Shocking summary!
"It’s expensive, but I don’t care"
You should bloody care, and you should factor that against both your scoring and what your getting for your cash.
Rubbish!
290 publicly visible posts • joined 7 May 2009
is still rubbish *despite* not having true multi-tasking. And what about the symbian comparable; the nokia n97? Doesn't that have rubbish battery life as well?
The thing sucking up the battery is the 3g and wireless, and it's the same with all smart phones.
Differences in phone OS arn't really going to make a difference. And if they do, Orlownski certainly didn't bother to put any numbers up to support his argument.
Within the context of the sentance, i think most people would have understood that 'the internet' would mean mobile internet enabled on your phone. But point taken.
That aside, here are Apples battery life claims: http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html
Internet use:
Up to 5 hours on 3G
Up to 9 hours on Wi-Fi
I just can't see how your claims are possible. My experiance and the experiance of my pals is that the iphone, 3gs or not lasts about a day if you have mobile internet enabled.
"If you're someone who regularly drains two (or more) batteries on a phone before you can get to a charger then you probably want something a bit more specialised than the iPhone."
The iphone battery lasts less than a day with the internet on (as do most of the android handsets, to be fair). To have a working phone for a couple of days i don't think is a particularly 'specialist' requirement, and swapping a battery at the start of the second day is not a bad or inelegant solution.
The fact that 4 of these 'essential' accessories are to do with the battery life i'd say it was a concern, no?
The first ION, while everybody seemed to bang on about it; never really took off in the netbook space because of power draw (WARNING! this is only my hunch, i never owned or tested any hardware with ION inside).
Hopefully the power draw will be better this time around, but i still don't really understand the point of putting in a fully fledged graphics card into a device which will probably only be used to look at email and youtube vids.
The personally think it's all about the keyboard.
The netbook is good because it fits in your bag and when you need to do some proper computing, you got the keyboard there to do it with.
Anything else you can do on your android/iphone/blackberry/n900
the ipad you can't carry on your person, so you gotta put it in your bag, why not just take a netbook instead?
"It's a piss poor practice that was stopped years ago."
perhaps you should look at the offline feature of google mail, google calendar and google documents, all using an "entire" database for offline use.
The idea is that you only download the database (or even just the schema) once, then update it intermittently.
Firefox and Chrome (i think) already have sqlite baked into them to deal with history, settings and bookmarks. This is Google Gears project sneaking into the latest HTML spec through the back door.
This is probably a good thing in the context that most of your future browsing will be done on your mobile which might not always have a data connection.
It's Expensive compared to other products that do the same thing.
Napster does it for £5/month, and it has an iphone client.
Sky Songs is £6.49/month AND you can download 10 songs a month for free.
Your right, spotify is more expensive than stealing, but it's also more expensive than most of it's rivals.
Like i said earlier, it's the mobile clients that make the difference.
It's the mobile clients that make the difference between Spotify and all the other all-you-can-eat services, some (most?) of which are cheaper than Spotify but don't seem to get the same amount of attention.
Better late than never for Symbian phones. At least these users will be able to listen to spotify and do other stuff with their phones, unlike the Iphone lot (thanks to a bizarre decision to not allow multitasking on for 3rd party apps)
I always see comments on here asking why don't we see more ION products. Well this is the reason: look at the bars, the EEE 100HA beats it in Battery Life and is on par with this in every else and costs £80-100 less, all because they packed it with the stupid ION so people (idiots in my opinion) can watch HD content on a really small screen. completely pointless IMO
I happen to work in the Business rates Dept of a certain soho square based company of chartered surveyors.
Let me assure you that an extra £100 pounds over the 5 year business rates period is not going to break anyone's bank.
I wanted to go into more detail about the costs of masts, but the way they price up the floor space makes it hard to evaluate exactly how much money a mast on a commercial premise actually costs.
But take a rate of £2,500 (roughly the going rate for a 'communication station' in london). £100 isn't even a 10% hike.
The new rates have gone up by 10% or more for most of these stations (in london) anyway. So this new supplement is just an extra kick in the bollocks, albeit a very small one
"The GMA-500 does not support Atom"
Look at the specs of:
Sony's VAIO P series,
Fujitsu's Lifebook U820,
ASUStek's Eee PC 1101HA,
Dell's Inspiron Mini 10 and Inspiron Mini 12,
Acer's Aspire One 751,[25] ,
ASUStek's EeePC T91 tablet
...For examples of an Atom paired with GMA 500
"GMA 950 consumes about 22w"
I hope it doesn't, i don't have the specs to hand but that doesn't sound right at all, can anyone verify?
netbook spec for slightly higher than netbook pricing.
45W seems a bit steep as well, hopefully 35W of that is in the monitor.
Finally the GMA-950 seems like an odd choice. Why not put in the GMA-500 which can do codec stuff in hardware so at the very least a user can watch HD content without it stuttering? It's not like you have to worry about battery life.
Touch screen is nice i suppose, looks decent enough as well.
IMO not worth the 80% score