Posts by Paul 87 174 posts • joined 12 Jun 2009
By far the biggest headache with IPv6 is that they stop being easy for human's to read and comprehend
An experienced network engineer can look at the issued IPv4 ranges on a PC and work out why they may be having issues accessing the internet / network resources / VPN etc.
To do the same on IPv6 takes a lot more knowledge and understanding, if it's even possible at all
Therefore, pain in the arse to switch over.
It'd be brilliant if this time around, someone started by asking the staff what they *need*, things that they need to save time on. Don't even start with asking them to think about what's possible for "technology" to do, find out what takes the time and then analyse what can actually be streamlined with off the shelf solutions, and what may need custom solutions.
There's lots of *ideas* on what may help, but until you talk to the people doing the work, and test whether your solution actually saves time, then you don't know what'd work.
The practice of assumed consent could work if the data was truely anonymous, as in providing grouped results only and no individual lines of data.
However, that means medical researchers have to know what questions that they want to ask, and someone will have to constantly process those requests. Even then, that also means that in the very act of gathering and centralising that data, there's the likelyhood that someone will leak it or hack into the system.
Thus, I am unconvinced that any approach to gather data into a single place is a good idea, and would personally be far happier if my medical record was something I, personally, kept with me and took to appointments.
It's really not hard
If the government thinks people are as aware as they should be, then switch it around to an "Opt In" approach
Tell people the positives of the scheme, let them *chose* to take action.
Oh, what's that? You don't think many people will bother
Well what on earth does that tell you about your stupid scheme huh??
I'm surprised NCP and the other large carpark owners haven't planned ahead.
They could literally get paid twice for people to park, once for the car park charges, and once for the EV top-up.
Even if they only fitted all the spaces on the edge of the carpark, where it'd be easier to run the cables, they could very easily move to dominate the charging market.
Yes, it's exactly this kind of scenario that automated driving technologies will be most useful.
However to fully function, all the vehicles need it, and ideally you need some form of central control to monitor and make decisions based on all the vehicles.
"In response, Clearview AI told The Register that it does not have contracts with, nor provide access to, customers in the European Union."
This is not the defence you think it is Clearview AI
GDPR says do not process the data, not "don't then sell it back to European customers"
Crap like this is why I do not have any pictures of me online, tagged with my identity. Saw it coming 25+ years ago and haven't changed my practices since.
It's an interesting point to consider
Should governments be reliant on corporations to make decisions about what does, and does not constitute an acceptable use of their platforms?
Current thinking trends towards lax regulation in the name of free enterprise, and as such the same rules which allow corporations to trade without government interference, support that they are also free to choose to take down content that they deem damaging to their brand.
There's also an arguement that stock exchange listed corporations are legally required to protect their brand, as they must work to maximise shareholder value and return, so again the free market mandates that socially popular actions are taken.
Finally it highlights that Freedom of Action is never the same as Freedom from Consequence, Parler deliberately chose to embrace people active in the far-right and deliberately made policies designed to support and encourage hate speech against other groups. By chosing not to have an effective, scalable moderation policy and by not clamping down on known problem speakers in their early days, they sowed the seeds of their own destruction.
Have two like this!
The first features a lovely young lady from another country, now English wasn't her first langauge but she usually managed pretty well with most words. One day she takes a call into the support line where there were some S.M.A.R.T. error messages appearing on a client's computer, so she dutifully logs the call and passed it down to the relevant team to handle.
Within minutes the Hardware Manager is on the phone to her and asks her to open the ticket and re-read what she'd put
"Client has a hard d*ck failure" she'd typed in error
As she does so, the Hardware manager quips "well love you'd be better off handling that one than me" (he was a dirty old bastard too!)
-----------------
The second one is tamer, having to talk a developer out of their chosen abbreviation for Cumulative Totals was well, a rather more lengthy discussion than I'd anticipated. He swore up and down that no one would read it that way and my arguement was that as part of the customer facing team, who had to train the user on the feature there was no way I was reading out Cum budget and Cum totals on an open call!
