Re: 13 hours to copy a disk?
Well yes, but if it's 13 hours just to read the whole disk, how long is the rebuild time of a RAID set?
6049 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2009
No. Boris is outright lying. It is flatly wrong, a lie, and if he wasn't a politician the ASA would have given him a ferocious gumming.
It is 280 million (approx.)
We have a discount voucher (instant rebate).
Consider this:
I join a club where the membership fee is normally £3.50 per week.
I am special so I get a discount and pay £2.80 per week.
If I leave the club, I have saved £2.80 because that's the amount I actually pay.
I also can't use the members' bar anymore so my bar bill doubles...
There was both electronic and hand counting of the paper ballots. Any discrepancy large enough to make a difference would have been very obvious.
Any candidate could request that any block of votes be recounted by humans or machines, for any reason.
That mayoral vote was fine.
I quite liked Bojo as mayor. Little to no power, good entertainment, kept him out of real politics.
Adverts != Publicly posted content.
They're paid to show the adverts, and so must be legally liable for those in the same way a newspaper is.
And if they can't afford to vet all adverts they show then they can't afford to be in business.
It's a basic cost of being an advertising agency. Just ask Bell Pottinger.
It isn't a zero sum game.
The taxes pay for the infrastructure and environment - legal and physical - that makes it possible for my employer to do business.
Without that infrastructure and environment, the entire IT industry couldn't exist at all, let alone pay my wages.
It isn't.
A lot of people have made a huge amount of money from Bitcoin, Etherium etc.
Unfortunately even more people have lost a huge amount of money, because their value is defined entirely by how many USD someone is willing to pay for these tokens.
The emperor's clothes isn't a valid analogy. This is tulip mania.
An infrastructure package would have the same problem Cassini does, yet with far fewer instruments. Most of the mass is the bus.
There are so many moons that it has to spend a lot of fuel on station keeping. So it runs out in a scant few years, and then has to be crashed to avoid contaminating results from future missions.
Cassini itself was the infrastructure package for Huygens.
If there was a budget, we could have sent another probe before Cassini's demise to act as it's repeater - and then do More Science.
But there isn't. There's barely budget to keep listening.
Flat rate taxation is highly regressive - it costs the poor far more.
Thought experiment:
Tax is a flat 20%
A earns £10 a week and pays £2 tax. £8 to live on.
B earns £20 a week and pays £4 tax. £16 to live on.
£6 revenue. Cost of living is 9/week so A dies, now £4 revenue.
Change the boundaries and rates such that A pays 20p while B pays £5.80.
Now both can afford to live and to save for the future, so the state now has a stable £6 revenue.
VAT is a chain of businesses that pay it then reclaim it, until it finally hits a business or charity too small to reclaim it, or a consumer who isn't able to reclaim it.
With my business hat on, I only ever really pay the ex-VAT price to a VAT-registered supplier. The only cost to my business is the time the finance people take to deal with the paperwork - which is far lower than the VAT I'd othwrwise pay.
A consultant who is VAT registered is actually cheaper than one who isn't, assuming they both pocket the same total profit from the job.
Banking services are the act of collecting money then disbursing it.
Consumers do the latter a lot more than the former, businesses tend to be more even.
If the latter is hard to do, people leave the bank and go somewhere else, taking all the money with them.
If more than maybe 20% do so, the bank goes bust.
For all people took the mickey, the dancing monkey was right.
Windows only exists because it's easy to develop for. Anyone can write anything and it's trivially easy to then sell or give it away to anyone they want.
Linux is also easy to develop for, but it's a bit harder to sell or give away the result as the distros vary. Not too nuch though.
Web "apps" are the elephant in the room of course.
On the fourth hand, Apple are slowly killing macOS anyway. Unless there is a big change it'll be gone in 5-10 years and Apple won't care - they don't make much money directly from it. The final nail will be when they officially let you develop for iOS on something else.
Remember that the billions lost aren't a "total" as such.
Eg I go to site X to buy a £10 widget, give up, try site Y, give up and finally buy it from site Z which has a UI I understood/could find said widget.
Site X lost a £10 sale and Site Y lost a £10 sale, so a £20 "loss" but I still spent my tenner and got my widget.
The studies were done in the 80s.
Faux-3D where clickable things look like they stick out of the screen and repond to a click by appearing to become depressed was the consensus opinion for "best UX" throughiut the 90s and 00s.
Several different studies have shown "flat" to be less discoverable and slower to navigate.
It's just that the design people have forgotten history. No doubt this will be "rediscovered" soon.
In the UK we don't use flap valve toilets because they're rubbish and often leak.
We use siphon flushes, these are inherently leak proof as there is no valve at all between the cistern and the bowl.
My loos are at least twenty years old and have never leaked. One of them might be older than me, it's hard to be sure.
I've replaced one filler valve, and one flush lever arm after it rusted through. That's it.
Except that none of those use smart meters.
The smart meter dewign spec has the following features.
100A contactor for remote disconnection.
