Re: Better.com
Go some where else, any where else!!
1505 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2009
<quote> Limited companies can't do that because they have a statutory duty to maximise shareholder return - in dividends and the share price.<quote>
The law does not say that.
This is the law, from the Companies Act 2006:
172: Duty to promote the success of the company
(1)A director of a company must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to–
(a)the likely consequences of any decision in the long term,
(b)the interests of the company's employees,
(c)the need to foster the company's business relationships with suppliers, customers and others,
(d)the impact of the company's operations on the community and the environment,
(e)the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct, and
(f)the need to act fairly as between members of the company.
(2)Where or to the extent that the purposes of the company consist of or include purposes other than the benefit of its members, subsection (1) has effect as if the reference to promoting the success of the company for the benefit of its members were to achieving those purposes.
(3)The duty imposed by this section has effect subject to any enactment or rule of law requiring directors, in certain circumstances, to consider or act in the interests of creditors of the company.
So, where does it say that profit maximisation has to be the object of the company? Quite clearly it doesn't.
Sure, 'success of the company for the benefit of its members' clearly implies a duty to generate profit, or at least a positive cash flow, but maximise it? No way! This is at best a constrained requirement, as is clear from sub-paragraphs a to f.
So what is abundantly clear is that in UK law there is:
a) No duty to maximise profit
b) No duty to minimise tax bills
c) A duty to exercise judgement.
Tesla Model S has two sets of batteries one for the system and the other to run the motors. If you do not use the car for a while even if you leave it plugged in the system battery will go flat and you can not operate the car without dismantle part of it to recharge that battery.
James May's Tesla Model S did fail with it a few months ago https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsKwMryKqRE
They had a go at them when they tried to outland genuine satire, is this another go at shutting them up?
A NSFW video (swearing)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNIYL5x1oy0
As for:
<quote>The other win came with a law that requires Facebook and Google to pay local news publishers for the right to link to their content (Indonesia's government last week floated laws based on Australia's). Both Facebook and Google protested, vociferously, that the proposal was unworkable before eventually backing it.</quote>
I think from this video it was not so much a win (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqj2z3QaRyU) NSFW as sucking up for News Corps or Rupert Murdoch.
UK, Europe and USA are looking into this, last time I checked while the UK have left the EU they are still part of the same continent*.
Unless you means China is the third one in which case putting that in the article would have been useful.
*Moving the UK to a new continental plate would be tricky, but doing it while keeping the island of Ireland in one piece and keeping the Republic of Ireland on the European continental shelf would make that boarder rather tectonically active.
You forgot to say your adding in a Tobacco company too!!
Fun reading their website:
<quote>
Using science to increase understanding
World-class science
Science and innovation are at the heart of our transformational journey as we continue to build A Better Tomorrow™ by reducing the health impact of our business.
</quote>
Depression and suicide do not follow logic!!
Happy people with everything to live for do fall into depression and try to commit suicide. Having something to live for is not a bar to depression and suicide.
You could say that someone with a lot to live for is someone who can fall into depression as they have a lot they can worry about!
From a logic point of view if something makes "everyone happy" it got to be good? Which is where logic and language fails.
The idea that everyone could agree anything is very unlikely, so unlikely that it can be called impossible.
Redesign, reuse , repurpose, recycle.
Redesign so the others uses are easier to do and ease of recycling.
Reuse which if true they are being reused in static installations then that is great.
Then once the capacity is to low recycle then recycle the materials and make new ones and the impact while none zero is reduced.
The NHS does not even share your data with itself.
I had to go to A&E to treat a big blister, they took some blood to be tested, also swabbed the wound. No idea what the results where as they have not shared that data with my doctors practice. So before they talk about sharing data with some random researchers maybe get the parts of the "National" heath service to talk to each other.
Sure 30% is a lot but when the game cost nothing and all the money comes from in-game purchases and these are not done via Apples store their cut is zero. Apple does nothing for free and why should it?
Sorry EPIC you knew the rules if you do not like them do not stop using the Apple store.
Yes we keep on being told that a company must maximise profits nothing about being nice about doing it.
Facebook's behaviour is the result of this, which just show how bad the idea that a companies only exist to maximise profit is.