I dont think that means the breach went further, I think it just means they used their standard mailing list to contact victims, rather than actually working out the correct list.
902 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jun 2009
Ah , thanks Bunbury.
something to think about there.
Is there much manufacturing of actual things going on in this country?
Could the exporter not just rent an ice cream van in target country and sell from there?
Are we paying £50m a day to be in the EU just so we cant charge import duty on all the EU things?
I guess its all about how much cash and stuff goes in and out, ie the trade deficit
Can somebody tell me what the benefits of EU membership are? Apart from me being able to buy a years supply of fags at a less extortionate price when I go to EU land.
I'm serious. Not even in that televised debate did (whoever Farrage's no name opponent was) manage to give a reason for having the EU.
I've tried googling it but still not found anything solid just politicians rhetoric.
I *have* heard mutterings about "trade" . But what about trade? why does it make trade better? we still manage to trade with non EU countries so whats the difference? (as evidenced by all the i-things flooding the country)
p.s. awesome news with the lander , hope we get good news with non-thruster assisted ice screwing in 4 hours
Yeah but you dont get the full range of "things" do you - even after making all that effort to go the shop and look at the things, then perhaps trawl round a few more shops to find a suitable thing, your choice of things is still extremely limited. If you had just sat on your arse and typed the name of the thing you wanted into google youd have found a much better thing at a much smaller cost that would shortly arrive at your house. And even then once you've "looked at" or even "touched" the thing if it turns out you dont like it distance selling rules mean they have to take the thing back.
If your wourld domination plan is as well thought out as your shopping strategy I'm not too worried just yet.
So shops cant compete because they pay extra to gather together in the same place , making that place inaccessible to customers. Theres the flaw right there.
The only reason for keeping the High street I spotted in the article was nostalgia. Perhaps Amazon etal could make there shopping interface into a First person 3D virtual blah blah. Then you can choose your own skin - Diagon Alley , Rodeo Drive, 5th avenue etc
As far as I'm concerned the high street , with it plethora of problems ( i got up to abot 20 in previous posts) cant die off soon enough. The only issue with the new world order is that I'm never bloody in when the postman turns up. To remedy this I suggest much bigger letterboxes or lockers on houses and if the packege needs a signature: some kind of clever encrypted digital certificate authority type thing so that the courier can prove he dumped it in your box.
(after all the existing signature, albeit done with a touchscreen, is as useless if not more useless than when we used to write on cheques with a pen - absolutey ZERO security value. I cant believe they are still in use but they are)
Re: You tell me it was a damp squid
Thats a great Idea mtech I am going to do that , you can disclaim all you want , but unless you've paid a parasitical blood sucking drain-on-society lawyer to rubber stamp it it dont mean shit. So i blame you for my actions.
DISCLAIMER this too is a joke. I hereby declareclaim i can discliam my own claims without professional help , contrary to all of the above.
Re: 3hrs in IMAX?
Theres no way in hell I'm sitting still in a small seat with 200 other people for 3 hours!
never mind paying £15 quid for it!
Theres a reason you can buy a projector that'll give you 100" screen at home for £250 (or £600 for a decent one) - so you can watch movies like you were at the cinema without the:
4) Paying £15
5) Paying a further £10 for food n drink
6) Sitting with a load of teenage knobheads
7) not being able to pause it and go for a piss
8) Not Being allowed to drink beer
9) not beoing allowed to smoke
10) not being able to stretch your legs out on comfy furniture
11) Being Deafened
12) sitting through 30 minutes of ads for shit you have no interest in
13) having to start at a specific time
did I miss anything ?
Yeah but "my" followed by a singular noun does pretty much the same:
My wife , my car , my computer. Still implies , albeit maybe not quite as definately , that you only have one.
hmmm "my kids" - only one group of kids? Wait a minute that works for Wives too.
The = definate article
My = ?
A = ?
the human equivalent of dogs pissing up a tree-trunk
Spot on Potsherd. Some graffitti (er , i mean street art or whatever) is really cool but Its amazing how shit 99% of it is. Just a "tag". Its like theyve tried really hard to ensure that there is nothing artistic , intresting or aesthetic about it at all.
Even the murals in Northern Ireland look like a 6 year olds art class fridge picture.
I noticed other countries have a far better standard of Street vandalism.
Re: My dad and my brother...
