
Re: Are these clever people so thick?
Indeed if you have to be fully engaged and ready to take over at a moments notice you may aswell be driving it!
1693 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2009
[quote]The document runs to 218 pages, with 194 clauses, 18 schedules and 112 pages of explanatory notes, and - as has been pointed out by many observers, parts of the text - like this eye-crossing sentence: “Terms used in Chapter 2 and in the GDPR have the same meaning in Chapter 2 as they have in the GDPR” - are fairly Kafka-esque.[/quote]
If a 116 page document needs 112 page to explain it, it is not fit for purpose and needs to be binned and started again from scratch!
We need laws to be clear and easy to understand not so complicated. The more complex it become the more clauses it needs to fill in the holes those complexities makes!
Also if this is replacing GDPR it should state those terms and not quote a something it is replacing. What happens when Euro rewords GDPR, is the old or the new version?
[quote]While still evaluating the NTSB report, the electric car-maker added that “We will also continue to be extremely clear with current and potential customers that Autopilot is not a fully self-driving technology and drivers need to remain attentive at all times”. ®[/quote]
Maybe they could start by not calling it an Autopilot and call it something that would make it clear it is something to help you drive not do it for you while you ignore the road!
[quote]Between now and the end of the year, a second critical battle between the spy agencies and Congress is going to play out as the NSA and FBI desperately try to retain the ability to spy illegally on American citizens, and lawmakers assess how far they should push back and limit those actions.[/quote]
I would say that some terrorist event is going to happen right before a vote on this?
[quote]The three companies say that, in a controlled Ericsson lab, the Qualcomm Snapdragon X20 chipset was able to use Verizon spectrum to access 12 simultaneous LTE streams and pull data at a gigabit rate through licensed commercial bands.[quote]
So just increase the network by 11 times and you are good to go? hahahaha!
[quote]The UK has also experimented with allowing fines for fare dodging and traffic penalties to be done online. In those cases, defendants can log into the system, see the penalty, and then decide whether to accept it and pay it, or dispute it. ®[/quote]
Going down the american path of pleading guilt and paying the fine due to if you dispute it the fine is massively bigger?
Smart light bulb is anything but smart. If you rarely want a smart light then the better solution would be to make the light fitting. The bulb would then be simpler to make and should be cheaper.
You could also connect the all you lights together using the wiring you already have to do smart things.
[quote]The case is related to Project Waltz, implemented in 2009 to help Big Blue achieve its 2010 targets for earnings per share and slash costs, resulting in 25 per cent of UK staff booted off the final salary pension scheme.[/quote]
Seem rather unfair to that 25% that got booted out, it should have been all or none to be 100% fair.
While not good practice sending the cryptogram in cleartext would not be a problem if it only used once.
I am surprised you can reuse the cryptogram I assume it gets verified by the Applepay server each time it is used, so surely a second use would be rejected. Which brings to mind how long is the cryptogram valid for?
Reminds me when the company I worked for merged with another. Over the course of a couple of years all the sites belonging to my company closed, none of the site of the other company did.
I wonder who owned the sites that are being closed this round belonged to before the "merger".
Hardly a surprise it was in the manifesto,
The key word is offered as it is voluntary to take on when offered.
https://www.lovemoney.com/news/64770/smart-meter-voluntary-conservative-tory-manifesto
http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/advice/do-i-have-to-accept-a-smart-meter#can-i-decide-what-data-is-shared
Indeed the price rise as stated is not a like for like products, like the analyst said:
"PC ASPs have been on the rise since Q3 2016," said Marie-Christine Pigott, senior analyst at Context. "The increase has been driven by currency fluctuations, price increases by vendors to offset the effects of higher component costs, and also by a shift to higher-value products such as gaming systems in the consumer segment and powerful, high-end notebooks in the commercial sector."
So not so much as ripoff but selling better stuff at a higher price as in the words of El Reg:
"El Reg hasn't noticed prices of finished products available on the High Street or online rising by that amount, but hey, that's what the numbers stated."
Except that is not what the numbers stated!
[quote]Force the companies providing the encryption to introduce backdoors.[/quote]
A backdoor in encryption is an open door making encryption less than worthless. Look at how NSA failed to keep their tools locked up.
Mandating encryption backdoors is like making all knives sold (including cutlery and letter openers) to be sold blunt with a large ball welded on the end, with a large fine or jail time for anyone who sharpens or removes the ball.