Re: And that ain't all
Well, Nadella did fire the Trustworthy Computing team in a round of layoffs and their work was moved into other areas of the business. Windows Update has never been the same since.
16887 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
There was a story only last week about a Reg reader who was a Talk Talk customer and had money taken from his account around the date that Talk Talk said they were willing to entertain goodwill payments, only for the payment to be about 30 quid.
And if you don't believe him then maybe you'll believe Jeremy Clarkson who published his bank account number saying it wasn't enough information for people to take money out of his account, only to find it was.
That's a big generalised statement you're making, but you seem to have less to back it up than the people who have quoted passages from the DPA and Supply of Goods and Services Act.
They're not letting them leave, ignoring their statutory rights, and not giving meaningful conpensation when people do have money taken from their account.
Unfortunately few people know their rights and won't cancel the direct debit, won't quote them their rights, and won't tell them if they want the money they can take them to court.
Next up will be a card to ID yourself before being able to browse.
Obviously these people will never be happy untill they've got all the cattle tagged. Meanwhile we have to listen to nonsense like bulk access to internet comms is not the same as mass surveillance.
No Google account, don't use Chrome, I use another search engine unless I have to, and a dynamic IP.
Also the HTTPS question doesn't take account of client-based encryption and PFS.
The mail answer doesn't take into account a MITM fiddling with strings to stop STARTTLS from working.
The password answer talks about data in transit but doesn't say that data at rest can be stored without encryption (Talk Talk).
Probably others. Someone else will comment.
And the obligatory question - when is El Reg going to switch to HTTPS?
It'd only be more blindingly obvious if they said they were opening it in Cheltenham. Amazon would be obliged to decrypt everything they've got the keys for if asked to.
Don't these things also automatically replicate data to other regions in case they fall over? Perhaps after popular demand they'll need to put a tickbox on the control panel saying don't replicate to the UK.
I'm not sure if the local calendar server as a way of allowing more 3rd party calendar software to work is innotive or an admission of Android's inherent cludginess. Hopefully everything's faithfully replicated upstream to the Exchange server, because if does something like screw up repeated entries then that could be annoying/embarrassing.
I very rarely have trouble with Ars' reviews, they tend to stick to the facts and argue why they believe a feature is or isn't any good. One of the first things he says is he's only had two days with it (like, it seems, everyone else) and a full review will come soon, which seems entirely reasonable.
Maybe VW does have to cough up the source code in a criminal investigation but perhaps govt testing agencies will have trouble asking for it as part of their testing regime before allowing sales in the country.
And after the VW scandal that's absolutely what they should be bringing in.
No Party shall require the transfer of, or access to, source code of software owned by a person of another Party, as a condition for the import, distribution, sale, or use of such software.
It depends what a Party is but I think that's entirely reasonable for power stations, vehicles, or governments. Does this mean that can't happen any more?
Well, that and they could give you an electric shock if it was feeling particularly French because the metal surround was actually a pin as well.
Also your SCART with RGB DVD player probably didn't talk to your telly in RGB because you plugged it into the SCART with S-Video plug or you bought a cheap 10-pin cable, instead you got a composite picture. Same for stereo and Dolby sound.
About the only thing it did was standardise the connector, but it didn't do that right because as mentioned there was some stange repellent magnetic force between socket and plug.
And we're about to go through all that again with USB-C, the SCART of USB connectors (see news of the Google engineer reviewing USB-C cables on Amazon). Apart from the falling out bit as we will find out when people trip over the cable and it's not at all like magsafe.
All they need to do is serve up a picture, how many stars it's got, a bit of text info, and a view button. Add a search option. Just the kind of thing a common API could do, and it all gets presented by the telly or box or stick in a standard way.
Sad to say the latest Apple TV is the one which has come closest to this. Bloody Apple. Again. Not really innovating, just doing the obvious thing while everyone else spent years not doing it.
Sad to say that nobody in all these gigantic megacorps has thought of just starting up Kodi and copying it.
Actually I'm not sure why I'm that surprised, iOS, Android, and Windows Phone/Mobile/whatever it is now should have feature matched every feature from older OSes like Symbian and Blackberry 7 but still haven't managed to.
You've just let TT set the agenda. The slack security (three times over the last year no less) shows they've not taken the DPA and Supply of Goods and Services Act seriously and are not competent enough to provide the service.
That aside, TT trying to charge a leaving fee after going on record as saying they wouldn't if money was taken from bank accounts on or after the 21st of October allows you to argue they're acting in bad faith.
And the Supply of Goods or Services Act says that the service must be carried out with reasonable care and skill and the service must be of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose.
Everything that Talk Talk agreeded to do in the T&Cs and haven't done can and should be used against them, but that's not the end of the story. I have no idea why so many people quote the T&Cs as if they were gospel when they are not, your consumer rights always win over a load of one-sided lawyerese with a couple of paragraphs thrown in so they can claim it's not all one sided.
... what with advertising networks and apps connecting everywhere.
"It's a very serious error on the part of Google and we are thinking about making an official complaint"
No, try properly translating your text and proofreading it before publishing instead of just copying and pasting it. It seems it was from Galician to Spanish so it shouldn't be that costly.
And http://www.ukec.co.uk/ which is the website for UK ENUM Consortium Limited, the organisation in charge of the enum project for the UK, just reveals a template website.
I fear enough hoops have been jumped through so it looks good from abroad yet it's been set up just to stop people actually using it.
Customers wanting to leave the popped telco will need to have had money stolen on or after 21 October as a result of the hack, and have contacted the fraud department.
They've not followed the DPA or the Supply of Goods or Services Act, but statutory rights aside, they've even broken their own T&Cs.