Re: Next step...
It still makes me chuckle that mischievous individuals had corrupted that AI into a hard right culture warrior within a day of it going live!
439 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jun 2009
I don’t know about the US, but in the UK, if you crash into the back of the car in front of you it’s your fault, not the fault of the driver in front. There could be any number of reasons he performed an emergency braking manoeuvre, it’s your responsibility to leave a large enough gap in front that you have enough time to react and stop before hitting the car in front.
That all these drivers failed to do that shows that humans really aren’t very good at driving safely. It should also be noted that the Tesla didn’t hit anything, the only ones causing accidents here are the human drivers.
While I’m sure the Tesla self-driving mode has plenty of shortcomings, (MKBHD did a great video of recording his drive to work with his Tesla in full autonomous mode), I think this incident says more about other drivers than the Tesla.
I can’t say I’ll be switching to a Linux desktop any time soon, but I’ve been very impressed with the Linux desktop mode on Valve’s Steamdeck. Aside from the fiddliness of an on-screen keyboard the OS has loads of great features, supports all the compressions types I’ve thrown at it (Windows still can’t do anything other than zip files) and Flatpak makes installing stuff a breeze. Not to mention pretty much every Windows app I’ve thrown at it has run, no matter how old.
You seem to think Ring cameras are constantly recording- they aren't. They're motion activated and you can specify the distance from the camera at which motion triggers them. Even then, I've found they're only good at spotting movement about 3-4 metres away.
You say your other neighbour opposite is 4 metres away, which seems unlikely. I know we have some narrow streets with terraced housing in the UK but even then when you factor in pavements and a road it seems unlikely to be just 4 metres.
Finally, the picture quality of the doorbell is only any good up close. If you think it can see in through windows and resolve details (even if they're allegedly 4 metres away), you're sorely mistaken.
Still, I'm sure this won't stop you from being the self-appointed Pedo Finder General for your street...
Burying nuclear waste underground is a perfectly safe means of disposal. Where do you think radioactive materials come from in the first place? There’s pockets of radioactive material all over the globe that are mined for reactor fuel. Or is Mother Nature working for the Pro Nuclear Lobby now too?
This is the other side of the coin on the right-to-repair. iPhones are basically worthless to steal as they get remotely locked and are essentially a brick that broadcasts their location to authorities. That said, until fairly recently they could still be dismantled for valuable parts but now that Apple marry most of the expensive components, they’re not really worth stealing either. So while it makes repairing a phone much more expensive, it does make them less nickable (until someone works out how to break the activation lock!)
It feels like we’ve come full circle from when Intel’s Pentium 4 ended up running too hot. IIRC one solution they were looking at back then was for micro channels throughout the CPU for liquid to pass through so it could be more efficiently cooled.
I never heard about it again, so either that was when Intel dumped the Pentium 4 and went back to the Pentium 3 architecture or they never got it to work right.
Honestly, I like the walled garden. I can recommend iPads and iPhones to non-technical relatives and not worry about them installing things they shouldn't or doing something to break them. The worst issue I've had to solve was someone turning on the rotation lock.
I'd spend hours on the phone trying to fix their Windows machines, since recommending Apple kit I rarely have to deal with any problems.
While I do see the advantages of breaching the walled garden, it's not enough for me to want to deal with all the headaches. They'll be installing things willy-nilly from the inevitable Facebook App Store and wonder why the battery life is terrible because Facebook have the microphones running all day.
I admit it’s been ages since I’ve used notepad.exe, but does it still put everything on one line when the linebreaks don’t come with a carriage return?
I basically stopped using notepad about 22 years ago when the code for my university final year project got so big it exceeded the maximum file size notepad supported. Downloading Editplus over a 33k modem as a replacement wasn’t fun.
While I’m sure restricting users to getting their repairs from Apple certified outfits was the main goal, this does have the benefit of making iPhones worthless to thieves. In the past the Find My lock was a good deterrent but phones could still be sold for parts. Now they’re not even worth it for parts if they won’t work properly when transplanted into another device.
Every device from the 6S onwards is compatible with iOS 14. If you're still using an iPhone 5S it came out in 2013 and the iPhone 6 was 2014. You can ditch Apple if you like but you'll likely find Android devices get even shorter support times (I'm still bitter Google dumped support for their Nexus 6 after just two years).
