Location
So, if these girls are going to be turned away from London, where are they going to be sent to? Coventry, Manchester, maybe Glasgow?
Enquiring minds want to know (so we can avoid them, of course.)
1589 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2009
Personally, my money is on Nokia going bankrupt before they can get any adjudication either way.
As for the bit about 'unknowingly' or not, that is Apple's polite way of saying that it is possible to patent almost anything these days, even when it is completely obvious. The theory goes that if you re-create a patented item, you must have done so be reading the Patent, and are therefore effectively breaching copyright. What Apple are saying is that this did not happen.
<-- What's the IT angle of this story? It has nothing to do with technology, only about commercial law.
On what planet is it a bad, or even unexpected thing, that a music recommendation service does not recommend stuff that is is unable to supply?
How stupid would it be if it recommended tracks and then told you that it didn't have them?
Also really disappointed that the article did not even mention lyrics, or the fact that I for one, prefer cover versions that are different from the original - and usually can't be bothered with ones that sound really similar to the original - this system seems to be designed to recommend the former, and ignore those that have some originality.
So, first you ask people if their kit is past it or not, then ask them how much hassle it is to support it? And you are surprised to hear that people who think their kit is sh!t also think that it might take a lot of effort?
And all this from a vendor-sponsored survey that has a vested interest in selling more kit.
Actually, the reverse is probably closer to the truth - how much time is wasted learning how to support flashy new kit that will run the latest version of Word and Excel, with new bugs in them, when even the best typist in the world cannot type faster than 68000 processor can respond.
a) Mersenne primes are a special case, and therefore there is no obvious reason to think that they are infinite.
Alternatively, note that the average gap between each prime increases exponentially over the smaller numbers. Extrapolating towards infinity, there must be an infinite gap between the last two primes, and therefore if the penultimate prime is finite, the last one must be greater than infinite, and therefore does not exist, making what I just described as the penultimate prime is actually the final one.
So, this will have two large electric motors, a medium-sized petrol engine, a medium-sized battery, a petrol tank, a large alternator, all of the direct-drive hardware including gearbox, and maybe room for a passenger or two...
How much is this going to weigh, and what is the REAL mpg figure going to be? (ie not the one where the manufacturer assumes that it will be charged overnight from a solar-cell and only driven two miles per day.)
"The firm had planned to take Pirate Bay legit by negotiating licensing for the hundreds of thousands of illegally-shared files it tracks."
I'm thinking that you forgot to add a smiley to that bit, or something. Yes, that is what GGF had _sais_ they planned to do, but it was such a ludicrous idea that no one seriously believed it, including whichever El Reg reporter did the honours the first time this was mentioned.
The trouble with things like this is there is no feedback loop: what is needed is direct budgetary control - then people can make their own decisions on how much money should go to education vs health, whether taxes should go up or services go down...
Anyway, sounds like a good starting point, somewhere better than the zero consultation that we currently get.
It really is about time that we were able to vote directly on policies, instead of career politicians.
A good start would be a way to indicate preference for higher taxes versus higher spending, on a simple 1-5 scale - everyone ticks box 1, then taxes rocket; half vote for 2 and half vote for 4, then we get a dead heat and no change to the budget.
"Perhaps Lewis can word things a bit more clearly in future?"
Good one - that had me laughing for twenty minutes! Lewis has never been a fan of balanced reporting!
Seriously though, what is this obsession with looking only at the base cost of something?
If we buy american kit, then the cost is absolute.
If we buy British kit, then even if it appears slightly more expensive, what we get is: a big fat VAT check (most of the time, maybe not for military kit), 20% of the wage bill goes straight back to the government as income tax; 18% of the remainder comes back as VAT on the stuff that has been bought with those wages;
Knock-on sales are made to other countries, sometimes of new kit, and sometimes of our refurbished cast-offs.
Of course _you_ have the right to install OSX on whatever you like, (probably).
What you don't have the right to do is re-sell another companies products in a way that they have expressly forbidden.
The car analogy initially made was too simple: this is like one of the kit-car companies insisting on being able to buy engines intended for the Pagani Zonda and fitting it to their own chassis. You could argue that Pagani have a monopoly on sports cars beginning with the letter Z, but it is not an abusive position.
So many people are focussing on the failure to record the details, but surely it is just as much of a fail that someone in her position should be taken in by those details in the first place. (Assuming she actually bothered to look, as opposed to just ticking a check box to say that she had read them, which seems far more likely.)
If you really think that the cowon devices are superior, then you really need to ask yourself what the company is doing wrong when it can't sell a device that has (according to you) a better spec than an iPod. Maybe it is you that is wrong and the iPods are actually a better deal all-round?
As for the negative tone at the end of the article, and in some of the comments - MS builds things for backwards compatibility, and does it badly. Here we have evidence that Apple are building things with genuine forwards-compatibility and you are COMPLAINING about it? WTF?
None of our major politicians can remeber what it is they actually believe in, which is radically different from what their respective parties tell them they should believe in, which in turn is radically different from what they will even _try_ to deliver, (if elected.)
<- Burn them all, and Murdoch too.
Why did you have to drag Israel into this conversation?
If we are being fair, the big issue over there was caused by the British (and friends) telling one bunch of people it was perfectly okay for them to take control over a land that was already inhabited. Pointing the finger at the Israelis for throwing tear gas and rubber bullets at kids throwing petrol bombs, and sending tanks looking for rocket-launch sites is a ridiculous over-simplification of the situation.