To quote MST3K...
"Would somebody please tell the director about compressing time through editing?"
122 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2009
A love triangle? They didn't want number 2 to be faceless and soulless? They're going to develop the "characters", and leave the short-story format for more of a soap-opera style, aren't they! Golly.
I do hope they develop that love triangle; it promises to be a lot more interesting than that boring "wanting to escape" part. And I'm so looking forward to seeing the human side of number 2, explore his human and sympathetic side, maybe even have some dramatic moments that explore their sameness and differences in more heart-rending depth. They don't have to wallow in that boring "prisoner trying to escape" thing; they can explore the various dramatic and interesting relationships with the characters around him!
I can see it now: he refuses to fully commit to a relationship, because he believes he is going to escape one day, resulting in dramatic tension. Oh golly! They could have long, heated conversations about it! One of them could become slightly upset, and leave you wondering if they're going to break up, only to reconcile the next week! Wow!
This promises to be as good as the new Doctor. I'm weeping tears of joy. Really.
A lot of the reactions I see on news sites are in this style: "This is a smear campaign posing as political satire."
Which, interestingly, sounds like a Glenn Beck tactic.
Maybe it is more correctly described as a "meta-smear campaign posing as political satire of a smear campaign posing as political satire"? Or something like that.
Beer icon, because I have the flu, and haven't had a pint for a week. :(
No, no, people, you're doing this all wrong. Your responses should be along the lines of:
"Oh my, he's EVEN BETTER? I can hardly WAIT for the new series to come out on DVD, pay $75 plus shipping, wait through the non-skippable extended-length advertisements, and enjoy an entire season of an unremarkable soap opera with special effects!"
I thought I was a fan of the doctor, until I bought "seasons one and two". I guess I was wrong.
My goodness, what an astounding video! They have made a device that, without human intervention, TURNS BY ITSELF. (Yes, I am being sarcastic BTW.)
I wonder what function the oscilloscope provides, that is so vitally essential to this turning action that it has to be mounted on the turning portion of the contraption.
This would be much more convincing if it were shot on blurry VHS video.
How disappointing. For a second there, I thought they were using the money to research something, you know, something that wouldn't get funding otherwise. Pure optimism, I know.
So, on the bright side, I'm still capable of optimism. And here I thought US politics had burned out that part of my soul, scattered the ashes over a landfill, and built condos over that.
"The big problem is that anarchism (and it's close cousin, American libertarianism and its unbridled free market) is impossible in practice due to human nature."
Exactly. But that doesn't make the libertarian end goal of "anarchy" pointless. A 100% efficient engine is not a poor goal just because it is impossible. The engineer works towards maximum efficiency, knowing that it simply isn't going to happen. In the same way, a good conservative works towards zero government interference, knowing that his representative will be selling out his ideals to the highest bidder, and then redefine "conservative" to mean something completely different. Ugh.
So the point is that as an /ideal/, anarchy does not equate to blowing up buildings for fun, any more than capitalism equates to secret police organizations orchestrating the blowing up of buildings to give the government additional mind share when starting a war. As an ideal, anarchy is good; it is the is the ultimate "100% efficiency" goal of conservatism, even though we know it is really impossible (because people are such amazing asshats).
Of course, to many people anarchy means "destroy the government with no plan for what happens after". This is clearly not a good thing. I'm pretty sure Curious George would not approve, although he might do it by accident without meaning to, and end up soaking wet and shivering outside in the cold, somehow learning a valuable lesson about why you should read about the issues before you go to the polls to vote.
(Jolly Roger, reminding you that you can't break the rules if there aren't any.)
Wow, this guy's a serious brand whore. BMW, Tiffany, Rolex, Glock... he just has to have the name brand versions! Maybe if he was a little more thrifty, he could have stolen less money, maintained a lower profile, maybe stayed out of jail for a longer. Or indefinitely. Makes me want to start a life of crime just to show people how it's done.
[*] Well, actually a Glock 27 is a pretty good value, and it doesn't really pay to cheap out on firearms...but to point that out would totally ruin the flow.
(Paris, because I said "brand whoring". Heh heh.)
"Tech workers cost money; how can we increase competition so they'll be cheaper? Hey, if women weren't put off by the horror of a tech career, that would nearly double the number of qualified applicants for any position! How can we (quickly and relatively cheaply) sell women on the idea that a tech career is fun and rewarding?"
*sigh* Why aren't they trying to discourage men, that's what I want to know!