* Posts by DavidP

2 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Jun 2009

I need to multitask, but Windows 8's Metro won't let me

DavidP
Headmaster

Another "Real World"

Well - this whole thread seems to consider only what you all call "Multi-tasking" in an office (Perhaps Software-development) environment.

To me, Multi-tasking involves a real-time set of software processes controlling some sort of industrial process.

(Say, loading a ship with liquid gas ?)

Each hardware process carries on simultaneously, and continuously, (in real time) whilst the software processes monitoring or controlling it run intermittently, controlled by a scheduler module.

Real time computers are ALL Analogue computers.

The CPU Multi-tasks (Now called Multi-Threading, I think), running each software process in sequence.

This sequence varies, as the needs of the Industrial processes dictate.

Multi-tasking occurs (seen simplistically) at two levels:

1/ The CPU runs multiple tasks cyclically.

and

2/ The operator views various "Windows" on the screen, each of which may be updated either continuously, or intermittently. He "Multi-tasks" between windows, viewing display changes.

He also may be called on to use judgement and change the changes imposed by the software processes.

A MS Windows PC lacks an in-built task scheduler which is able to be used adequately by the Systems Developer. Ergo - Windows cannot properly be made to Multi-Task in a way which permits any one program (process) to promote itself in the Task Table.......

Well, I'm rattlin' on too long.

If you want to make Windows Multi-Task, you have to first write a Task Scheduler module, I thought.

Or am I out of date ?

DataSlide reinvents hard drive

DavidP

Electro-Mechanical

I accept that it only moves microns, but surely, ever since Analogue computers,

we have known that electro-mechanical devices are inherently more prone to

failure than solid state ?

Why is this device better than solid state memory / memory sticks ?

Has it a longer re-write life, and why ?

And can't we now do core memory in flatpack construction ?

David