I did not know case sensitivity was a POSIX compatability requirement.
Very annoying.
But at least you've got a vendor neutral standard for a solid OS you can check features off against.
16330 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
Instead of by what iactually has happened, basically a faceless, uneleceted group of data fetishists.
This is not the "voice of reason."
It's a (slightly) less hysterical version of the "We must hand over our right to privacy (enshrined in the ECHR) to protect our way of life" BS.
Is Mr Hague a leaver, or a starer in the EU referendum do you think?
That's likely where all that twentysomething enthusiasm is going to come to a complete halt.
It's 2016 and somewhere out there a bunch of people are writing Accounts Receivable packages.
And at least one of them is failing.
Seriously do you think May or any of her predecessor sock puppets Home Secretaries have a blind f**king clue what Haddoop even is?
This is again being driven by data fetishist senior bureaucrats for whom more data more cross referenced now is always better (for them) by definition.
Now some might be thinking "but it'll make it more efficient"
I say does the phrase necessary and proportionate mean anything to you?
Because it is?
Metadata and traffic analysis, and the building of contact webs from them, have been the data fetishists secret weapon for a long time. Hence the NSA's reaction to the publication of "The Hut Six Story."
If we want an internet that protects freedom and privacy we can no longer treat the intermediate nodes as friendly, nor accept the paths of packets will not be tracked not because any one person threatens the state, but simply because the state can.
Which is also half the definition of psychopathic behavior in humans.
Actually for those who really want robotics to become science fact and not SF you are going to need systems that can read peoples feelings and respond to them.
Although the way supermarkets are going self service at checkouts will there be many human service jobs left for it to take over?
IOW still likely to need a bloody big expendable rocket to get it anywhere.
Mind you it has tested TPS materials to M5
Handy if one were to (just for example) be planning to build a M5 cruise missile, would it not?
Likewise if you replaced that 6.5t test vehicle with say a 500Kg "physics package" that would probably have some other uses.
So it's more like a line printer or fax than most existing systems, which are more like 3d plotters.
Nylon to start but promise of conductive (2 thou wide) tracks and ceramics as well eventually, and the high end model has a cleaning station to clean all the unused powder off the finished article, yours for a <cough> modest $25k.
But as for "risked damaging” the brand" you are f**king kidding me, right?
You can be the cartridges will cost a fortune (supposedly they will supply 200l drums of the stuff) and probably maintain HP's 1 in 3 failure rate if someone does refill them.
NASP was started by a very optimistic report from the principal promoter investigator.
When the USAF actually had an independent assessment done they found he'd even got the properties of the air flowing through the system favorably wrong.
By then the USG had spent around $1Bn+ trying to make it work.
Perhaps this is the origin of the term scamjet?
"The crazy thing is that this would probably work. All you need besides the PPP is a guy who looks good in suit and can convincingly talk weapons-grade BS for a couple of hours with a straight face. "
Hmm. Yes I can think of a few of those.
"Oh, and be careful with the pricing. The package you sell must be insanely expensive."
I think they prefer the word "reassuringly."
They will cite speed. The machines will get faster. At some point they will be faster and more accurate than a human.
They will cite safety. The first 16 patients to repair shrapnel damage to the heart killed all the patients. However they were all pigs.
They will say it doesn't care about it's patients. And?
What they won't say is it makes skills they have have spent hundreds of $1000 acquiring reproducible and (ultimately) the only surgeons you will need will be those to develop new surgical procedures. A much smaller number.
"Someone is looking at the F-14 Tomcat's, then looking back at the F-35 monstrosity and is wondering where it all went wrong.
Well the F14 was built by Grumman in NY state.
The F35 is built by LM Corp. The ba**ard child of a myriad of mergers in the US aerospace industry sanctioned (and I'm fairly sure encouraged) by the DoD to create a "national champion" because of fears individually they couldn't complete in the world arms sales market.
Much like what was BAe System was created by active encouragement of the MoD in the UK.
It's no surprise how well these companies like to work together.
About as close to an IT "Green field" site as you can get.
Former UK Home Secretary Clarke's favorite ID card example.
Yes, it's all in the details of how that system is implemented. .
The real question is do you trust your government? Because you're going to have to.
And do you trust the next one after that? And the next?
ULA have an unbroken string of 100+ successful launches up to 24 tonnes to LEO
Ariane 5 has an unbroken string of 70+ successful launches up to 16 tonnes to LEO
So far SX have managed a successful run of 18 launches before CRS7 went bang.
Since then they have accumulated another 4 successful launches, with up to 113 tonnes to orbit.
I don't think Arianespace charge their government customers an arm and a leg for their special pixie dust "mission assurance."