Not under my roof you won't
the ecosystem of smart locks, thermostats, lights, doorbells, cameras and so on all starting to work with one another
That's a clusterfuck waiting to happen, but in somebody else's house, not mine.
15445 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
Yet there was an O2/T-Mobile agreement, there was national roaming between Orange and T-Mobile, and there is an EE/3 agreement.
I don't think there's any particular law that stops active network sharing, it's just it requires a bit of organisation between the two companies.
I can only assume the hero image for this article is the Reg commentardiat's reaction on seeing a new DevOps article.
What with their inability to work if they can't phone home, the manufacturer's inability to support network services, the data slurping, and 3rd parties getting bored and pulling apps (e.g. Skype) which may make expensive additional hardware worthless (e.g. Skype), the smart money is on a dumb TV with a cheap Chinese Android stick.
This is one of two things.
a) We are looking into the sausage factory and seeing how the sausage is made and it isn't very nice. One day the sausage will be delivered and everything will be fine.
Or
b) Windows 10 Mobile users will be subjected to Agile hell for the duration of ownership of the device, nothing ever really completed and as soon as a new app is thought up then effort will go into that instead of finishing off everything else.
Cloudy stuff is generally b) and they've said that cloud is first, so they're adopting a methodology suitable for cloud products.
You'd have to launch it as a proper console with all that entails. As it is, I'm not sure of the need for this either given that a Nintendo DS with an emulator will do the job.
IIRC there was some talk of something something called a Vega after the QL to rescue Sinclair Research but he ran out of time and had to sell to Amstrad.
They are not addressing backdoors because it's bad PR and it's what China and Russia do. Instead looking at France and the UK, laws are made which threaten heavy fines and jail sentences so that end-to-end encryption or devices with encryption that is too difficult to break are designed-out at the design stage.
Rename a file in Terminal and Finder will faithfully treat it differently if the extension changed. That also goes for if you told Finder to show file extensions then rename a file with Finder changing the extension.
Here the malware seems to be an app bundle dressed up as an rtf file, and if you have extensions hidden (as they are by default) then you're not going to know unless you realise the context menu options and properties are appropriate for apps.
Not good design.
The nobbled version of Transmission puts an executable in the Library directory in the user's home directory. That process could encrypt any document the user has read/write access to, it just depends if it's programmed so that it searches other volumes too. Assume the worst.
You'd need to panic if you see kernel_service in activity monitor or in the ~/Library directory (~/Library is now helpfully hidden by default, Choose Go from the Finder menu to find it).
But I'm not sure how the PARIS mission suddenly goes off onto a tangent into videogames for the last question though.
Maybe if you're lucky one of the other chapters goes into detail about how to apply for permission from officialdom. Or maybe that requires a whole textbook...
They can't immediately delete all the source code and object code an send the engineers onto other projects as soon as this is finished because, if this works and sets precedent, they'd get another All Writs Act for just this other iPhone. Then another. And so on.
They would also need to testify in court about how the firmware was written, giving more leads to everyone else about how to do it.
Eventually Apple would argue it's too burdensome and they'd get a demand for govtOS instead, arguing TSA luggage keys as precedent or something. And I'm sure the TSA would want a copy of that too, along with the police, FBI, and so on.
Yes, he might be understandably annoyed by that... Redmond heavies take an open platform (in the sense that anyone could release anything for it) and then add new features which are available only to UWP and he has to use their crappy store and pay the Danegeld to be able to release UWP games.
Yet because UWP is badly designed he also has to fight bugs and changes caused by MS tinkering with it in an effort to try and fix it, meaning higher costs after release.
All that for 30%. What's not to like?
Meanwhile San Bernardino goes one step further and says there's an encrypted virus on the iPhone which could attack the city unless they get the PIN off Apple, or something. The kind of idea that was thought up by writers for CSI Cyber then dropped for being too stupid.
San Bernardino DA says seized iPhone may hold “dormant cyber pathogen”
Even the most sympathetic judge is going to have trouble with that one.
Like the mice's chocolate biscuit factory.
(Accenture tells The Home Office and HM Customs that the e-borders project makes passport control out of breadcrumbs and butterbeans. Accenture run the e-borders project, and it does appear to work, but then they rope off the passport control machines before anyone can go through.)
http://www.smallfilms.co.uk/bagpuss/stories.htm