Did Footfall inspire Orion or vice versa?
Orion dates from the 1950's. Freeman Dyson's retrospective "Death of a Project" was written for Science around 1965
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
So fantasy losses.
The pitch was more like
"It'll cost a bit but we'll be able but by the end we'll most of the taxi business in most of the world. We'll be the Amazon of the taxi business and then you'll really see some money being made."
Note that at no time did I mention the word "monopoly" in this because that would be, y'know, illegal.
TL;DR Vulture capitalist thinks they got high investment/low risk/high profit deal. They didn't.
Engineering this is really quite tough. Most of the "jet packs" were in fact rockets (because jets actually have pretty poor T/W ratio unless they're attached to wings). The constantly falling mass meant take off was easy, but hovering and landing insanely tricky. Like the lunar landing simulator, but without the on board computer.
So how fast do you want to go? As you're carrying the fuel can it needs to be fuel efficient as well. My instinct is contra rotating rotor blades could be adequately quiet, relatively easy to steer and reasonably fast but sadly lacks the "coolness" factor of the turbojet whine of a supersonic airflow at your back.
That's like asking do you want a punch in the face or a knee to the groin, when you don't want either.
But note, it's not their money that's in danger.
It's yours.
And your personal details.
The app is merely a a tool for the trading company to get faster access to your money.
IOW from their PoV security not that necessary, and knowing more about their customers (as cheaply as possible) is always nice (for them).
You might like to read this
Over a 15 year period 158 companies were set up to compete with NCR.
153 of them were bankrupt by the end of that period and it was estimated NCR held 95% of all US cash register business.
If you're thinking "Well I guess they just made better products" you have a simple faith in capitalism. *
*In the special needs sense of the word.
NCR did it all.
Predatory pricing (but only when necessary. The CEO hated to lose money).
Ignoring patents of small competitors to improve their product.
Tie bigger competitors up in court if they sued.
Release shoddy fake copies of competitors goods to destroy their reputation.
Tomas Watson never saw the inside of a jail cell as the head of IBM.
But actually plonking down cold hard cash for what's actually available now with a promise of "It'll be fixed Real Soon Now."
I think not.
Which is too bad as I like the way they think. Actual knobs, Choosing voice over video (seriously, once you've seen who it is and they are talking and not showing you stuff is it that helpful?)
The worry is this is down to underspec'd processing power. The SW can be fixed, but that's if the horsepower isn't there to begin with what are they going to do?
As usual.
But hang on..
If they own the MIPS IP did that mean they did the Intel Management Engine as well?
The one with the "faulty software" that allowed a no password entry and no lockout to the deepest level of control of any Intel processor based server since 2008?
But congratulations as it seems they are about at the point the British National Space Centre was at when it was established.
Basically a "buyers club" for UK ministerial departments buying payloads and satellite services with no independent budget (operating funds chipped in by the client departments).
They promptly established a them park for space (the British Space Centre) in Leicester.
It took decades to become the British Space Agency, and get an independent budget.
Not strictly true. David Davis is quite knowledgeable on data bases and excessive state surveillance, and I suspect Tom Watson has had something of a crash course as well.
Sadly I doubt he will survive beyond the official leave date and the entry into the "transitional arrangement," WTF that is.
Then the real finger pointing and blame allocation will begin
I like that idea. It answers (and measures) the question "How can someone who seems quite intelligent hold views that are so bats**t crazy." There not stupid, they're smart in a very different direction (which makes them much more dangerous than stupid people holding these views).
"Oh, and from personal experience, I've had more than a few breaks from reality here, so I understand it a bit more than some."
I think most of suspected as much. However it's interesting that prior to the release of the Edward Snowden documents most people as cautious as Snowden has shown you have to be to preserve online privacy and security would be thought paranoid. Turns out most people aren't paranoid enough. :-( .
I keep hearing a line from "Enemy of the State" where Will Smith says of Gene Hackman "Oh, you're one of those "conspiracy" nuts," and Hackman replies "No, one of the conspirators."
Your wrong.
"Some Tory you’ve never heard of, chosen by MPs as leader on the basis that the public does not hate them yet and they cannot be worse than Theresa May. Evens"
I think that covers her.
But you're right. Working class Scottish Tory lesbian. If only she was black and in a wheel chair you'd have electoral Platinum on your hands.
I quite like the term "automagic" thinking.
<tech> "So how do you suggest we remove everything you don't like from FB/Twitter/YouTube
<politician> "Automagically of course. No humans intervention at all."
<tech> <thinks> "F**kwit"
Funny, his Ministry reckon he's pretty lazy and not really too interested in his brief.
IOW he likes the idea of being in charge as long as he doesn't have to do too much actual work, y'know, reading up on stuff and working out an opinion.
But maybe that's just sour grapes from senior civil servants.
Although he didn't see Gove had the knife out for him.
* Nice. Especially as even she (somewhere inside that brain of hers) realizes she will never be able to appoint herself "Lord High Chancellor" as hoped. When she said she expected to carry on till the next election I LOL'd.
You know the back benchers are already drawing the charges against her and Davis for their Crimes against Brexit. Jacob Rees Mogg is probably working on the first draft (along with his acceptance speech of new Tory leader).
+ Excellent point. A good rule that has served many of the spinally challenged members of the political classes.
Correct.
They, like banks and utility companies rely on customer inertia.
Because they know it works.
This will continue while they can retain customers by just bribing them for the (small) group who decide to change.
British readers. You get get the service you push for. While very few of you will push that will not change.
1) A certain proportion of their customers will damage (or possibly destroy) their "stock."
2)They will have to devote a certain amount of time and effort to restoring it, or replacing it, if they want to keep their revue stream flowing at the level they expect ('cause living like a pimp is expensive).
3)Fortunately there is an inexhaustible supply of fresh meat offering itself up (as pimps see it) to be turned out.
That's as true for Google/Apple/Microsoft/Amazon/Facebook (or GAMAF for short) as it is for Joseph Hazley (Robinson's alleged pimp).
Remember "You can't have a conscience in the pimp game" is as true for corporate data pimps as the "independent operator" and the corporations understand that well.
Now I've got to go as I'm late for a fitting of my new Eel skin boots.
Like for example financial services.
And that's where a single market really pays dividends to the UK. Both Frankfurt and Paris would like a bigger piece of that action and will have if the UK is has even minimal barriers put in to slow down its trade.
The question is what the UK will have to trade (because this is a negotiation after all) to keep the pounds/yen/dollars/euros flowing without any additional "friction" in and out of Blighty.