Re: Do it anyway?
Likely already are and were looking to legalise it before anyone gets the hard evidence. Whistle-blower laws a coincidence? All designed to hide the bits they don't want you knowing about.
3439 publicly visible posts • joined 11 Jun 2009
But we were still popular for our skilled high tech industries and major financial trading.
I can assure you that our major financial trading was not popular in the corridors of power in the EU. There were certainly moves afoot to neuter the City and remove whatever power could be taken. Brexit will speed up certain areas but there was always the intent to weaken the hold the City had over European finances as it doesn't suit the EU mandarins to not have absolute control over this aspect, especially when such markets smash your bond prices raising the cost of borrowing for your project.
You seem confused about predictions (and, by the way, the change in value of Sterling happened immediately after the vote, which indeed had a nasty economic effect) and *facts*.
What nasty effect was that, more competitive exports? You do realise that the exchange rate forms a balancing act between how much we export versus import don't you? If a weakened rate caused hardship due to pricier imports it kind of shows that we're importing a little too much, you know that whole unsustainable consumption part of the economy?
Bottom line is this: there are two questions: (1) shall we leave the EU? and (2) if the answer to (1) is yes, what terms?
Bottom line is this: there are two questions: (1) shall we remain in the EU? and (2) if the answer to (1) is yes, what terms?
See how that can work either way? The terms under which you'd stay were/are by no means certain. If you're thinking "the ones we currently have" then I have a bridge to sell you.
The bit that always got me about the Brexit vote was the remain campaign thought that voting against it was a vote to stay in the EU under the current circumstances, as is, ad infinitum (not sure what all of the leave camp though, wide and varied no doubt). Unfortunately this deal was never really on the table. Given the current direction of the EU - closer union, EU army, new members must adopt the Euro etc - it is quite clear that the status quo was never on the table as far as the EU was concerned and eventually there would have to be a reckoning. The UK's position would have gotten ever weaker with the majority no longer willing to be stalled by vetos from a single "not really in" member. To ignore that and think you could keep your current sweet deal is just wilful ignorance.
What is more worrisome to me is that the method of persistence is modification of the BIOS/firmware. I understand why it is done, but that would want to be some pretty well quality assured, controlled and secure software to be allowed to do that. I'm also guess a firmware flash by a competent thief nullifies this anyway.
Maybe I'm missing something with password policies I've encountered online. If a user's password is stored as a salted bcrypt hash, which is presumably then of a fixed length, why do some policies then specifiy 10-18 characters in length? I've witnessed this a number of times and unless it is an arbitrary limit based upon computational resources to repeatedly hash something what point does such a low maximum length serve - I understand the minimum length requirement? I have other accounts where I've used random 30 characters and those sites don't care and just accept them.
Can someone in the know explain this phenomenon?
That's the whole point about Big Data. It isn't about better relationships with customers etc it has always been about Big Snooping. Collect as many different data sets as possible and then link and analyse. Not that the work isn't interesting but it is certainly creepy. What a lot of people don't realise is that these data sets all end up in one place. They think data from company X and company Y never meets because they belong to rival chains but X & Y will both monetise their grandmothers for a dollar or two. Data brokers - now there's a thing.
Just think...Tweet history, followers and following, Facebook posts, likes and network graph, shopping history, electoral role data, LinkedIn or recruitment agency data etc. There is a shit-tonne of information out there to be analysed.
I think the best direction these days is to look at dd-wrt, open-wrt, tomato, gargoyle etc; decide which one you like; then look at the list of compatible hardware and choose your router from there. Vendor updates seem few and far between and only for the latest models. A decent router can last for many years - as I have little need for AC wireless my 802.11a/b/n router is still just as useful today as it was when I bought it 7 years ago - so it makes sense to go with open firmware and get timely openssl updates.
that the use of Telstra copper was a political, not an economic, mandate
Funny that, as of 28/8/2009 the Government's Future Fund (you know, the one that holds the money to cover their superannuation liabilities) held over 1.3bn Telstra shares according to this
statement from the fund itself (10+% of the company)
http://www.futurefund.gov.au/news-room/2016/11/11/media-release---future-fund-sells-34-per-cent-of-its-telstra-holding
I doubt they've made any large sales since as they normally state so.
That's a nice incentive to juice your pension pot. Before anyone dares state "but if they didn't cover it in the fund it would come out of taxation" - it just did. The fuckers.
She argued that trying to clean up the central database to remove images relating to people without charges might not be worth the time and money, especially as the cops would have to cough up themselves.
Reading that I thought "Is that the best you can come up with?". We need to keep all this illegally retained but nevertheless really handy for facial recognition data because...too hard, much cost, not worth it.
Baratov's team, meanwhile, contends this was his first run-in with the law and he was in his teens for much of the alleged activity
"The Extenuating circumstances in the instant matter are plentiful. This is Mr Baratov’s first arrest. Additionally, Mr Baratov was under the age of 22 during the majority of the time that he hacked email accounts," they argue [PDF].
