Erm...12?
Seriously...who's abducted an episode?
829 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2009
...is the the EVIL (electronic viewfinder, interchangeable lens) tag REALLY appropriate for a camera that doesn't come with, I don't know, an actual viewfinder? Seriously, though, like, it seems, a lot of other commenters, the lack of one is what puts me off a lot of these cameras. I've tried using LCD screens on cameras for framing shots and really, REALLY can't abide it, especially in sunlight.
But his daughter declined the burger (stating that she was full and that it was too hot) and the daughter of the family friend who died of vCJD wasn't involved in the incident at all. See http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article2641749.ece. It's always a very good idea to have a clue BEFORE you start jumping down other peoples' throats.
is that the Tab's "Samsung" branding is removed from the photograph. Had that been left on, it would have demonstrated (as per the review shot on the left of the article) that the default view for the Tab is landscape. So, Apple have had to:
1. Mislead the court about the size and aspect ratio of the Tab
2. Mislead the court about the user interface of the Tab (and other Honeycomb devices)
3. Mislead the court about the default orientation and thus expected use of the device
...and after all that, the Reg still has the brass neck to post creepy spin like "More likely, however, is that Apple presented the image to show the similarities beyond the physical shape..." .
It bears repeating that Apple did not invent tablet computers. Nor did they invent tablet computers that display a grid of icons on the screen (hint: Google (I had to say it...) Motion Computing and many others). They didn't invent touchscreens, nor yet did they invent capacitative touchscreens. I don't object to their defending their legitimate IP. This is not that. This is an abuse of the legal process, and in light of this, blatantly dishonest abuse at that.
...by the balanced and measured coverage on problems with US defence projects until I checked the byline; one assumes that problems with Lewis's oxygen supply have caused him to forget El Reg's office address/email address/fax number...? That's what you get for buying that overpriced American tat... *
*Note to US-ians; trolling LP, not you, OK?
Seriously, this is absolutely bloody dire news and I can only assume that this inane Slater woman doesn't actually like sport (or certainly F1) that much. "Delighted" to lose half the rights? The stupid, smug, self-satisfied cow. "delivered significant savings"? Yes, by screwing the audience.
"It's a sign of how uncompetitive and undesirable Nokia's high-end offerings have become that the company practically has to give them away"
I think it's more a sign that no-one in their right mind is going to buy into a platform that Nokia are actively shitcanning. We have a fair few Nokia E-series smartphones in service and, peace be to our AC above, firstly, you haven't needed to download Mail for Exchange for some years now, since all the current E-class phones have had ActiveSync built-in, and secondly, it works well. I would probably buy more, except that I know there will be, effectively, no further development of the platform; the developers have gone, so there are unlikely to even be any bugfixes for the phones they're still selling. That doesn't mean that the phones are uncompetitive or undesirable (E7 and N8 are very nice), just that I can't feel comfortable buying a device that's effectively completely unsupported.
...right or left handed touchpads; why not? The touchpads are usually built into the plastic keyboard surround; it's not as though you'd have to move other stuff around to fit, or as if the actual part would be expensive. I've seen figures of about 1 in 10 being left handed, and I'm sure they buy laptops too. There's left-handed guitars, watches, scissors etc. Maybe shops wouldn't keep large stocks of southpaw laptops, but you could easily have them as a special order item.
So they're going to proceed on the assumption that everything's hunky-dory and not even consider delaying the takeover unless and until the rozzers (because they've been SO reliable) decide that something untoward has happened. The bang you just heard was a stable door being determinedly and firmly closed after a finding that the horse had indeed bolted.
...the actions of NotW, NI and that slag Brooks hampered the police investigation and allowed Bellfield to escape detection, then the truly horrific aspect is "Former bouncer Bellfield was previously convicted of murdering two other young women, Marsha McDonnell and Amelie Delagrange: both crimes happened in the two years after Dowler's murder.". Their actions may not just have interfered in the capture of a murderer, but freed that murderer to go on and kill two more people. As others have commented, people need to be jailed for this, and not just the lowly peons; Brooks and others of her ilk MUST have known what was being done, and they should be jailed also.
..."Oracle wants to proceed to trial regardless of any further reexamination of the claims."; that seems to be saying something to the effect of "We want you to find Google guilty of violations of patents that may in fact not actually exist...". I can imagine the reaction of the average judge to that...
...given that Truecrypt and many commercial products do whole disk encryption; the disk is encrypted, and unscrambled when the user either provides the password or some form of token (biometric, smartcard, whatever). It's policy here now that all laptops are encrypted before issue, so yes, everything on the laptop *is* encrypted and then decrypted before being worked on. Whatever you may believe.
Contrast the following statements:
"All the laptops were password protected and our policy is to manually delete the data from laptops after the records have been processed."
and
"The machine was one of 20 lost from a storeroom at London Health Programmes - a research body based at NHS North Central London"
So the machine was obviously inactive and stored. If the policy is to delete the data after processing, how the holy fuck could it have 8.6m records on it? Answer: their response is bullshit; said policy's an arse-covering piece of paper that no-one actually reads, let alone enforces. Dammit, how hard is it to DBAN a laptop when it comes back in and reimage it before reuse?
...have Apple actually agreed this with them, or are they simply telling them "this is what we're doing, suck it up or take your ball home"? If the latter, isn't this close to being the sort of flat-rate market destroying hell that your colleague Orlowski's banged on about previously?
"disk really does face becoming the new tape over the next five, ten and twenty years"
What, the medium that everyone keeps saying is dead, but when you scratch the surface is still doing the same job it always was? Seriously, no. Have a look at your won reportage to see how dead tape is:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/04/15/google_streamline_lto/
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/03/18/tape_in_the_cloud/
...oh dearie, dearie me; things ARE looking a bit grim, aren't they? Thing is, it's a decent cast (the non-chef parts, at any rate), so is this just a case of a very bad trailer for a half-decent film, or is it truly as bad as the trailer suggests...either way, I can't see a BAFTA in Gordo's future anytime soon...