When does Google turn in to Big Brother?
There is a very interesting trend in these comments. They seem to split into roughly three groups.
The first set of commentards are those who are taking exception to the CSCO example, who mostly seem to have missed the main point of the article being about a defacto monopoly of search that could be used in an anti-competitive manner. After all, you could always go somewhere else, maybe AskJeeves. Oh. I see what you did there.
The second set seem to think that there is no problem with Google adjusting search results to suit its own ends. For most of the Western world's Internet users (maybe Eastern and Southern as well for all I know) Google is the Internet. Even well educated, politically astute, people of my acquaintance think that Google == Internet. The trouble is then, that these people can easily be directed to sites that Google wants them to go to, or away from other sites. This seems to be an obvious monopoly position that can be used in an anti-competitive way. AFAIK this is against the law in most Western capitalist countries. In fact it sounds a little like a totalitarian state trying to control the proles.
The third set of commentards, of which I count myself a member, are worried by the way in which Google has started to drift away from its original egalitarian search. Unfortunately we seem to be in a minority here.