see France today?"
"Any day now Chuggy, any day now."
"Is Calais as beautiful as they say?"
"Oh the supermarkets go on for miles Chuggy, you'll love it"
There is a cost-benefit analysis to do.
The time it takes for your tech to get an ancient printer working with a new machine vs the cost of a new printer + consumables (+ time)
Bog standard old mono laser? If it doesn't work after pugging it in, and it takes you longer than 10 mins to find drivers, buy a new (different) printer.
Fancier printer with colour profiles, but standard sizes? *Maybe* buy the new printer - might be worth a few hours/days of fettling.
Specialist monster bulk/large format printer that would cost > 2 month's salary to replace (probably a *lot* more)? You spend the time.
If its your own time, and you view that time as free, then go ahead and knock yourself out.
The thresholds I used above are ones I just made up, so they may be different for your circumstances.
This development moves the thresholds for such decisions -- arguably not by much if you already do Linux printing.
That's fair...
The ASC that Cameron/Clegg made the responsibility of the local authorities then eviscerate their budget.
Then put into law that councils couldn't put their taxes up to compensate.
https://www.communitycare.co.uk/2016/07/13/cuts-reform-cameron-legacy-adult-social-care/
I mean, you are correct, but the manner of your correction makes it looks like you're looking for someone other than the conservatives to blame...
To be fair, I remember things being much better before conservatives got their grubby paws on our Health Service.
Yes, we've had a pandemic, but we had contingency plans for that. We were maintaining stock of required equipment... Until the conservatives decided to stop maintaining it and sold it off. We had 'nightingale hospitals' - conference venues converted to hospitals at great expense. However, 10 years of conservative policies meant we didn't have the staff to use them.
When British journalists asked Singapore leaders how they managed the pandemic better than most, the reply was (paraphrased) "Why are you asking us? We just copied your country's contingency plans"
We also have "urgent care" drop-in centres where we can see a doctor just by showing up. The waiting times however are less than optimal. A&E triage is still a thing, so if you if your appendix is about to burst, you will be sorted out fairly rapidly.
However when the capacity of A&E is reduced thanks to conservative policies (including policies resulting in a lack of staff), it means non life-threatening injuries are dealt with on a "when we can" basis. If someone has a badly broken leg that's not life threating, it means that once they are stabilised, they are not a priority. - but if they can't be moved because of a lack of beds in the hospital, they are stuck in the ambulance - which is then unavailable for the next call.
Conservatives would love a for-profit model of the health are system. It means they wouldn't have their taxes going towards the healthcare of other people. They don't seem to understand - that's how insurance works. We are already paying for it.
A badly run insurer/hospital would have the same problems.
The problem is that in the UK, we are already paying for one inadequate healthcare provider whether or not we pay for a second (or a wild west of providers). The solution is not to move providers, but fix the one we have.
In the states, I imagine there is a liability issue if your provider is unable to provide a service they are contracted for. With conservatives running the show, I feel we have more than passed that point.
Bring on an General Election.
"Not everyone is fucking woke, either."
So you think Sophie Wilson is a man?
Christmas is Christmas, and Hanukkah is Hanukkah.
They are both around the same time. You could stretch the dates to include other events, a 'season' if you will.
Happy Holidays is not about erasing Christmas, any more than its about erasing Hanukkah or Diwali, (Or Eid, but that moves about more)
Its about wishing good things upon everyone, not just the followers of one particular religion.
You can wish happy Christmas, or Diwali or whatever, but when you object to wishing folks from other religions well, that's Fucked Up.