Re: "breaks automated workflows"
"Monte Carlo simulation"
Maybe it'll work, maybe it won't.
Place your bets.
977 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Jun 2009
An entire city "catching strays"?
Yeah nah, we all saw the videos coming out of Amsterdam.
The reasoning seemed plausible.
There was enough evidence without the AI slop.
The dude got sacked for asking AI an "obvious" question and not actually checking the specifics. When pushed, he then was able to come up with different *real* evidence.
Yes, he should have been sacked. The decision about the game was still the correct one.
It's literally baked into many EULAs
"The Licensed Application is not designed or intended for use in hazardous environments requiring fail-safe performance, including, but not limited to, the operation of nuclear facilities, aircraft navigation or communication systems, air traffic control, or direct life support machines."
Admittedly it's more for transferring liability than actually stopping anyone.
Just to explicitly add.
BCC are having to fork out over £1 billion because they weren't woke *enough* 50 years ago.
Can't blame them for erring on the side of "less likely to cost them money" down the road.
Personally, hearing people complain about pronouns is like hearing people complain about seeing gays and black people on TV. We all know what side of history they are on.
It's worth remembering that most advanced microchips depends on machines originating from the Netherlands.
The nature of the world economy's interconnectedness means it is also a pain point for the US.
--
There in lies and interesting question. Can the rest of the world "persuade" the US to play nice. Or has it already gone down the North Korea/Fox news rabbit whole of "We have always been at war with East Asia"
The number of Americans on social media suddenly thinking it's their God given right to invade Greenland seemingly out of nowhere. They've been whipped up and aimed.
Just As sad to see as the UK "patriots" trying to burn down refugee accommodation.
What can we do about it? We've already got COVID lockdown denialist elsewhere on the thread. They are already among us. There are non so blind as those who will not see.
Or referring to the video footage coming out of Miniapolois, Vance more or less got up and said - "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command"
Are you getting some mirror universe news over there?
Sending in the marines for the "emergency" of falling crime?
Demanding the national guard be sent in to democrat strongholds because he doesn't like the peaceful protests?
Sends in his goons, and *makes sure* they are no longer peaceful.
That's before we talk about Jan 6th, Melissa Hortman, Kyle Rittenhouse or violence against trans people.
Admittedly, the left is not entirely innocent. However, the things that the left initiates (eg BLM) are a reaction to people either being murdered, or advocating for murder.
The most damming and depressing thing is that we're now having to keep score of the body count to see who the 'least bad' is.
The point being That people such as yourselves believing that the two are inevitably linked are stupid.
So off-the-wall detached from reality that the rest of us find it hard to take you seriously.
Which of course, you dismiss as far left propaganda and your people continue to die through your inaction, while racking up life destroying amounts of medical debt.
But hey, you saved those imaginary 100million right?
The same way "Hey compiler, write me some machine code because I'm not educated enough or too lazy to do it myself." does. How many remember the days of compiler bugs?
'Hey garbage collector, handle my memory management for me because I'm not educated enough or too lazy to do it myself"
Snobs sneering at interpreted languages as not "real" or "toy" languages?
It's turtles all the way down. AI is just another turtle, which has admittedly a long way to go before we trust it the way we trust a compiler. As for actually checking the output - that's literally part of our job. No less than checking what we ourselves wrote.
We are getting paid to solve problems, not show everyone how clever we are.
"what passed for chocolate in pre brexit UK."
Nce tasting chocolate? Or are you one of those who think chocolate has to taste bitter to count?
Compare Cadburys to Hersheys and I know which side I'd bet on all day. Even post Mondelez takeover.
Just don't mention the shrinkflation. The price of Freddos these days *mutters*
I can't program operating systems, but I can install Linux in (well) under an hour. Should I not do that?
I can't write a compiler, but I have GCC installed. Should I not do that?
I can't implement my own python interpreter, but have python installed. Should I not do that?
I can't implement my own encryption, but use SSH. Should I not do that?
Facetious, I'll admit - but even with the most control-freak interpretation of open source, there comes a point where you are trusting someone else's code.
I think the problem lies in that xkcd.
The big companies are betting the farm on (say) openSSL (either knowingly or unknowingly) and seem to think it's someone else's problem when there's a zero day.
Given such libraries levels of importance to the underpinning of modern society, you've thought there would be a commensurate amount of investment in the the care and maintenance.
Sadly, in many cases this is not true. Not only is it turtles all the way down, they're someone else's turtles.
There are already several devices that do what you describe.
The early versions are considered old hat because you couldn't "see through" them (think drone pov headsets)
As for being able to see around the screen:
Products by XREAL
Thinkreality by Lenovo
vIsor from immersed
Just the first few off the top of my head
Or...
Run proxmox on an Intel NUC based device
(I use an older NUC7PJYH )
Then you can run up as many VMS as you have ram/storage.
Cheaper than buying multiple pis and associated accessories.
OS choice becomes a non-issue.
Potentially fewer headaches when migrating to better hardware.
Need more CPU? Assign more cores or migrate to a beefier host.
Actual SSD speeds without extra accessories, no worrying about write cycles on your SD card
Backups can be just snapshots.
There are things pis are good for, but if you are using multiple in the same place, you are probably better off with one + a load of VMS.
That's my point.
When the rich are paying politicians to do you what *you* want. That's democracy in action.
Trying to have more checks and balances to keep such corruption in check? Lets stack the judiciary to remove the checks. Why, those checks are removing the power from duly elected officials! Muh FREEEDDUUUUMMM!!!
NRA, Big Pharma, Military industrial complex lobbying, the Church? Fine. Lobbying is part of politics -- Unions, BLM, LGBQT+ groups? Evil groomers, apparently
Elon Buying Twitter and turning it into a dumpster fire? That's capitalism Baby! -- Bill Gates spending billions on vaccinations? Evil! He must have an agenda!