Radio system for remote reading and configuration.
Radio system for remote real-time display.
To me, that looks like a way to shed load, or to draw a cock'n'balls visible from the ISS.
Successive Government hand-wringing, dilly-dallying and time wasting increased the price, but it's still the cheapest way to get that amount of non-fossil-fuel energy.
If we want electric cars to be something other than rich people's playthings, then we need a D, E, F, G and possibly H as well.
Transport uses more energy than you think.
I've never seen any of them on the first page of comparison results.
Get your annual totals and plug them into a meerkat, Welsh opera singer, dancing skeleton etc.
Use your real annuals, the standing charge/unit cost variation is very important.
I change supplier every year, and every time I get around 10-15% refunded due to overcharging.
Seems that all the energy companies do the "oh, turns out you do use less than average energy, sorry we charged you too much for six months" - despite providing the annual total use for the previous year and regular meter readings.
I don't think I'm that relatively efficient, everyone uses LED lighting these days.
I can and have asked my credit card company to refund me after the shop I bought a thing from refused to make good.
In accordance with the Consumer Credit Act, the credit card company refunded me with very little hassle.
They may or may not have gone after the original seller, but I was quite happy to leave them to decide on that.
Farage can't think that far ahead.
I think he wanted fame. Don't think it was power as he ignored what he had.
Farage was the UK fisheries rep to the EU - and couldn't even be arsed to turn up. If you think the UK fishermen got a poor deal, it was primarily because of Farage.
There's down (3%) and very down (11%)
But in the other hand, stagnant wages and high inflation caused by a 15-20% drop in the value of a currency will obviously cause a large reduction in elective spending.
I'm surprised that the UK market isn't worse.
Although there might be a buying spree before Brexit itself actually happens, especially given our current abject failure to actually do any negotiations or even to set out what our Government wants. Still shocked that Mrs May threw away the first six months and yet still has no position.
Nestlé were claiming that their baby milk was better and safer than breast milk, despite knowing that almost nobody in that market had access to water clean enough to use it safely.
They even dressed up their salespeople in fake nurse uniforms for a while.
This wasn't ignorance. They knew it would result in thousands of deaths and they just didn't care - their bottom line was more important. Their response to the initial outcry was - and even in 2013 remained - "Someone else should improve the water supply".
Over in the USA and EU, they'd lost a lot of sales to "breast is best", and were desperate to increase sales at any cost.
It's similar to what Martin Shkreli did more recently, except on a grander scale.
If nothing gives you the style of UI or the features you want, you choose the cheapest or the fastest and live with the limitations until something cones along that does.
Firefox is neither of those - Edge/Safari are preinstalled on Windows/Mac (cheapest), and I believe Chrome is currently the fastest.
Mozilla asked the extension/addon developers to comment on the WebExtension API.
They did, each describing the features fundamentally required to port their extension over to the new technology.
Mozilla closed them all as WONTFIX.
When 57 releases, there are going to be a lot of very surprised and very angry users, who will rapidly become ex-users.
If you simply copy your competitor, then you lose.
Why should I use Firefox when I can get Chrome for the same price - since Australis, they now look almost identical and Chrome is faster.
Firefox' USP was the customisation. I could install many extensions/addons that customised the way it looked and worked.
Not just colours and textures, but layout and some UI behaviour.
Yes, that all came at a cost but the cost was shared between Mozilla and the extension authors.
Take that away, and what is left to recommend Firefox over Chrome, Edge, Opera or Safari?
If they all look and behave the same, then I should pick the cheapest or the fastest. Firefox isn't either of those.
The problem is that the new WebExtensions API intentionally lacks most of the features required for tha majority of popular Firefox plugins to work.
Mozilla were asked to add these missing APIs before they made the switch, but instead of doing that they said "No, we have no intention of ever implementing these things".
It is a shame, but it seems very likely that this hubris is about to kill Mozilla.
If you switch to ESR 52 after 54, then your profile is incompatible and won't work.
It should theoretically be possible to export your profile then import it, but...
Essentially it seems that Mozilla have decided that it's too much hassle to continue existence and would like to quietly die.
Not true.
The Crown owns all the land below the high-water mark, so it's only possible for anyone else to own the land above that.
There are quite a lot of private "upper beaches" in the UK.
The main difference is really the "public rights of way". There are very few UK beaches that don't have long-established public rights of way down to the high water mark.
The vast majority of those are older than the USA, and the Ramblers Assoc. fought a long legal battle a few decades aho to keep them.
Same with other couriers, it's not exclusive to them.
There are countless anecdotes of parcels taking unreasonable and in some cases completely insane routes according to the courier tracker and calendar days taken to arrive.
Of course, there's no way to know where a package actually went - only what the courier admits to.
Depends on your definition.
"A tax levied only to maintain the public roads" then yes, it was abolished along with National Insurance, income tax and all the other taxes initially created for some specific purpose.
"A tax on vehicles using the public road network" then no, it still exists along with National Insurance, income tax, etc.