Maybe a fix is
for openssl to sleep() for a brief random period after doing the ECC thing, thus obscuring the time interval that the attack is trying to measure?
766 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
"After all, GNOME 2 borrowed much of its UI design and basic interface concepts from Windows 95 – and it's been a long time since Windows 95 was cutting-edge."
IIRC Win95 introduced pop-up start menu idiom as main interface to the OS. 98 kept the pop-up idiom, as did Me, as did 2000, as did 2003, as did 2008, as did Vista as did 7.
Things got more bling encrusted as time passed but the basic idiom never changed.
Qua UI, I'd say Win 95's idiom has weathered the past 16 years very well indeed. It's hardly changed at all.
Open Sourcers should perhaps stick to writing some of the best s/w the world has ever seen and leave the marketing babble to M$ & co.
"...logic and mathematics (both neurobiologically determined precepts)..."
Incorrect. As determined by empirical studies.
You have no apples. I give you an apple. I give you another apple. You do not give away the apples I gave you. Do you now have more or fewer than two apples?
Try it. Repeat as many times as you wish to. You will always have two apples.
1 + 1 = 2. Your 'brain' has nothing to do with it.
@Denarius
"... Well designed and engineered stuff just looks right compared to imitiations. ie Concord vs Concordski. Irony is that the cheaper imitiation often survives longer as so often better optimised (sic) for markets real requirement. Usually that means cheaper and less efficient ;-< ..."
Thus my Linux systems which work perfectly well but which are housed in plain black cases are imitations, cheap and inefficient?
Apple makes beautiful cases certainly but the hardware inside is bog standard Intel platform, the OS is UNIX and the Finder makes it difficult to move files around compared to Windows Explorer or KDE Konqueror.
You conclude that good case design makes a better computer? Will my machines work better if I move them into top shelf Lian Li cases?
Traditional SSL handshake takes an amount of time on the order of a single packet transit btwn browser and web site. This is perhaps around 100 mS (pinging theregister.com from western Canada).
False Start might cut that down to 70 mS - not exactly a revolution! Can *you* see when a page loads 30 mS faster? I cannot.
No!
No no no!
What works on a 24" monitor+keyboard+mouse does not work well on a 4" touchscreen monitor. That does NOT mean what works on a 4" touchscreen monitor should be the default for 24" monitor+keyboard+mouse.
Imposing a common UI on vastly disparate user interface *hardware* is a ridiculous, blind, dogmatic, pig-headed thing to do.
The backlash against KDE4 was not because it introduced radical and deeply questionable changes to the GUI.
The backlash was because KDE4 did NOT change the GUI metaphor very much at all - but it broke or removed almost all the customization options present in KDE3.5.x.
Even now, with KDE4.6, the only added really new features still are widgets and Vista bling.
KDE devs explain on the KDE site that a major rewrite was needed, I do not recall the details go look at the site. Some major behind the scenes subsystems were found by the time of KDE3.5.x to be insufficient to go forward. Well and good. Redesigning the guts of the UI did not require the bling blast and gutting of the UI's customization options.
This is a problem because (for example) I still cannot set the task bar to be a nice easy to read low key non-shiny light grey color with black font. I find the KDE4 black task bar hard to read - which genius dictated that such ergonomic details were not important to end-users?
But I like to manually place a window at the top of the screen or the left side of the screen. It's a radical concept but I use it to arrange windows sometimes.
I really do NOT need Win7 or KDE4 maximizing the window when I move it to the top. It is an insanely irritating default behaviour.
Is the top of screen idiom better than double click the title bar to maximize? Fact is it is not - because it mixes the move-window action with the resize action and is confusing.
First ting I do when I have to use KDE4 is editthe personal prefs and turn off all the "intelligence" of KDE4.
I really do not like the spin about UI from Gnome and KDE. Are they worried about who will 'win' the *NIX desktop?
Opening menus is a very difficult difficult activity?
Do I really need power tools or great diligence to navigate categories?
These things are not difficult.