I too thought simple engines were nice till I learned how the new ones worked. Carburettors can fuck right off into the dustbin of history as far as I'm concerned. You noticed how cars start in the morning and decent mpg these days? thats cos carbs have finally been ousted.
And in order for this story to be in thereg rather than 5th gear he should have got the raspberry pi to run the fuel injection and the sparks :)
Re: Well lets name them....
but whats "screening detection" ? if its new malware not detected by AVG or whatever the ad companies have installed on the machines that takes submissions , then they'd have a job as hard as the AV companies to detect anything. If they are detected by standard AV then who cares your machine should defend itself
isnt she right in theory? - i mean if it was secure , hyportheticlly , in la la land , then everyone could vote on all sorts of things . a referendum every week.
That one dismissive nosensical sentence dismissing any security problem - thats where she's a bit batshit. oh , and the whole 'net made by men thing , because if she boycotted all things made by men she'd be left with :
Compilers ( yes the IT ones)
"Everyone knows an app is basically the same as software" waddya mean basically?
Something really irks me about this "is there an app for that" phenomenon. All of a sudden people realise that computers can be made to do useful things by running a program on them. Why has it taken this long to transmit this message to the non techy? Its not like the self explanatory term "application" has only just been coined. Instead all we got was years of:
"ooh i dont understand computers" (and am unwilling to even consider if that would be possible)
"whats the point of that?"
"why dont we just keep using paper?"
And then Apple develops the first useable smartphone ,therefore people have to know how a computer can help them , so in one fell swoop they explain the concept of running a "program" on a computer:
All it takes is a 30 second jingly advert full of hip music and cool kids (and examples of computers being helpful) and repitition of the phrase "Is there an app for that?" and suddenly the world "gets it"
I think we have to thank Apple for that, as , in time , people will realise they can get "apps" on their desktops and laptops too.
torture and kidnapping
I'm not buying the "Biometrics are bullshit because I'll get my eyes gouged out and my thumbs cut off" angle.
This can still happen in order to exctract your password. The reason it dosent is because most of this sort of thing happens remotely.
In fact assuming these bio check designers are thoughtful enough to require Alive thumbs and retinas or whatever , this might keep you alive longer .
Re: Confession - OED
"The OED records common usage, not proper usage."
Does it? where does it say that?
Also by the sounds of that explanation the only reason we have "an hotel" is because half the population will dump the H making the 'an' correct , and the other half get to sound awfully superior by pronouncing both the H and the 'an' , whilst actually being incorrect as the 'an' was only put there to prop up those who couldnt be arsed pronouncing the H.
p.s. H is pronounced "aitch" . If you pronounce it using an H, ( or should that be a H) then go take Bill Hick's advice.
Re: petrochemicals -- just, not fossil fuels
"And we can burn as much of these as we like with impunity provided A & B "
You can burn as much as you can find. There is a HUGE difference. We stopped finding things to burn in 1965. (by which i mean that the rate at which new oil fields are discovered peaked in 1965. We've found less and less every year since , and burned more and more)
Re: I hope you're right
so no cutting back from any quarter Tony? That seems to say to me that barring a miracle cure we are all doomed. All in the name of "growth" . I guess it should be us that make the scarifice, its our turn. We go eat rice for 200 years while the 3rd world finishes off the fossil fuels.
wont happen thjough:. we wont give , they wont give , we are already in the scrabble for the last drops.
Re: Clean energy NOW
"so no chance of running out any time soon"
Stars are pretty abundant in the universe too. I heard theres loads of em. And I gather they are all giving off heat. Why dont you toddle off and put a few in a wheelbarrow and bring them back. All our enrgy problems will be solved , and you'll be a hero
" If you can get enough H2 and electricity from solar to be able to completely replace your current energy providers..."
Yes that would be lovely but it aint gonna happen. The sun is dropping x amount of sunlight on the planet, the energy stored in the oil we use is the result of the sun doing that for thousands and thousands of years. And we've used up half the oil in in 150 years. and the other half will take more energy to get it out that we'll get from it.
"minerals and metals are substitutes for fossil fuel energy."
"minerals and metals are substitutes for fossil fuel energy."
An ecomomist would say that! Energy is the problem , not stuff, and the two are not interchangeable.
Lack of energy will put us back in the stone age , imminently, there might be some other energy sitting around but we're not prepared to prepare to start using it , cos its too hard.
Society will tear itself apart quickly, too quickly to adjust to the new "not a lot of energy" paradigm.