To these two points I would respond:
1. First run-in with the law simply translates to first time caught breaking it
2. Who gives a shit? He was an adult and the age of criminal responsibility is substantially lower.
High Sierra is looking like Apple’s Windows ME. From what I have read on here and other sites it has been a monumental hubris filled fuck up from start to finish. Even though he could be “you’re holding it wrong” arrogant, I do not believe shit like this would have been tolerated in the latter part of Jobs’ reign.
Apple may be cash rich but it seems like there are some serious problems emerging - is the quality control a reflection of a cultural malaise?
There’s clearly two categories of IoT device here, medical implants and everything else. For the latter the OP makes a valid point. For health implants I’d argue they need to be very short range and engineered entirely different from a convenience widget.
I have always wondered how “if they have physical access the game is over” and “secure cloud services” can live together. If you don’t control the hardware, the firmware, the virtualisation layer etc how secure can it really be, especially in a post spectre/meltdown world?
Microsoft would far prefer that users stopped using Internet Explorer and adopted its Edge browser instead. Some users are proving stubborn, though: according to Net Market Share, IE still has a rusted-on 12 per cent of the browser market.
That's the price you have to pay for stepping away from the W3C standards and implementing the shit that is/was IE6 that countless organisations are now dependent upon due to legacy author-gone-bust applications using some of its various quirks.
Karma.
Am i the only one that see the irony in the 5 eyes, on one hand bleating about the security issues with Chinese gear and with the other demanding back-doors into all gear?
Whilst I understand your sentiment, would you rather they did nothing and we perhaps got royally owned due to use of the kit? They'd be absolutely slated for not pointing out the issues. Spying on your own people is shitty and used to be supposedly illegal but spying on foreigners and protecting our own comms. is their primary reason for existence.
Though registration of all drones weighing more than 250 grams will certainly happen over here
A law requiring it may certainly happen but I very much doubt compliance "certainly" will. Heck, there are some that still drive with no MoT or insurance so it's unlikely to be complied with. More likely will be its convenient use by the police to then search, fingerprint, DNA swab you etc.
Taylor said NHS Digital has developed a much more comprehensive disaster recovery plan since the WannaCry attack before embarking on a rigorous, ongoing testing regime. "The thing we’ve done since that is test, and test, and test again... when [anything] does happen, we’ll be in a much better position.”
and the point he's clearly missing is that the whole endeavour was preventable - prevention being better than a cure. Whilst it's essential to have a good well tested back-to-normal-ops plan, patching your shit would be better. Not using legacy operating systems where avoidable would be good and perhaps going for something like a Wyse terminal connecting to server sessions may be advisable (again, where appropriate).
Next time anyone says that line I'm going to ask them if they approve of the methods used by the Stasi in East Germany during the cold war.
To which the honest answer should be yes seeing as how, information wise, we are way beyond their wettest dreams already. The general public posting everything on Facebook has been a great help. Imagine going back in time and telling the head of the Stasi that in 40+ years time you wouldn't need lots of spies or torture as the public would just offer up their thoughts, opinions, relationships etc for free in a giant cesspool of searchable data because they actually believe your catchphrase (and that of every despotic regime) of "nothing to hide, nothing to fear".
Who'd have thought re-education would simply involve lowering standards of education and letting nature take its course?
Considering the US is the country in which an accomplice burglar was convicted of murder and sentenced to 95 years after a police officer shot the other burglar dead when they were trying to escape.
The US has been the undeniable leader of the worst judicial system on the planet that masquerades as being fair or just for quite some time and by quite some margin. Countries with similar systems are often just accused of being openly corrupt rather than "the land of the free" - who says they don't understand irony?
...maybe you will be motivated to only store them on a device you've bothered to look through the firmware for?
Yeah, because leading phone models never get pen-tested by independents who actually have a clue what they're looking at do they? If things like the Intel/AMD design faults get discovered I'm pretty sure ant firmware or, more importantly, hardware ones will. And that is the point, your firmware may be open but what about the hardware underneath?
There's a good reason for developers delve into AI disciplines: Companies are looking to hire AI experts. As with security, high-level talent is scarce.
As usual, companies want the latest and greatest at minimal cost. Although high-level talent may be rare, no training will be offered as self-starters are cheaper in the wage race to the bottom. This will end with people who don't know what they're doing pointing "deep learning" at every possible problem 'cos AI and swearing results they don't comprehend - obtained through a methodology they don't understand and most likely is inapplicable to the task in the first place - are gospel.
Already seeing it where I work. Apparently every problem ever can be solved though "Machine Learning". Jesus wept. The problem I want solving is "why their parents procreated".
The question is: did the bike and pedestrian reflect laser light?
My question is more "what the fuck was the supervising meat-sack doing whilst this 'testing' was going on?". I'd have though that in any such test the human in the vehicle is still ultimately in charge else why be there at all? Not sure whether it was media bias and selective edits or not but the video I saw of the inside of the vehicle showed them paying zero attention to the road ahead when the accident occurred. Not really how a supervised test is really supposed to work.