Drop down menus survived from 1995 to 2011 because they work and are easy to use.
Nothing wrong with trying new UI ideas. However all the screen shot of Gnome3 shows me is a full screen list of big icons. What if I do not want all that crap on my desktop?
You can script AWS (esp. EC2) such that failed instances will trigger new instances being fired up, those new instances can be invoked at other AWS locations. So single point of failure charge made at AWS is not entirely fair.
And, well, you have all your infrastructure in a server room at your head office - that room or it's network connections can fail too. That must count as a single point of failure!
Frank Herbert will be remembered 200 years from now as one of the strongest writers and most subtle thinkers amongst 20th century sci-fi writers.
Which is exactly why none of his books can be made into good movies - his books make sense only when the reader reads between the lines. Movies do not excel at presenting the stuff that lies between the lines.
The bullet points listing the infringements describe a linked list and the operations one might want to perform on it as far as I can tell. I learned linked lists in 1991 in a Pascal programming class at Uni, they were hardly new then. Where is the new art in the patent?
Now if the patent holder had a way to search a linked list without using a key value, or to delete entries without using a key value then the patent holder would have something!
There are problems though.
Whether ones' high speed connection is in fact provisioned at the rated speed is difficult to measure.
In Canada the ISPs advertize speeds "up to" the advertized speed. The ISPs I've dealt with have a web app to measure the speed - it pumps data from a source in the head office to my computer using HTTP. This is fine.
Whether an ISP is secretly rate limiting certain kinds of traffic (can we say Bittorrent?) is more difficult to measure. Again the Bittorrent example - how does one measure a torrent swarm's speed in a manner acceptable in court, much less prove whether the ISP has a (possibly undocumented) traffic tier policy?
CA ISPs are not AFIAK regulated by laws wrt traffic prioritization or app level protocol traffic throttles. It is known that many of the larger ISPs want to rate limit certain kinds of traffic... it is not known if those ISPs comply with CRTC 'recommendations'.
No arg wrt Star Wars.
In the general category of dystopic futures, THX1138 was terrible!
Problems with THX1138:
- Where exactly did the drone guy learn to drive futuristic Lamborginis like a professional driver and handle handguns like a pro?
- In such a tightly controlled society, why is access to the underground roadways he escapes into not limited?
- At the end of the movies the drone guy escapes to 'outside', but we never see what is outside!
THX1138 lived up exactly to Lucas' low standards. It is 90-odd minutes of loose ends and unanswered questions.
THX1138 was a knock-off effort by Lucas merely playing on California nanny-state.
I was talking to an astronomer and a solar-system-specialist physicist a while back about a proposed spacecraft that would be sent out to edge of the solar system. Most of the conversation was about the limitations imposed by spacecraft's power budget.
I asked why they could not just bolt a, say, 50MW nuclear reactor onto the side of the space craft and have lots of power. They told me that at this time the regulatory frameworks in effect in the USA and internationally have made it such that it is very difficult for new spacecraft to be equipped with even nuclear-thermo power. Mainly because production of the radio-isotopes used in thermo generators is very tightly controlled, and there is not a lot in stock.
IMHO this is silly. If there was ever a good place to stick a nuclear reactor it is far away from here, in outer space.
Else in Lewis Page's basement bwahahaha!
I admit I only ever watched the show in the 80's or maybe very early 90's. The then Doctor was rather tall and had a big head of hair and was eccentric - very much a Brit. it was a fun & funny show.
That guy in the cowboy hat reminds me of Micky Knox, for God's sake!
Yes indeed, I do agree! I guess my beard is not as venerable as yours must be though ;-)
The claim that programmers are only now learning multi-threaded programming (and that it is so terribly difficult) is laughable.
I wrote my first threaded program in 1998 using solely M$DN for reference, produced a completely stable and problem free Win32 service app that ran two work threads and a control thread on a dual socket Pentium Pro box. It took me 1.5 working weeks to learn how to write a threaded app.
This stuff is not rocket science, it just requires attention to a few more details.