It seems Epic got greedy trying to abolish payments altogether and ended up only slightly better than before. I know Apple aren’t popular around these parts and the 30% charge is excessive, but I do think they should receive some sort of recompense considering they host the app, distribute the updates, provide the APIs, development tools, etc. They are a business and not a charity after all.
It will be interesting to see how Apple handle this. I’m sure they will try various tricks to discourage people using external payment platforms, like being extra picky about approving apps, maybe making changes to the T&Cs so that only reputable payment platforms can be used, etc. I’m sure they’ll be looking for ways to skirt this judgement.
The judge in this case was very impressive, she really seemed to know her stuff and wasn’t in the least bit afraid of calling these mega-corps out on any bovine excrement they would throw out.
If ARM is that important to national security then the government should be buying it. Whenever a UK company gets bought all that ever seems to happen is the IP gets retained and all the jobs go elsewhere. I know ARM is currently still based in the UK, but how long is that really going to last, under Nvidia or Softbank?
I've seen it suggested that Epic didn't expect Google to boot them off the Play Store which is why the lawsuit and pre-meditated media campaign were all targeted only at Apple. Of course it could just be it's because Apple is where they make most of their money (apparently a significant percentage of Fortnite players are on iOS) and aren't too bothered about what happens on Android.
I was also surprised to see Microsoft file some sort of notice that they support Epic's case when they also charge 30% for digital games on the Xbox store. That seems like something that could come back to bite them in the future...
That's a good idea although I recently had a situation where users were receiving emails from a system I maintain and I could find no evidence that my system had sent it. After looking at the mail headers and finding the sending IP I discovered there was a duplicate of the live VM running right down to the same hostname! It was merrily pulling in data and sending out order updates all on an old copy of its database.
I don't know who spun that server up or why, but you should always beware that some dodgy sysadmin hasn't cloned your test server from the live one and you're actually on the wrong server! ;)
Actually, no I don’t. I’m quite shocked the author thinks web developers wants a rendering engine monoculture. I rarely bother to test all the browsers these days because compatibility and standards compliance is very good, unlike the bad old days where I’d need to test every f***ing version of IE and write custom CSS hacks for it.
I don’t want to go back to the bad old days of zero web innovation or progress, MS ditching Edge can only be a bad thing.
I’m not surprised everyone has stopped caring. The first year most retailers were caught by surprise and had to actually discount stuff to get in on the game and the next year was somewhat similar, so there were some real bargains on offer.
Now though, the shops seem to have got wise to consumers expecting bargains this time of year and are making sure they get in plenty of tat they can flog cheaply on the day (well week) rather than losing money on stuff people would actually want. Consumers have noticed and aren’t all that bovvered about the day any more.
I'm surprised the boss wasn't rushing into mission control to beg the BOFH to help sort out the mess he's made of their GDPR preparations. I'd imagine taking a fire axe to the marketing email server and blocking Mailchimp would prevent most of the organisation's drones from breaching the rules.
Lots of games these days are “open world” which means the system is constantly streaming new chunks of the landscape from disk.
I would imagine those sorts of games would be affected by this, as a general example they try to predict where the player will go next and often stream in the next area they think the player will visit. If the player then turns around the game has to hurriedly dump what it has loaded and stream in the data for the other direction.
Thank you, you have very eloquently conveyed exactly my concerns that people may not be able to re-train for a new type of job when their old one is automated. Sure new school leavers may be qualified to supervise and manage the machines and therefore balance the employment figures but the old workers won't just vanish into thin air, they will be the ones left on the scrap heap.
While it's not an exact comparison, I think a good real world example is the closure of various British heavy industries in the '80s. Most of the workers in those industries were unskilled and when the coal mine/steel mill/factory closed there weren't any new jobs in the area that they were qualified for and they weren't able to re-train for anything else. I could see automation doing exactly the same thing.
@LegalAlien The UK imports far more from the EU than it exports to it (and those exports have been dropping for over a decade now as the EU contracts). The UK constitutes between 0.5% and 1% of each EU country's economy, so if the EU decides to put up trading blocks they will only be harming themselves when we reciprocate.
The UK economy contracted by about 2.5% during the 2008 banking crisis, so how bad will it be on the continent if every economy contracts by 0.5% overnight? If the EU is mad enough to block trade with the UK they would only be harming themselves in the process.
One more thought: If the EU really is so vindictive and malign towards countries leaving, then surely we are better off getting out from being controlled by them?
