Re: so far it's taken an hour and it's still searching
Well so far the computer's been going 24 hours and it's still searching, and that's with the hotfix that's supposed to speed it up applied. Fucking useless.
15423 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
@h4rm0ny: Running a thorough fuzz test on a server using the SMB1 protocol should have found this, it is after all a problem caused by a subtraction operation run on a 16-bit value and a 32-bit value. They've had a few years to do it. Same goes for a thorough code review. SMB is a known weak point for viruses.
Speaking of Redmond's incompetence, I manually started Windows update on the other half's laptop this morning and so far it's taken an hour and it's still searching. I'm not surprised this is spreading like wildfire since MS nobbled Windows 7's Windows Update when they released Windows 10.
People aren't going to wait for this update to deign to download and install automatically, they're going to turn the computer on, do something, and turn it off again. This is why the March patch has not been installed yet for home users.
Telefonica R&D... Oxymoron overload.
Where I work has some corporate updater that seems to be designed to keeping updates off the computer and only updates IE once every six months or so. Then people work from home and get a load of updates coming in because IT haven't worked out how to stop them when the computer is off the corporate LAN so you're safer if you work from home. If this doesn't get us it'll be pure luck more than anything else.
Symbian Belle also did hamburger menus, but at least Nokia understood that the menu bar goes at the bottom, the hamburger icon goes in the bottom right, and the menu itself popped up at the bottom right of the screen.
It's as if nobody thinks about UIs any more, they just unthinkingly regurgitate bad designs.
I think they've factored in the cost of a certain percentage of people stopping using it, because they know most will put up with ads for Disney films appearing in replies.
Will you be able to switch jobs as easily? Do employers have to prove they've exhausted all host and EU candidates before hiring you? Will you be able to set up a business as easily as an EU citizen? you aren't working, will you still be able to get healthcare and unemployment benefit? Are you sure that the UK part of your pension will rise with inflation? When you retire, who will pay for your healthcare for that part of your working life which you weren't resident in your host country? If you worked in mote than one EU country, will the rest pay your pension? Etc... etc...
I'm glad you're so confident about these things. Perhaps other people in the same situation are just getting bothered about nothing...
Take a look at the difference is between your EU treaty rights now and how foreign residents from outside the EU are treated wherever you are. You wouldn't have the same status where you're resident and you wouldn't have the same freedom to cross over EU borders (on holiday, on temporary work assignment, as a frontier worker, or moving to another EU country).
Why would the tax be distributed differently but remain the same? I can't see any of the EU 27 willing to subsidize the UK.
Even if the UK doesn't charge tariffs on imports from the EU, there still has to be an element of cooperation. The UK has to show where goods exported to the EU came from so they can be checked and the right tariffs can be charged on the EU side, otherwise the EU will just charge the highest tariff it can and/or seize goods.
Indeed. My point was that British expats may be required to pay tax on foreign income like American expats are, given that the present government is so keen to throw them under a bus with regards to Brexit (their proposal to the EU was just convert the status of all EU citizens in the UK and British citizens in the EU to ordinary foreign residents and say 'job done, let's talk about trade').
If they prohibit cross-domain JavaScript the whole jquery angular Web 2.0 bollocks would disappear up its own fundament overnight given that web designers are seemingly incapable of copying files across to their own domain and instead find it preferable to include them from elsewhere meaning they are at the mercy of third-parties deleting a left pad function or something.
And advertising and tracking would get killed overnight.
On second thoughts perhaps they should do it.
This is crap (what Google are doing, not the article).
Google care more about the potential lost ad revenue from (malware) apps running on outdated versions of Android than backporting a dialog with allow/deny buttons the first time overpaint is used or whatever it is they're going to do in Android O.
The fix would eventually arrive on many phones, more phones than Android O will.
- Right, brainstorming guys. What can we do before the money runs out?
- I once went on a weekend break to $CITY and saw $THING on a bus. Let's copy it.
- Ok, anything else?
- I once went on a weekend break to $CITY and saw $THING on a bus. Let's copy it.
Ok, anything else?
- I once went on a weekend break to $CITY and saw $THING on a bus. Let's copy it.
Etc... etc...
And how would a string type fix the fact the programmer used a substring compare function instead of a full string compare function?
In many languages, that bug is simply impossible.
There are languages without substring compare? Tell me which ones they are so I can avoid them.
It's purely bad coding, not C's fault that someone decided to use strncmp instead of strcmp. Looking at the code snippet we can be fairly sure that he two strings have already been validated and stored in their own string buffers, so why not use it? You'd get the same error in BASIC if you'd decided to use LEFT$ instead of = for some crazy reason.
And code review and QA should catch it. The fact that it didn't means AMT is probably full of other bugs.
Travel history during the past fifteen years, including source of funding for travel.
Address history during the past fifteen years.
Employment history during the past fifteen years.
Well I could get about 3/4 of that right. Maybe. The question is, can I be arsed to jump through all the hoops? No, I can't.
I wonder what the US tourist industry has to say about this.
If you're developer in the UK making something that can be considered a telecoms app or service, you need to avoid e2e encryption and build in realtime monitoring otherwise, if you are told to give up data on someone, you won't be able to respond in 24 hours with the data they ask for and therefore you will have broken the law.
They even tell you to consider this law when designing your app or service.
But no, there's no "we ban e2e encryption" clause. Why would there need to be if you end up in a whole heap of trouble anyway?
He doesn't need to argue, Skype etc... already are covered:
A telecommunication service is defined at Clause 223(13) as ‘a system that exists for the purpose of facilitating the transmission of communications by any means involving the use of electrical or electromagnetic energy’.
"14. To consider the obligations and requirements imposed by any technical capability notice when designing or developing new telecommunications services or telecommunication systems."
That there looks like banning e2e encryption and building in realtime monitoring.
If I understand it correctly, any developer who offers an encrypted app or service and is served a notice has 24 hours to decrypt the data they have on someone and hand it over or they are breaking the law.
This is does not allow for e2e encryption. Despite MPs saying it wasn't banned, it was banned.
Has their braindead legislation just made hashed and salted passwords illegal?
Maybe the future for apps is a plugin architecture and open source e2e plugins on github, similar to PGP encrypting email messages despite SMTP knowing nothing about how that's done.
So is the article insinuating that a bottle of red a day is real safe limit and the puritans have forced it down ever since?
Some of us have to work in the morning and think with our heads and that, we're not all journos you know.
The MS spokesman will say something like, "You see, there's a very good reason why we've done this. It's very technical and veeery complicated. It needs Edge because cloud. Only Edge can offer the cloud as it was meant to be experienced."
Looking forward to the registry hack landing about the day after.
Can the IBMers survive on a remote pacific island using only their initiative and key performance indicators? Using some old AS/400s for heat and the staff canteen for food, watch as they try to make it to the end of the month to receive their wages. Their stay could be cut short at any time by an e-mail from HR telling them to relocate to an office 1000 miles away or pack their bags.
I upvoted, but then I immediately realised that the OBR is, after all, a government department so would face pressure to not be as generous with other parties as it would be with the government. But I'm unsure as to how it could be done in a different way.
Then there are also the actual manifesto promises themselves - are they politically feasible or is it just made-up shit? The Electoral Commission, for instance, should have had the power to block the referendum until there was a credible contingency plan from the government and a credible exit plan from Leave.