Re: Have they tried
BRST.
I still use it to mean a hard re-IPL.
Rig Red Switch Time.
-A.
2316 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2009
... at some of the proposed usage patterns here.
To: is for the primary recipients. You probably expect some action from them and/or a response.
CC: is for secondary recipients. You don't necessarily expect any action from them or a response but consider that the message is useful information to them, especially if they are directly mentioned. This is a courtesy, as is the fact that the principal recipients can see that they also got it.
BCC: is for, I dunno, snitching on your colleagues? Sharing confidential information with persons who shouldn't get it? Some other random nefariousness? Seems pretty shitty to me.
If you are just sending out a bulk mailing and don't want to leak PII then you need a program intended for that, not a personal email client.
-A.
'"For example, a developer writing code using MongoDB will be able to ask Duet AI for Developers, 'Filter customer orders over $50 in the past 30 days by geography, and then calculate total revenue by location,' and Duet AI for Developers will then use information from MongoDB's products to suggest code to complete the task, so developers can build even faster," Google veep Gabe Monroy explained. '
Well that's fine and dandy.
Should a developer buy in to the "suggestion" then code analysis and validation should follow.
What's actually likely to happen is "a computer said so, so it must be right" and blind acceptance. Go ahead punk, are you feeling lucky?
-A.
I seem to remember once upon a tie-bold that Microsoft thought it would be clever if Internet Exploiter were to spider all the links on the page you currently had loaded in order to assess their trustworthiness.
They had to abandon the idea because it worked pretty effectively as advertising click fraud.
Maybe old habits die hard.
-A.
Anyone with less than 4GB RAM installed had no compelling reason to go 64-bit and one very good one (executable image size) not to.
In fact if Microsoft had not hobbled PAE support I would say that most users still have no compelling reason to go 64-bit.
-A.
> color laser printers cost a lot more
Do they? I guess no one told Samsung when I bought one of theirs (a CLP 310) for eighty euros brand new retail. OK, it was a few years ago, but that was about the going for a non-disposable inkjet.
Speaking of which, the only time I ever bought an HP printer it was dead on arrival. Unfortunately "arrival" was about a hundred miles from the point of purchase, so it never made it back. The round trip would have cost much the same as the replacement cost locally.
The local replacement I chose was a Lexmark S300. That did actually work, but left unused for any time and the jets block so hard that it requires 2 or three deep cleans to get working again. Which just so happen to use up all the remaining ink. I have an ecotank model lined up to supplant it.
-A.
Pascal had the notion of file, but no way to bind it to the actual filesystem of the actual machine the program was running on. (C got round this by simply insisting that all implementations emulate Unix.)
Borland got round this by a non-standard, but essentially compatible mechanism using a special comment syntax. You could (often) compile the code on another system, but of course the non-standard stuff didn't then get executed at all which wasn't especially useful.
Well, I used TP on an Amstrad PC1512 to create my coding assignments and then Kermited them into the educational establishment's Unix box. That dates me.
The genius of Borland's pricing/shareware model was evident when in my first coding job we had to migrate a program from Pick to DOS and elected to use Turbo C due to familiarity. They must have picked up a lot of future customers while they were students.
-A.
Yes. It's like the search for extra-terrestrial intelligence. It's almost certainly out there, but we are unlikely to ever encounter it in our lifetimes due to the vast distances involved.
I really don't give an elevated ejaculation for what the latest LLVM can produce. It is not intelligence. From what I've seen so far, it's not even especially useful. Wake me up when co-pilot can produce something that would pass a code review*.
-A.
*Reviewed by me, obviously.
I suffered Lotus Notes. As an email client it was awful.
Then they made us use Exchange and Outlook. So far as I can tell this is actually meant to be an email system, among other things. Somehow it was far, far worse in that role than the godawful Notes (/Domino) thing.
Some achievement.
-A.
I assume that K.A.Stroud is the Ken Stroud of Coventry Polytechnic, where I was a very poor student.
I work now with a very competent mathematician who, presented with my Coventry textbook by Stroud, (Engineering Mathematics) declared it to be the best tome on the subject she had ever read, and is now inflicting it on her son. Poor chap,
-A.
Additionally, and not coincidentally, the publishers had to insert the ads themselves. This gave an opportunity to ensure minimum production values and that the content fitted editorially.
Online advertising, as currently construed, gives precisely zero control to the publisher over what is embedded in their publications. Can you tell?
Publishers should go back to selling ad space themselves. They should serve it themselves, and assume responsibility for it. In return they can take back control over their ratecards.
-A.
Same here.
My first proper foray into Linux was Red Hat (after a Slackware dabble), but I really couldn't get on with Gnome, so I jumped to SuSE which was big on KDE in those days. I liked KDE a lot, and YaST too, but all too often it just gave up on resolving package dependencies and insisted on manual intervention. Which is understandable, but annoying. Much more than annoying was that version upgrades almost always ended up with no GUI at best, or an unbootable system. So I tried the emerging Ubuntu thing, and APT seemed, by comparison to be completely indestructible. I've moved to Mint and Debian now, and can't see any reason to ever go back the the RH ecosystem.
-A.
Not in the slightest bit weird. I've never heard of it, and you have precisely zero knowledge of my professional obligations. But since you're interested, I'm not in any of the countries or industries mentioned in the report linked from the article. Neither am I professionally responsible for any kind of system administration or data security oversight.
-A.
In my CompSci student days we were still working on dumb terminals connected to minicomputers. I read an article on password security which, among its practical tips, suggested that if your system allowed it, include one or more control codes. So I tried it. And, to my slight surprise, the program for changing passwords did indeed allow the inclusion of control codes. Unfortunately the program for actually logging in didn't, so I had just locked myself out.
-A.
"Altman, an OpenAI co-founder, was ousted after the board carried out a probe and concluded he had not been completely honest and forthright in his conversations with the directors"
Come on, in the new Reg linguistic configuration the substantive is "ouster" and the past participle must therefore be "oustered".
-A.