It's a time thing...
Hopefully once any kinks with Trixie are worked out, we'll have time for an x86 version. No promises, small team with lots to do.
2737 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2009
1. It's not Raspberry Pi foundation, it's Raspberry Pi ltd. Foundation just own a lot of shares, but have nothing to do with product development at all.
2. The closed source firmware blob has got smaller and smaller with each generation of Pi. Nowadays on the Pi 5 it does very little. All the real work is now done in open source drivers.
3. The RP1 chip on the Pi5, which encompasses most of the Piness of the device is entirely designed and developed by Ltd, so they have complete control over it, Broadcom is irrelevant to it.
Wow, so much wrong in this post.
The firmware blob on the Pi5 (and now earlier models as well) does very little. Nowadays, it's really just thermal control and boot, it's there to get the system up and running, and to make sure the SoC doesn't overheat. Most of what used to be in the firmware (you know, 12 years ago) is now all open source Arm side code (3D, codec, cameras, display etc). Pi have put a lot of effort into getting as much out of the firmware and open-sourced as possible.
Because most of what used to be in the firmware is now in the kernel or userspace, that means a lot of it could be upstreamed, and has been. So the vanilla Linux will work. There are a few areas where code has not been upstreamed - anyone who has tried to upstream, knows how much of a PITA it can be - but it is still all open source in the Pi Github repo. Once Linux is booted, Linux is in control of everything except the thermal stuff. This is a good thing and means if Linux (or its own thernal control) crashes, the firmware can still stop the device overheating.
Basically your comment is about 8 years out of date and your comment on Debian, is, well, a bit weird.
1. Raspberry Pi trading diverged from the Foundation 13 years ago and has been run as a profit centre ever since. The IPO made little difference to that.
2. Freeloading? Raspberry Pi contribute a lot back to the Linux kernel, libcamera, MESA etc. If you are going to accuse people of freeloading, at least start with those who do not contribute back. Which is probably every other SBC supplier.
3. You can indeed get cheaper devices. There is a reason they are cheaper. Cheap Chinese chips, no support, crap warranty, no continuation of supply for a start. It's a long list.
Disagree. It clearly worked. It's still a prototype, a few rough edges, but it worked. Starlink launches are going to be the bread and butter for starship. Ignore the moon shots, the real money is Starlink launches - get that working and by default you get a long way to the moon/Mars flights anyway.
"No wonder there were so many bugs in the first place."
For anyone who actually wants to know about the bugs rather than just grandstanding, all the known errata are listed in the datasheet, and this also states which have been fixed and which have been mitigated in the A4 stepping. https://datasheets.raspberrypi.com/rp2350/rp2350-datasheet.pdf, appendices C and E. 28 known errata on the A2, 11 full fixes in A3/A4, with a further 6 mitigated, leaving about 11, mostly very obscure but the datasheet has workarounds.
Hands up anyone who knows how modern chip design and testing is done!
Not you elsergiovolador.
You really are showing a lack of knowledge of the domain here. Have you actually read the hacking challenge results and seen what was done to "hack" the original RP2350? It's pretty heavy duty stuff. In the same way that software, despite much testing, still has vulnerabilities, so does hardware. Hackers are clever people, especially the ones who figure out all these glitching attacks. And they also have lots of time to target very specific areas. If companies had as much time to do the same over the whole chip, they would do it, but it would take 20 years to get product out of the door and instead of 90cents, the RP2350 would cost $50. As a company, you simply cannot think of everything, or get it perfectly right all the time, and timescales limit the total testing possible. The RP2350 was designed and tested by very experienced people and went through a year of testing.
I think you mean the right giving the impression they are doing more for the ordinary people. They are not, of course, but people believe them when they say they are.
Also odd that you mention media personalities on the left. The US president is the bigliest of media personalities. Bigger than anything on the left. Although he isn't hugely wealthy (because he's not a good businessman), he making sure he's getting that way.
Interesting take. To play devil advocate, Microsoft/American SW companies in general make a lot of money out of the rest of the world, and generate many of the CVE's. Why should the rest of the world pay to track CVE for America's buggy software? Perhaps the funding should be in relation to the number of CVE based on country of origin? If US has 75% of the CVEs, then they should pay 75% of the cost? Does anyone know the percentage figures for CVE country of origin?
You need to tell the Pi it's being supplied with 5A with the appropriate config.txt entry if your PS can supply 5v5A. If its USB-PD, then check it can supply 5A at 5v, most cannot. 25W from the PoE is absolutely fine, in fact overkill for the 500 unless you have lots of high power USB devices attached.
I'd like you to provide a source too.
I want to know where all these millions of jobs are going to come from. Please note, they need to be roughly equivalent to the current pay levels of any sacked employees in order for the tax receipts to be roughly the same. i.e Not just jobs that miraculously appeared once you throw out all the illegal immigrants.
Then they see a Starship launch, and realise that a company isn't just its head, but a huge number of other people, actually run by someone who isn't Musk, and realise it ain't too bad.
SpaceX are a great company, with a head who has gone a bit off the rails. But it's still a great company doing great things irrespective of the guy in charge.
Quite. These things learn (AIUI - could be completely wrong) in a similar way to humans - lots of repetition and lots of source data. Just faster. So the results are similar to what you might be from an average human trained on the same data. Do we accuse humans of theft when they draw a picture that looks a bit like someone else's picture? No, but copyright maybe infringed.
Same with text, there are only (according to Booker) 7 plot lines - so all books have their basis in those 7 plotlines, or are derivatives of those plotlines. Writers take those plotlines and build around them in their own style. Is it any different with AI?
Dunno, but it's all quite interesting.
The additional cost for the NVME components is actually fairly high. Its not just the board components, but a new casing with hatch, because splitting the case to fit the drive is a no-no for a consumer product.
Of course, there is no need for the NVME drive for many many use cases, the faster SD card capabilities of the 2712 SoC when combined with command queueing means that even with an SD card the device is very useable, and for most people good enough.