
Re: Yes but....,
Passive Voice (consider revising)
16866 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
I think there are more suggestions than complaints because there's infinitely more chance of getting it fixed at Dabbsy's end than at the cloudy end.
Odds are that it was something they already had and they wrote the requirements to fit the software rather than the software to fit the requirements.
Of course it's normal - how many shiny piles of shit from Accenture, Crapita, etc... have HM Govt paid for?
Shouldn't Apple (bootcamp) or Parallels supply the appropriate keyboard layouts?
If Parallels finally do it in Parallels 20 then they will give it a shiny feature name and spend 6 months spamming you about it so I'm rather hoping it's Apple, but I doubt it's very high on Apple's OS development team's priority list, they've been held hostage by Marketing who've decided they need a major OS release every year so we actually have the pleasure of upgrading yet again.
You need to hand-roll your own Windows keyboard layout to match the Mac's keyboard and install it. Use the Mac's virtual keyboard menu thingy to see all the dead key combinations and put same keys into the Windows keyboard layout.
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=22339
Of course you need .Net 2.0 which if you install in the wrong order with the other .Nets has a funny turn. Oh, and as it was released when Vista was around it might not work with Windows 7 or 8. Who said IT was pointlessly complicated?
The PFYs who did the web makeover thought it would be far easier to manually insert "Print/" after the site in the URL than it would be to click on a button, e.g...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/Print/2015/02/19/feature_25_years_of_adobe_photoshop/
I'd like to meet that genius and shake him by the neck.
Presumably if the same firmware image is replicated across a batch of 200,000 routers and another OS image is replicated across 150,000 routers, if all routers in each batch have the same public key, then all routers in each batch could also have the same private key.
If this is so then you need to concentrate your efforts on one router from each batch and you will get keys which are good for 350,000 routers.
I think he abdicated his responsibilities as a UI designer with Yosamite. It looks like crap and expand window/full screen was better the way it was in Mavericks.
And on the software side it looks like they've allowed it to become a little more sluggish, relying on SSD to pick up the slack.
And don't get me started on their recent fascination with glue guns and unexpandable RAM. Even Jobs didn't put up with that nonsense.
Sucks to be someone who specialises in baking bread, they don't exactly have the salary to spend it on buying in services but it's nice to be at the top of the heap and buy lots of different kinds of bread.
Unfortunately the poorest are generally the least specialised, so they can't buy everything, or they may do a specalised job which isn't very well rewarded (like baking bread). They may have no other resort other than to bake bread themselves so they can make it till the end of the month.
In an economic downturn people often can't get a specalised job, because it's not on offer. They may have to make do with a lower paid non-specalised job, so they will want to cut back on buying-in specalised services too.
Try and tell these people that they should specalise when they're unable to and buy as many services in as they can when they simply don't have the money.
It doesn't matter if I fix my computer or bake my bread in my own spare time whether I'm good at it or not, it's my own spare time. The only problem is when it isn't my own spare time and I'm forced to fix computers at work (bad use of resources - I'm a programmer) or bake bread to survive (but by that point society has probably collapsed anyway).
So is Tim saying that the economy is worse off because I didn't go down to the pub or to the cinema and spend money in my own spare time? Or the economy is worse off because we should all be obliged to buy bread? If it's the first one it's forced consumerism which is not a free market economy, if it's the second one then that's false too because the market has provided the basic ingredients for people who want to bake their own bread so there is profit in it somewhere.
... The priority is to get the platform right."
That´s what they said with Windows Phone 7 -> Windows Phone 8... Have we actually got any further in the past two years apart from re-arranging the notification centre while the platform sinks?
I would hope this is a local account and not a Hotmail/Live/Passport/Outlook/whatever it's called today account so it would just be the same as fingerprint readers for the Windows 7 login screen only following this standard.
If it's for a MS account that's all kinds of scary.
"The idea was that into the first ship, the 'A' ship, would go all the brilliant leaders, the scientists, the great artists, you know, all the achievers; and into the third, or 'C' ship, would go all the people who did the actual work, who made things and did things, and then into the `B' ship - that's us - would go everyone else, the middlemen you see."
AOSP is updated by Google every Android release and Google says what goes in it. If Google for some reason doesn't want the bug fixed then it's not fixed in AOSP (e.g. IMAP IDLE or ad-hoc wifi support) and everyone has to do their own fixes in their own distros. Often these fixes never happen.
Cyanogen has stopped working on CM11 Milestone 13 so they can start working on getting their Lollipop version out the door and when AOSP is updated mobile manufacturers have to customise it before it goes into their mobiles which takes 3-6 more months. This wait wouldn't happen if AOSP were really developed in the open.
If Android were truely extensible then most of their work could be done by allowing drivers to be added with the minimum of fuss and letting phone customisations and operator customisations be installable as apps (if you uninstall them or they become incompatible with later versions of Android then they would drop back to stock Android).
There is also the elephant in the room which is Play Services which is sucking more and more things out of AOSP and making them proprietry, letting the AOSP versions rot. It's got to the point where there needs to be an open source equivalent of PS.
Delete? Do you honestly think it's really deleted? What are the chances it's a flag not to appear listed on the voice search page?
"after you delete information from our services, we may not immediately delete residual copies from our active servers and may not remove information from our backup systems."
https://www.google.com/intl/en/policies/privacy/
They should have the data to back it up, it's just sat on three different servers...
- Advert server pushes out advert.
- Analytics picks up viewers pressing the stop button at the time the advert goes out plus a couple of seconds.
- Microphone picks up surprised voices and swear words shortly after that.
They wanted to provide all streaming services by Audio Factory but they say it's too costly to run mp3 and AAC streams at the same time and some devices can't do AAC.
So they've kept some mp3 streams with some Shoutcast servers for those devices.
They also didn't publicise the Audio Factory links so everybody used the Shoutcast links.
Result - Shoutcast servers overloaded and many streams appear missing to many devices.
Bit of a mess.