Its the double standard that's funny.
--
In the UK we have conservatives complaining about Union donations to the Labour party. Without a scrap of self awareness.
*Their* donors are literally the people who "use their money to train a cohort of puppet politicians" - just look at the recent honours lists - or the Covid contracts. Where as the Union members are just regular voters who have to pool their funds to compete with the rich people. I am not naïve enough to think there won't be shenanigans when Labour are back in - but Unions are literally the people.
When finally, the UKs rich neo-cons manipulated the gov into producing the low-tax (and not quite yet) low-spend nirvana.... there were consequences. The people who *actually* own everything decided we were a bad investment. The resulting knock on effects wiped £300 Billion off the value of our stock and bond markets Source
Apparently, a cloud cukoo land policy meeting reality and failing to meet expectations must mean there is a conspiracy. I believe there is a warning about the dangers of capitalism in there somewhere
The WEF conspiracy theory angle always made me laugh.
You have people who genuinely believe the free market is king - but rich(er) people moving their money to do what *they* want rather than what *you* want is apparently unfair.
While *simultaneously* believing that the notion of world govs trying to *protect* the little guy from such moves is automatically evil - or worse, socialism.
Top laughs.
"ideal plans for loving, caring, mutually beneficial relationships"
That's what a lot of gay couples already have.
Trying to claim they "don't count" or "it's not real" because its not for you... then trying to rationalise it by referring to several thousand year old fairy tails.
How's that "not mixing of mixing of fabrics" coming along?
Basically trying to deny other people "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"
Spiteful
The difference between marriage being handed down by God, and it being a matter of Law, is largely a difference of record keeping.
Before said record keeping, many a young lady had been duped into thinking they were married, until the grooms *other* family was revealed a few villages over.
Still happens today, except we tend to have better records.
If you believe marriage is holy mumbo jumbo handed down by God, then its between the newlyweds (whatever their gender) and their maker, and none of *your* business (or the churches).
If you believe its 'not real' unless it happens in accordance with the church (whichever church) - then that *is* a matter of church law, by definition, and as such changeable under the mechanisms those churches provide. See also: the rules around divorce. Do second marriages count as marriages? The Pope "annulling" a marriage is somehow different?
Abusive spouse? Tough! Marriage is permanent in the eyes of god. (according to some sects)
Divorced after a year? Why not get married again? (according to other sects)
Make it make sense
When you have folks taking someone's umpteenth marriage (after umpteen divorces) more seriously than a gay couple who have been together most of their lives... It really makes it difficult to take certain religious types seriously.
History is littered with 'marriages' where the people involved were unable to give consent - or were only doing it for the legal status.
Children being married off?
Political marriages?
Green card marriages?
Shotgun weddings?
All of those taken more seriously than two consenting adults freely committing to spend the rest of their lives together.
Tell me you can at least see the disparity?
"At some point, you're arguing that businesses in this ruthless capitalist system we live in are deliberately forgoing profits and risking being out maneuvered by more inclusive competitors."
Yes, pretty much.
How many articles/comment threads have been full of stories of "Higher ups" not understanding the details of things they were making decisions on? How many "We told you so"s?
The competent little people often only get listened to if we're telling the boss something they want to hear. Look at Twitter...
Gender is an *extra* degree of separation away from those in the proverbial golf club.
"kids that are 7 to 8 years old"
So... an age where you *definitely* wouldn't let them go on the internet unsupervised, and who has the time to *properly* supervise? -- Or *properly* set up parental controls?
Well, us, but we are not the norm.
Instead people use walled-garden devices that are easier to lock down. oh look - Chromebooks and IPads. A mouse? is that like a separate trackpad? /s
For many of us, we nostalgically romanticise about our first taste of computing. BBC Basic, tape decks, doom/quake mods -- our whole careers and perhaps path of our lives were formed by playing with these systems as kids. When we hand our kids tablets to keep them entertained, it means Baby's-First-Operating-System is Android or IOS. Their first user interface is a touch screen. The first place they are likely to see technical information are in the settings pages of those devices. (What *is* your phone's IP address?)
As the current batch of kids grow up, they will have the same feelings of nostalgia about the current set of games and devices. We might be better off teaching them the underpinnings of what they are *actually* using, rather than sitting them in front of the 'Mom/Dad's Laptop' (that they rarely get to use) and trying to do it formally.
Want them to learn something else? 'Proper' Linux? Then give them *those* devices to play with. After all, that was literally the point of the Raspberry Pi.
How many of us come across grown adults who cant navigate a directory structure? People who are using a computer every day, but couldn't tell you where the Downloads folder actually is, or where to start looking for that document they just saved. You don't need a desktop operating system for that. That is something that can be taught to kids with phones/tablets - maybe a MicroSD card or two to introduce the concept of different drives.
Slightly off topic: I realise you were talking about *other people's* kids, but plug a mouse into that chrome book and set them loose on some (browser based?) games that take advantage... watch how fast their mouse skills improve. Quake 3 on the pi zero? Living room Lan party?
Related:
You start to run into similar issues with modern (but low specced) microcontrollers.
Not with variable names, but with strings.
If you declare a string literal to be written out over serial, (e.g. "Program got to here"™), the whole thing is written into ram before passing it on. When your dealing with 2k of RAM and no GC, a program that has lots of nice feedback soon fills up the available RAM. A trap for younger players, as it were.
The solution is to copy the string from flash/rom/progmem (which is usually in much greater supply). In the Arduino ecosystem, you have an F macro - so the above becomes:
serial.println(F("Program got to here"));