Shock collars?
He makes it sound like he tried. Guess they should invest in waterproof keyboards that can be operated with flippers.
2547 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Jun 2009
It seems that a length of 14 alone, e.g. '11111111111111', will get rated as Strong, but to get Best you need a lower case letter, upper case letter, number and special character, e.g. 'bT@11111111111' or 'Kevin6@gmail.com'. I wonder if anyone decided to use their email address as their password on this website's advice?
Yes, it's for the PR. Makes it more concrete in the public mind. Any Senator or pundit can emphasise, "and they STILL haven't extradited Wen, Wang, Sun, Huang and Gu". Can you specify any secret economic data stolen in the Bermudan phone calls, or name the people who stole them? No? Then it's all theoretical.
"Also, how many many mips are expended looking for "stoned" on a daily basis?"
Probably, remarkably few. The days when AV was 'search target for pattern 1, search target for pattern 2, …' were over within 5 years of Stoned. More efficient search techniques are used, so Stoned and thousands of other malware sharing some pattern will be eliminated high up in the decision tree.
Well, you're right… the murder rate in Japan is 0.3, five times the gun death rate of 0.06. Stopping people using guns only makes them look for another weapon.
In USA, the murder rate (4.8), is only 1.5 times the gun death rate (3.6). Some people are going to kill other people no matter what, but limiting their choices does seem to discourage the less-determined would-be murderers.
Aren't Japanese press highlighting torima cases because they are exceptional? When it happens every day, it's no longer news.
@dotdavid OK, there's a threshold for population density below which bus and other public transport becomes infrequent and inconvenient. I suspect that the threshold is lower than you think - any town there is a problem with road congestion is probably dense enough to benefit from a good bus service. As for the costs, everyone having their own car is an enormous capital cost and continuous fuel cost.
You mention people being forced to abandon their cars, yes, many people have a deep, personal attachment, somehow it's part of their identity (or a symbol of their virility?). This makes it difficult for people to realise that, to live closer together, they need to share more. Personally, I find not having a car liberating, it's cheaper, I don't have to find parking spaces, I can drink, if the traffic is bad I can hop off and walk.
The problems for delivery vans apply the same to using a self-drive car for an unattended grocery run.
Better utilisation of the family self-driving car would probably increase the number of empty trips, and therefore increase congestion and decrease fuel efficiency. A self-driving taxi would be good, except that it also falls foul of the "my car, my identity" syndrome.
Sergey Brin, and others that see self-driving cars as a solution for people that are "under served by the current transport system" are missing an achievable existing solution: public transport. People who anticipate sending their car to collect their shopping are overlooking the efficiency of a delivery van, that can deliver groceries for you and, say, a dozen neighbours in one trip versus 12 self-drive cars clogging up the roads.
As an example of how public transport can work, look at Hong Kong, with a tenth of the vehicles per capita of USA and buses on most routes at 10 minute intervals. If 9 out of 10 urban Americans abandoned their cars, there would be enough demand for frequent, convenient public transport.
I admire the improvements in self-driving technology, but see it more as a niche solution. Maybe, one day, a self-driving bus would be even better, if it can answer passengers' questions and deploy the wheelchair ramp safely when needed.
@Lazlo Woodbine - did you clean the drive heads? Or perhaps one of the drives was borderline mis-aligned?
I never did understand the design "feature" that placed the most dust-sensitive component directly in front of the power supply, dragging air through it and out the back.
Well, both those have been happening: Some people have been saying for a very long time, "these powers are dangerous to democracy", and, recently, lots of people have been shocked that the targets have included USA citizens and allies.
However, the problem with 0-days is that, not only do they allow the good guys to spy on the bad guys, they allow the bad guys to spy on the good guys. Of course, there is a lot of context-specific risk balancing. If the NSA find a 0-day in "the most popular encryption software used in North Korea, rarely used outside", then there could be a reasonable argument for keeping it hidden. Or, if the nature of the 0-day makes the NSA confident that it can detect when someone else discovers it, they could plan to reveal it at that time, and use it until then. Heartbleed is the opposite of both of these: the library is used almost everywhere, and it is (virtually?) impossible to tell if someone else discovered and used it.
Anyone who discovered Heartbleed and kept it hidden deliberately reduced everyone's security.
Isn't this an admission that the NSA is useless? Regardless of whether they think (or you agree) that their most important mission is protecting "friendly" communications or intercepting "enemy" communications, with their funding they should have found this bug. Why didn't they use the old, "neither confirm nor deny" to keep some semblance of competence?
I don't see much distinction between an overtly malicious app and deliberately selling the user a false sense of security. They are knowingly putting their customer in harms way.
Plus, considering Aslan's comment below, "Google Play only runs an automated check to see if an App is malicious", it is quite possible that it was a wannabe malicious app developer who found the auto-checks too difficult to get past, and took an easy route to the money. All the same intent is there.
OK, Squander Two, you're getting closer to my point, but I'm not saying that doing anything in milliseconds is inherently economically unvaluable, just that an ultra-fast stock market does not benefit the wider society. A good stock market directs investments into activities the society finds most useful, but HFT happens so fast it is all about what my algorithm thinks your algorithm is about to do, not the economic data that changes on much slower timescales. The value of, say, a company that manufactures high-speed switches to society does not change in milliseconds. The HF Traders trying to grab the money as it goes past faster than anybody else, but, as a result, they are making the system more unstable. An audio system designer will build in high frequency cutoff, not stick in a UHF amplifier, however useful a UHF amplifier is in another circumstance.
Valuable economic activity takes place on slow timescales; days to build a car, months to grow a crop, decades to grow a tree. The stock markets fluctuate according to what people think other people will do, or, for HFT, what algorithms think other algorithms will do.
Take a high-quality audio system and stick a UHF amplifier into it. Turn the gain up. Does the music quality improve?
they always talk about "natural substances", but penicillin is perfectly natural, not that I'm suggesting eating mouldy bread is a guarantee for good health. Other natural things include lions, malaria and molten lava. I am not responsible for any injury that may occur when attempting to dilute a volcano.