Re: Chilton also called out how pristine the capsule looked
Should have just left it in the hangar.
15450 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
Those that don't depend on cloud services are doing okay and can carve out a niche, those that do are just having their work ripped off by the cloud services oligopoly. How did the cloud services oligopoly get where they are today? By open source.
The business model did pay off, it doesn't now. As a start up, your established competition has made billions innovating using open source as a base to start with and has reached that point where it doesn't need to innovate any more. Perhaps the internal culture won't even allow innovation any more, maybe it will only allow money to be invested in things it 'knows' will be successful.
Those megacorps which are already there have billions to invest in staying on top of the pile. They do that by copying and pasting open source and buying up promising apps or services by start-ups and shutting them down.
Google has announced they may bail from cloud services in a couple of years if they're not successful (this 'burning platform' announcement may even help that happen). If they can't do it, nobody can.
I look forward to it turning into the Bonzi Buddy of password managers.
How are you comparing "this kind of crap" to "for free"? (Answer: with JavaScript, probably wrongly, maybe.)
The answer is 2) because Google are desperate for your fine-grained location and this person is good at coming up with bullshit excuses:
Want to use an app which scans for WiFi APs or Bluetooth devices? "Oh, we need you to activate location because the app could harvest MACs and talk to its mothership to work out where you are (even though it may not have the Internet permission)" -> You turn location on to allow device scanning in the app to work -> Google gets your location.
What to use a dark mode app? "Oh, we need you to activate location because when we tell the app to go to or leave dark mode, the app could use that sunrise/sunset time as a way of working out where you are." -> You turn location on to allow dark mode in the app to work -> Google gets your location.
Spammers don't seem that clever themselves:
This is what happens when you reply to spam email | James Veitch
Perhaps you could cite a better report? The one I cited is still cited today in the Wikipedia article (36).
I didn't downvote but I don't know what a Cockaigne is.
It seems 20% of homeless comes from California state and 10% from the rest of the US, making 70% homegrown. Doesn't seem too unreasonable to me for a city like SF.
Does Oracle, you know, pay its taxes?
No, no it doesn't.
Google shifted $23B in overseas cash to Bermuda tax haven in 2017, report says
For years, tech giants Google, Apple Inc., Microsoft Corp., Cisco Systems Inc. and Oracle Corp. have used what’s known as the “Double Irish with a Dutch Sandwich” to reduce their global tax bill by funneling all foreign revenue into an Irish subsidiary, who sends it to a Dutch subsidiary, and back to a third Irish subsidiary with a mailbox in Bermuda, which has no corporate income tax.
So, why are they getting precious about poo and wee and homeless people on their doorstep? It's a result of their tax avoidance, it's what they wanted to happen. Perhaps their clever accountants could connect the dots next time and pay the taxes so the city can set up homeless shelters.
Your entire argument is based on a fallacy, you have absolutely no data on which to base lives being saved by Teslas running on "autopilot". The badly-named cruise control feature only takes over when the driver is not driving and requires driver attention at all times as it only achieves level 2 driving.
In a dangerous situation the cruise control will:
a) notice and deal with the situation
b) notice and realise it can't deal with the situation, disengaging warning the driver to take over who does that - the Tesla didn't save lives.
c) not notice but the driver will and takes over - the Telsa didn't save lives.
d) not notice but the driver won't be ready causing accident or death
e) not notice and the driver won't notice either causing accident or death
The only possible way a Telsa can save lives is a) and even then there is no proof that the Telsa dealt with the situation better than the driver could do without assistance. b), c), and d/e) are progressively more dangerous than human drivers.
Finally you've started talking about "safety features". No, let's bring it back to over-sold level 2 cruise control. That's what we're talking about here.
This is my limited understanding of the problem space:
Presumably you say that because there's no other way need to learn about how people get killed on roads and there's no existing data to draw from. The sacrifice will be worth it, after all were it not for the pedestrian getting killed on a road but not on a pedestrian crossing, Uber would have never have learnt that not recognising people off pedestrian crossings could get them killed. Were it not for people's Telsa's driving straight down a dividing motorway or under trucks, Telsa would never have known that these things are possible.
So here's to live crash-test dummies. So modern. So disruptive. So beta. So fucking absolutely brain-dead stupid in that tool-like arrogant way that only present-day Silicon Valley tech is.
Now that it's been proven in La La Land that calling someone a "pedo guy" + repeating the claim more specifically without evidence + sending a private detective after someone is not defamation, perhaps El Reg could use Elon "Pedo Guy" Musk for as name in all stories featuring him from now on*. After all, it's a quote from Elon himself and it's only 1/3 of the way that Elon went. What can the thin-skinned billionaire narcissist possibly object to?
* Which will be about one of 1) his rocket measuring contest with Bezos, 2) his magic battery-powered AI deathtraps getting people killed, 3) his latest ill-advised Twitter tirade/podcast interview.
I have no idea why people should be obliged to buy new phones. The government finally obliges banks to offer basic bank accounts and banks come up with yet another way of locking people out. Any mobile website + authenticator app will do the job for a non-card reader solution on a mobile phone. Well yes, I do have an idea, the marketing possibilities are fewer.
3) Original objective achieved
The Department of Homeland Security has withdrawn a proposal asking for everyone - including US citizens - to pass through facial recognition cameras as they travel in and out of the country.
Bet they're still going to scan resident foreigners though.
Then on the other side of the new and shiny FinTech coin N26 had security holes you could drive a bus through a couple of years back, mostly to do with the server trusting the client too much and having a non-rate limited API which was too chatty. Hopefully their standards have improved since then.
If the other countries in the EU change the rules to suit us whenever we want then they surely must make up a sensible, democratic, efficient, and technocratic organisation and they are good.
Otherwise if they don't change the rules to suit us whenever we want then they are crazy, antidemocratic, burocratic, inefficient, and, er, technocratic and they are therefore evil.
Got it.