Time to mention Consent-o-Matic again
Automatically rejects many cookie banners for you. Click here and scroll to the end of the page.
16887 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
"This is probably the most annoying thing that’s happened to me as a result of being wildly reckless with LLM agent" but "I'll probably try to fix the problem by booting from an Ubuntu live disk then letting my AI agent have a go at fixing its earlier error".
Can't wait for part 2, if he ever posts back.
And the nation plans to start its youth early on building AI skills in preparation for the future workforce.
"Today, our children are born digital natives. But we must still give them more deliberate exposure to AI," asserted Wong.
A nation of prompt engineers?
and it will only work if doing things in FreeBSD comes as easy as in Windows to the masses
They don't need to know other deposits, they just need to know if someone's income level is above or below £X to check if the means tested benefit applies. Then maybe once the DWP have managed that they could work on pro-rating the benefit according to income level.
This works because any income in other bank accounts will be declared properly. If someone is defrauding then that's another story and the DWP already have access to bank accounts for that... but fraud will be cash-in-hand.
It's absurd that the DWP can't check people's income from HMRC.
Joining these all up means unavoidable, intrusive and all-pervasive state monitoring of everything.
It is also absurd that having two government departments monitoring bank accounts is deemed better privacy-wise than one government department just ascertaining last year's income level from another government department. That is precisely the alll-pervasive state monitoring you're afraid of due to different government departments not being able to make reasonable queries to each other.
I don't care if the DWP put a checkbox to look up only the relevant data from HMRC on the application form or allow people to attach the relevant paper documentation, either option is fine and I suspect it would be for most people. But the fact that the DWP have developed means tested benefits apparently without a way for them verify income is absurd.
This by the way is why the WFP will only be available for people who are on other benefits now. If they had an easy way to verify income there would be no cut-off at a level which causes hardship for people.
Precisely, there's no need to look around people's bank accounts except for fraud. All the DWP needs to do is determine if the last year's income is over £X by comparing with the last year's PAYE figures or self-assessment. If they did that then there would also have been no Winter Fuel Allowance cliff-edge problem either.
We seem to have systems which are really showing their age where one part of government can't query another and to fix that they've gone for full bank account access.
Starlink could have provided a list of all drone serial numbers or MAC addresses and their locations within Ukraine and Russia to Ukraine and give Ukraine the power to enable or disable them at will over two years ago.
It hasn't because Musk didn't want to then and still doesn't want to now even while Russian drones attack Ukraine using Starlink hardware. If there were any justice in the world he should have already lost a court case for sanctions busting.
Why does everyone have to work at FAANG? It's only going to be a culty/techbro/toxic hellhole (delete as appropriate according to company) and they're probably going to leave after a year. There are lots of other companies which require comp sci grads too.
I know some of the senior technical folk who work (or worked) at Mozilla from their participations at IETF and they always seemed very privacy focused to me.
And yet they still don't get that adding new opt-out settings in a release for the user to find sometime later is not informed consent and they still don't get there's other things apart from advertising.
I understand they need money but they still haven't done the one thing that could make them that money which is Firefox making it easy to allow micropayments for online content and Mozilla gets a small commission (not 30%) for each micropayment and obviously no wallet loading or crypto nonsense. I.e. the user goes to a blog or a video, hits a button, confirms the amount or enters the amount to tip, and gets access. Perhaps some kind of integration with Kofi and Patreon. If we want to get away from advertising-driven data slurp, that's what we've got to do.
They can't pick and choose who is and isn't a customer.
They're not a customer, they're a leech. Some corporation making commercial use of open source software and keeping that as profit or distributing it to shareholders but not contributing money back to the original project has to be addressed somehow, perhaps the FUTO licence is a good first step.
Nobody has to distribute online immediately at their own expense even though that's often done now. I'm sure Wordpress will also gladly supply DVDs if sent a cheque to cover the cost of the DVDs and self-addressed envelope with stamps to cover postage.
Although as it's WP Engine they'll probably forget to include the cheque and the stamps to pay for postage.
Telegram is not encrypted in any meaningful sense. If you buy a new device and log onto Telegram then you get all your channels, groups, and 1-1 chat history back on the new device. If Telegram has all the data and is served with a warrant, it's got to hand over all the data. This is not a back door.
The only thing you don't get back on a new device is E2E encrypted chats which is buried in the UI and requires one of the parties in the group or 1-1 chat to say something like, "Can we switch over to E2E encrypted chats" which is an obvious red flag and will make the police or courts serve a warrant for one or both devices if they have been identified.
The reason why Telegram has become a den of vice and iniquity is not due to encryption which its users probably aren't using anyway, it's due to its policy of ignoring requests from police or courts. France has forced them to join the real world, at least for a short time.
One month to do a full regression test, one month to fix everything found, and one month to QA and release is pretty tight, and that's if the VPN/AV developer drops everything to concentrate on the Mac release. I suspect they make a fraction of the money from Mac as they do on Windows they wouldn't be too inclined to do that.
If you set up a team for a new project, all chat to do with that project has to be done within a channel within that team instead of random ad-hoc 1-1 and group chats between members as that way there is a record other people on the project can find and people who come onto the project later can review. This is the right way to do things.
Teams makes them difficult to use, team chats are in a different place and also behave differently when you reply. It's not the user doing it wrong, it's the software.
A monster set of packages like e.g. KDE or LibreOffice are enormous code bases as well as all the artwork that goes with them. To get sufficiently familiar you basically have to work on it full time.
So how is one supposed to contribute to it?
Concentrate on just one area, perhaps something that hasn't received any attention recently, and keep working on it until it's "done".
Whether Israel is reorganising for assault or defence time will tell, but the rhetoric suggests attack. That's an escalation in a volatile region and it's getting messier.
The playbook is to disable communications before launching an attack, so expect that shortly.
Paying Microsoft for Office 365 is genuinely a cheaper & less stressful way to consume Exchange.