Eventually they relented!
Had the "pleasure" of this update this morning about an hour before the El Reg article went up that'd have warned me not to update Firefox
Dear god it is absolutely dire, you can't even get into the basic "about:config" page to customise any of the out of the box settings that are on by default that you don't want.
However, their FAQ page is lying through it's teeth, you can totally roll back to a previous version if you're prepared to lose your settings / bookmarks and are willing to take a risk on a non-Google play source. Willing to bet we'll see a tonne of virus filled APK's on the internet within the next few days unless Mozilla relent or fix their "open Beta" version.....
No they wouldn't because they are not a company and thus not bound by GDPR
Someone's office however, then there may well be issues with data having been captured and processes by a third partty without notification.
Consent doesn't really come into it thoigh, because the legal basis will likely be legitimate interest, Google are gathering data to supply a contracted service. If GDPR was interepted to apply on an individual by indvidual basis then it'd be legally impossible to have any kind of voice activated device functioning
In all honesty, governments need to decide if targeted advertising is legal or not
All of this grey area crap is just vacilliating around the real question. Should you be able to gather data for people for the purposes of monetising them.
If the answer is yes, then accept that it means companies hold data on all individuals if they use devices or services offered by those companies, if not, then we've got to be prepared to pay monthly for phones, email, websites etc.
Wish software developers would stop misusing the word anonymous.
If you have a unique identifier on a record then that data is not anonymous, and indeed the app couldn't function if it was anonymous. The system has to know where every user is to be able to notify anyone in a pool of uploaded data.
Two failures, at two different data centres and both times it's a) Power related and b) Disrupts the entire opperation.
Do you think they've failed to understand why data centres have at least two of everything?? Me thinks they have fwo power supplies, both feeding into one computer and it needing both to stay awake
So basically, their business plan is to build up 10 years of losses, then offset those against an actually profitable business plan and in the mean time make sure that their CEO gets paid twice, and if possible, a third time by selling stocks in a loss making company.
The US desperately needs a business regulator that has actual teeth. This should have never got past the submission stage
Stupid part is, regional tarriffs can be avoided by big companies. Make the goods in China, ship them to a nearby third country to a distributor who gets at best a penny on the dollar, who tightens the final screw, or puts on the outer case and voila, product of the Phillapines ready for sale to the US
So, basically they've setup a "secret" zone, then go and have a press release with the name and the fact it exists.
Kinda opposite of a secret really.
Not to mention why on earth would you want information deemed to be critical for National Security on the internet. If it were me, I'd setup an entirely seperate network using a non-standard communication method.
Finally! A task for machine learning that isn't creepy.
They should program an a.i. to analyse flight data over tens of thousands of aircraft to build a model of what "normal" looks like, and use that to help handle scenarios when the instruments are malfunctioning.
For example, some combinations of say airspeed and climb rate simply wouldn't hold up, so if one said you were slowing down, and the other said you were diving, then you can kick in a default of "fly level" or "check other instruments"
Unfortunately, accounting practices can be incredibly vague and hard to follow to the untrained.
For example, an annual contract, you can book the cash in immediately, but book the cost out monthly as it's occurred. You *should* record that you have a potential liabilty in the mean time but if you want to boost the profitability, you'll skip that part.
Nothing illegal per se, but do it often enough and your business position at any one time will look significantly better than you'd expect because the costs are hidden.
That's not including out and out fraud whereby invoices are manufactured, as appears to have happened to Patisse Valarie
The more censorship that's needed, the more we try and stamp out hateful ideas by blocking them away, the more the terrorists win in their goals.
The far right lunatics *want* a police state, they *want* people to be oppressed and restricted in what they can and can't say.
It's a horrendous event, but lets drag the ideas expressed out into the light and ridicule them, make a joke out of them and expose them for the pathetic rantings that they are. If it were legal to do so, I'd suggest putting the idiot naked into a perspex cage, with one way sound, and let people point and laugh at what a pathetic example of humanity he is.
