Re: How about unicode?
Flight plans are in capital letters only according to this.
So it can't be choking over a character which is not capital, or numeric, or one of a few symbols since this is so simple to validate.
15436 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
Flight plans are in capital letters only according to this.
So it can't be choking over a character which is not capital, or numeric, or one of a few symbols since this is so simple to validate.
Got it.
That said the same principle holds. As ICAO codes have been a thing for years I find it difficult to believe that, in the Year of our Lord 2023, flight plans loaded by NATS are subject to the vagaries of encoding converters in the airport name in preference to the international code and one mashed up utf-8 or iso-8859-1 string or e.g. someone calling an airport by the town where it is ("Le Touquet Paris-Plage") instead of its real name is enough to bring the whole house of cards tumbling down.
It would mean that NATS would fail much more often.
The move came after a little bit of misguided shaming from Bill Gates, who mistook communication cables for power cables. Nonetheless, attention from the billionnaire techie was enough to drive the cables underground.
Telegraph poles are also a thing in the UK and US, maybe he should also drop a few hints in his home country and on visits to the UK.
Gaming and home computing did not collapse in a slump in Europe in 1984. The Atari VCS alone did though, probably because it was crimping out games like ET then burying them in a hole in the ground.
The only lead the VCS would have had this side of the pond would have between 1978-81. But still, I can't remember anyone I knew having one from 82 onwards. With game prices like these, nobody would want one. I can imagine them being sold on to the unwary to part-fund a home computer.
So it was launched in the UK in 1978 for £169.95 or £200 depending on where you look in this thread. Either price is quite pricey for 1978. It apparently sold 125,000 units in 1980.
Then the ZX80, 81, and Spectrum were released.
Then if you click here, search for "Numbers of units sold by Atari in 1984" for European sales figures, it's become a rounding error all over Europe compared to home computers.
Breezy Weather (link) seems to be a reasonable substitute.
You need to add the repo to FDroid, instructions here.
Block means they can't reply to your threads and you don't see their posts, mute means they can reply to your threads but you don't see the posts.
The difference is RWNJs still get to stomp all over your threads and insult you if they want and your followers get to see that even though you don't.
Now Thurrot is reporting that the EU thinks that Microsoft's concessions to the CMA go against the EU's own agreement with MS which required MS to licence to competing cloud services.
Perhaps MS let the cat out of the bag with their response to the CMA and their promise of "competing cloud services" to the EU always meant just Ubisoft, only they didn't tell the EU that.
Technically at their best, since their following 3D games were progressively more meh whereas 3D games made by others were better.
But their most playable games were those similar to their arcade roots. And they probably knew it since went back to arcade games in the NES/SNES era.
Apps are directories with files inside which follow a structure. They may be in user space or they may be in /Applications.
If the app folder is dragged to /Applications without an installer as most are, the owner is still the user (failure 1) and some of the files inside may be changed because Gatekeeper doesn't check everything on every run.
Also, apps create their files in ~/Library. The structure more defined than AppData in Windows but apps can still create files with almost any name they want (failure 2). Apple have been trying to retrofit jails for each app but a lot of stuff belonging to other apps can still be messed around with.
If that's all you want out of an LLM, then it seems like you don't need an LLM, just a search function.
A search function doesn't stitch together answers from various sources. Hopefully we will get to the stage where LLMs will be able to do that with three caveats: 1) not making stuff up, 2) citing the different sources which it used to make its answer, and 3) citing authoritative opinions on the answer where necessary.
Your proposed LLM is easy to program at least, get some venture capital and go for it.
Why should ChatGPT have an opinion? An encyclopedia regurgitator would be the best thing it could be.
Maybe it could find out that some notable people have said that this Shakespeare play is the best for these reasons and other notable people have said that another play is the best for those reasons, but ChatGPT shouldn't be giving its own opinion. All that would happen is humans would copy-paste that opinion and pass it off as their own and the Internet would fill up with something ChatGPT said for unknown reasons as the definitive answer.
Likewise for health, economic policy, foreign policy, etc... We really don't want LLMs to have an opinion and that should be the kind of thing enshrined in law.
Great, we've waxed lyrical about the 70s and 80s again, as always happens when this subject is brought up.
Nowadays schools push chromebooks so they have to be online to do homework. And how do you police them when they're on the Internet doing their homework, by not giving them a mobile and watching sitting next to them while they use the chromebook which oddly enough are designed to be always online all the time but are oddly remiss when it comes to parental controls for school-administered devices?