If your server still accepts SSLv2 connections and you've used the same private key to generate your SSLv2 and TLSv1.2 certificates then you are vulnerable.
If for example it's an Apache web server and it's configured to accept SSLv2 HTTPS connections then a hacker could theoretically use the weaknesses in SSLv2 to reverse engineer the private key being used. Once they have that, they can decrypt all TLS traffic as it's using the same private key.
In practice, this means bombarding the server with SSLv2 connections to work out the private key and then the hacker needs to be able to capture any TLS traffic to your server so that they can decrypt it. That's a lot easier said than done.
The simple solution is just to disable SSLv2 support on your server (unless you know you need it). This seems to be a fairly complex and difficult to achieve hack (unless you're GCHQ) so it's not the end of the world if you haven't yet disabled SSLv2 but I would definitely recommend reviewing what versions of SSL/TLS you currently allow and disable any that aren't needed.
I used to jailbreak but there's just no point any more. iOS does everything I need with only emulators being missing from the App Store... and I can get those now by just building them in Xcode (Provenance is especially easy). There's really no need to jailbreak these days other than to prove you can...
Yes, this is more my take on it as well. Employing people as contractors has become an easy way for companies to easily avoid any of the responsibilities of an employer and to be able to get rid of people without having to give any notice or pay redundancy.
I'm currently working as a contractor for a company who have a hiring freeze on, I would prefer to be an employee but there's just no chance of that.
I see where you're coming from, but I think the problem with UAC is that while it does prevent nasties being able to run silently it doesn't fix the fact that once that app has been given permission to run it can do anything it wants to the system.
The registry for example is basically a one-stop-shop for everything on the system and has no concept of restricting apps access to their own area. The entire registry is there for the taking. Likewise there's no jailing an app to its own directory or preventing it overwriting files or programs in other areas of the disk.
UAC is less of a security feature and more of a button to absolve MS of any responsibility if the program you're running messes your system.
While it would break compatibility with loads of applications I think MS should look at moving away from the registry and start jailing apps to their own install directory. Sure there will be plenty of times where apps will need access to external resources but I think that could work a bit like Android/iOS where you can decide what features an app can access like the camera or contacts.
I'm sorry but I used WinPho devices back then and they were sluggish, fiddly shite. Tiny buttons and overcomplicated screens that required a stylus to poke, a browser that might have run Flash but barely reached IE6 levels of compatibility and apps that just stayed open in the background using up all the RAM until you waded through several Control Panel screens to manually kill things.
WinPho might have ticked a lot of feature boxes back then but they were all so badly done that it was a rubbish device to use. Plus the Athena was gigantic, it was hardly something that could be slid into a pocket like most phones or the iPhone. Oh and the iPhone 2G was made of aluminium too.
I do applaud MS for building Windows CE, it managed to cram all the essential elements and APIs of the Windows desktop into a portable device which was an impressive feat. The only problem with that though was they failed to recognise that on a mobile device you need a simple and fast interface that doesn't require getting out a stylus or poking fiddly little buttons. For all its flaws the first iPhone's multi-touch interface made it a pleasure to use on the go.
I believe Intel's concern about overclocking was over unscrupulous PC makers buying cheap CPUs, overclocking them and then selling them as higher specced models. This would not only hurt Intel's bottom line but could also annoy customers who have paid extra for a chip that Intel wouldn't replace if it failed due to overclocking.
That said, that was their argument about 15 years ago when there were still smaller companies building desktop computers. These days most people want laptops and the few desktops made all tend to come from Dell/HP/Lenovo. It's only the enthusiasts who really still build the big gaming rigs so I guess that's why Intel are relaxing things a bit. That said, they were doing Extreme Edition unlocked chips about 12 years ago so I think overclocking goes in and out of fashion at Intel.
Considering OSX ships by default with a block to prevent execution of anything not downloaded from the App Store I'm not sure how much of a problem this would be. Tricking people into downloading an app off the web would be pointless because OSX would simply not run it. It wouldn't even prompt for an admin password like Windows, it just behaves like you never even clicked on the app.
Of course that does leave room for nefarious apps being allowed onto the App Store by Apple but that would require the developer to pay for a developer account, pass Apple's certification tests (which could well catch an app giving itself admin privileges) and then you'd need people to actually want to download the app.
Unless Apple promote the app on the App Store homepage it would probably sit in some corner of the App Store being ignored like 90% of the other apps on there... Bit of a storm in a teacup methinks...