I work for a software company that had to deploy MTD into our product.
It's been an absolute ballache, start to finish. HMRC are *still* changing the specification and requirements, including remembering to implement some actual security beyond a token.
What's more, this is just the start, there's every likelyhood that we'll see requests for more and more data each year, likely to the point of taking complete invoices and VAT numbers to spot fraud.
Re-read their statement
They said only four people *complained*
That isn't to say that's the same number of people who accessed the data, nor is it the number of customer accounts displayed incorrectly.
It's just the number of people who could be bothered to contact Three about the issue.
Interesting thought exercise, if, by means of automatically inferred location data, a company targets you for special offers via adverts, could you argue that the decision making process harms another person by virtue of them not meeting the criteria, and therefore the decision made automatically and with no oversight, isn't permitted under GDPR?
Could kill off the entire targeted ads business once and for all
Despite having an entirely blank location history in my downloaded data, no app installed for the past 5 years, and repeatedly detagging, removing any check ins etc. Facebook is still able to serve up "Amber Alerts" in an approximate location.
All because it has kept and retained over 10 years worth of IP address history, which apparently can't be deleted.
So yeah, they're lying assholes
Doom was what started me on learning IT skills. From hacking a monochrome screen 386 work laptop to run the shareware version, to getting my parents to buy a top of the line PC where I eventually cut my teeth learning to install and configure Windows after installing OS/2 by accident.
The level creator, especially for Doom 2, was a big influence in trying to understand just how computers worked, as much as it was having to auto-compress files to save HDD space via batch scripts or reconfigure config.sys and autoexec.bat after games like System Shock and Dark Forces with their more demanding profiles
Think this has highlighted a serious design flaw in their infrastructure
Not that the failure happens, I meant we all know that IT can and will fail at the worst moments, but it comes as no surprise that service was finally restored after 5pm. Strongly suspect that the system coming back up took a lot longer than expected because everyone kept trying and trying to use the network, but come 5pm, the volume of calls drops, the number of phone restart attempts stops, and the system gets breathing room to come back up.
It's exactly this kind of reason as to why I was so resistant to the Windows 10 concept in the first place. Had no choice but to end up using it due to work, and Linux isn't really an option due to a lack of desire to fight with every Windows game I want to install
However it does concern me that there's little to know repecussion for Microsoft, they can't even lose sales because they're basically giving it away....
Maybe they should put less effort into fighting this and more effort into giving their platform sufficient value that we'd actually hand over money for their product?
Also, much like GDPR achieved very little other than some even more intrusive pop ups and slower site loading times, the net effect of this bill will be negligable. Very few people care about their privacy
It's easy to call people numptys and other names for clicking on malware links but it's all too easily done.
IT security should be built on the assumption that humans are dumb, and will click things without thinking.
What matters now is whether or not Bourne Leisure responds properly to this, whether they can justify the data they're holding and if they take steps to prevent the same issue occuring.
Is this some kind of price tag designed to further the "old boys" network approach to IT?
Sure, dedicated training sessions might top £1000, but we're looking at an event that is an opportunity to go and pay even more money, to get that dedicated training.
I think I'll spend that money on a few training sessions and exams
This is where there's a huge difference between equality and equity, on paper Uber pays men and women the same hourly rate, for the same journey. Great.
However, as their analysis shows, there's factors that cause a gender pay gap to be present, which include time spent driving (likely due to domestic demands), trips picked up (men doing more to game the system) and it wouldn't surprise me if mem worked more unsocialable hours than women too.
All of this combines to factors which if you want true equity between the genders, meaning women need to get paid more per trip.
Every software vendor is going to have these cockups, where Malwarebytes let me down was there was no obvious place to get information, and no communication via the account email or the patching mechanism to acknowledge the problem or that it'd been fixed
So yeah, fuck ups happen, but lack of proactive communication is what costs you customers
The Register - Independent news and views for the tech community. Part of Situation Publishing
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022