And even if you did do that (which is not a good thing to do when they're teenagers because if you do that to them at that age then they know you're implicitly saying you don't trust them), how would that stop Google, Facebook, et al targeting them for advertising? Every website builds up an advertising profile on everyone. Yes, commentards here all run a Pi-hole but that's not a universal solution.
And then they'll go to a friend's house or use a friend's phone and do everything they want anyway.
So, social media sites need to pull their weight instead of turning teenagers into the next credulous MAGA generation.
About the only thing I've been successful at is stressing that if it's on the Internet it's probably bullshit and you need to take whatever it is with a truck-full of salt, I think (I hope) the message has got through.
Louis Rossmann has the same theory. Can't say I disagree.
t.co links have been around probably as long as Twitter, only Musk used his galaxy brain to stick a sleep(5) in there if the address the t.co link lead to was NYT, Threads, etc...
You just decide not to use it and go to a (hopefully FOSS) alternative.
For existing projects it's more of a pain but if contributors have no problems keeping an open GitHub account then there's nothing stopping them from opening another account elsewhere, the T&Cs can't be worse.
The only way you're getting free money out of an offline cash machine is if the power fortuitously gets cut before it can talk to the mothership again and maybe not even then.
Perhaps the only way the bank was remiss is not making "this is not free money" message more blindingly obvious than it already was when the customer puts their card in, by displaying it in flashing red Comic Sans 36 point or something.
The runner up is someone selling fake books written using ChatGPT on Amazon and Amazon which uses ML to police suppliers, online reviews, and customer service failing yet again at all three.
The winner is the school district asking ChatGPT to tell them exactly which books out of all the ones they have contain references to sex, ChatGPT confidently making shit up (again), and children's education being restricted as a result.
Enshittification has escaped from the Internet into the real world.
The £25m NHS data transfer deal to Palantir and recent leaks from the Electoral Commission, PSNI, this, and others means essential UK population data won't be lost. Putting data out to tender on the internet so organisations can make copies represents best value for money for the British taxpayer.
An editor which only understood plain 7-bit ASCII would mess up iso-8859 and utf-8 text and puctuate readable text with nonsense every so often where there is an escape sequence. Also you couldn't grep it.
You need a command which properly interprets escape sequences and removes them, like piping through ansi2txt would.
All this aside, do you really want to train more British children in using shitty software from a long-term monopolist?
So you're saying moving from training kids to use shitty software from a long-term monopolist to training them to use shitty cloud services from another long-term monopolist is an improvement?
I'm another one who started using vim on the Amiga and since then PC, Mac, and Linux. I don't think there is a piece of software which has been used by more people over such a long period of time which is testament to the quality of the software and the person behind it.
And so another bit of Minority Report came to pass.
Communications were sent to both all staff and Teams with the instruction not to use WhatsApp for sharing personal data. NHS Lanarkshire subsequently seized the phones of staff involved which was completed by ███. All phones were deprovisioned, which NHS Lanarkshire confirmed deleted the chat, and staff have been issued with new phones.
First of all, I bet many staff members had the unencrypted Google drive backup option enabled.
Secondly, it appears WhatsApp is not good enough for the NHS but it's good enough for the government. Shouldn't the ICO have instructed that MPs and civil service phones with WhatsApp be requisitioned, a copy of the chats be taken to get them officially recorded, and WhatsApp and data be deleted from the phone by now?
So why bother giving them money from government then? And why bother setting a minimum legal investment? Just let them sink as companies until someone buys it out and runs it effectively at a rational price.
They already tried that in the US and it didn't work.
I think there was a film about codejunky's posts made in 1973.
Perhaps something as vital as rail infrastructure should be run by the government, that way train companies wouldn't need to receive bailouts from the government, make only the minimum legal investment, and sell tickets at a higher price all just to make a profit to distribute to shareholders.
(Idem water.)
By the way, the London ULEZ requirements are Euro 3 (2000) for motorbikes, Euro 4 (2005) for petrol cars and Euro 6 (2014) for diesel cars. Judging by the response to press coverage over ULEZ, it seems most people will be surprised to learn they do have a vehicle which meets those standards after all.
All of these problems are probably down to those .DS_Store files which just don't work very well on network drives or even if there is more than one user locally and more than two decades later Apple still haven't seen fit to replace them with something less terrible.
About the previous post:
it is negative advocacy, and promotes anti-platform sentiment
Don't we all get to the point in IT where we hate all platforms equally? Apart from retro ones of course.