You too can have...
.... stuttering, under powered graphics.
261 publicly visible posts • joined 2 May 2007
You are so right.
Look at the photos over at the archos website and see that it's all about the OS and the hardware, the end user can go to hell. Who (at MS) cares about the user experience so long as it runs Windows 7?
For MS it's all about the Brand and the juggernaut of sales, keep the user swamped and he won't be able to move away, while others are concentrating on the user experience: Treat the user with respect and he'll be faithful.
Apple, Nokia and Palm are all coming to realise that if you get the user experience right, then the users will stay faithful. MS are still trying to use beatings and negative reinforcement to demand brand loyalty.
So, you know what MS should do? (I know I will get flamed for this, but it would work). They should draw a line under Windows 7 and say, after that we will have a brand new operating system. It will not be backwards compatible, though it will work on the same hardware. It will be new from the very bare bones upwards, it will not be based on any previous version of windows, and it will not be called windows.
Now, I know all you windows fans will be snigger at how stupid that sounds, but is it really? Is it any worse than someone who decides to switch from WIndows to Linux? Or windows to Mac OS X?
You are all crying out about how there will be no support for you favourite this that or the next app, but the developers will love it, they get to re-factor all their products, which they've been secretly wanting to do for years. Anyone who has ever made Mac software has already done that once, and it pays.
You were so very close when you said:
>Imagine a Slate with USB, BT2.1 (with full A2DP) and Infrared, a MiniDisplayPort, AND an HDMI
>port. Connect it to your TV, to play some games, connect handsets (iPhones or Apple controllers
>wirelessly or over BT for multilayer). the Slate could be the new AppleTV, or it could fit in the
>middle as a bridge device.
All those ports, well the physical ones at least, will be available - but via the dock connector.
The thing is, that fruity tech is not 2 -3 years behind, but is actually delivering what people want.
Nokia et al think that adding more and more tech will drive sales, and to some extent it does, but then people have actually ended up paying for the tech, and not getting much in the way of usability. Whereas fruity tech deliver usability in abundance - in fact the user experience gets highest priority, ahead of having the latest widget, camera or photon cannon. People like HTC, Nokia and Microsoft should start investing in usability and let THAT dictate the technology and not the other way around.
"...gives you the benefit of rapid start up, very low operating noise and a PC that is amazingly responsive."
Any Apple Mac from the past 5 years will do that too.
Putting a faster hard drive in a PC to make it go faster is not the correct answer. It's Windows and the mandatory CPU Gobbling anti-malware that makes your PC go slow.
Buy a mac.
Try this simple test.
Go into any CarphoneWarehouse or O2 store and ask to buy an iPhone 3GS on PAYG.
They will tell you that it is currently out of stock and it may be several weeks before they get stock - or some similar statement, they'll also tell you that they DO have it in stcok on Contract SIMS.
Now, do you know what the difference is between a PAYG sim and a Contract SIM? Nothing.
It's the same phone, the same box, the only difference is the box they tick for activation.
O2 and CPW simply do no wish to sell the phone on PAYG, therefore they must be making more money from Contract than from PAYG phones. So much more, that they would rather loose the £440 sale than sell the phone to a PAYG customer, and then keep the phone in stock until a contract customer comes along.
I use windows 7 a lot, I have to for my job.
I've used Windows in all it's versions since Win386, through WfW, W95, XP and so on.
I have also used Mac OS X since Tiger (10.3).
What strikes me is the difference in attitude towards the end user from both Apple and MS.
I just get that feeling that the MS developers put code first, and user experience last, whereas with Apple, the user experience is EVERYTHING it's even written into (for example) the iPhone SDK agreement.
I was using windows 7 the other day and was trying to do something simple like copy a file off of my memory stick onto the desktop. The explorer window was just cluttered, poorly laid out and confusing - even for an experienced computer user like me.
The Apple finder isn't perfect - but it is leap years ahead of it's rival when it comes to user friendliness.
Anyway, each to their own.
Bye for now.
This is a rant, not journalism.
I really detest such negativity in so called journalism.
If you can't present something in a neutral and balanced way then just shut up.
You may well be correct that Opera is not being relevant, so you should present the facts, and your opinion, but to moan like child is just unprofessional.
I wish El Reg would let us filter on author.
So, let have a wee look at your comment.
Don't you think there is something you are missing?
Like the fact that Apple actually make great, usable products?
You obviously got a touch of green fever, because /your/ chosen technology supplier doesn't make any decent products. All you have left is to slag off a company that does, and people that appreciate them.
We didn't need the internet, until we had it.
It's not a matter of need, it's a matter of progress and availability will fuel demand, providing it is priced appropriately.
In addittion, BT Can't afford NOT to do it, since someone else will, if they don't. It wouldn't cost Virgin much to extend their fibre to the home from the street cabinets.
Thank goodness - don't you just hate it when people do an 'iPhone' version of their website and then direct you there based on your User Agent string.
The iPhone has the best web browser on a mobile device bar none, it works GREAT with full size web sites and we don't need a smaller, special version just for iPhone.
Brill, I say - good on you google, and about time too!
Staurt has it dead right.
The withdrawal from Macworld is about timing and control.
The abscence of Steve Job - well thats anyone's guess but it's totally up to him!
We really don't know exactly how much the current product line up is down to him, and how much is down to the team, of which he is just one part. These are interesting times and it will be good to watch and see what pans out in the next year or so.
Sorry what? Have I missed something here?
I never trustd the tinfoils hats - because as far as I can see they have no active component, and won't work as a faraday cage since they are not grounded, but this new device should be ok, after all it's got a chip in it.
Mine is the one with the wire wool lining.
They said I was 'odd' and put me in the 'odd box' when I said you'd be able to do browsing on your games console.
They told me I was odd, when I said you'd get in-game advertising.
They told me I was odd when I said search engines would sell your searches to advertisers.
They told me I was odd when I said you'd search, browse, shop and play games on the same console, and that the adverts you get when your online would be targetted directly AT YOU.
They told me I was odd, but in reality I was just telling you what was coming. It came. In fact, its so passè now. (See my article in mid nineties in Develop magazine).
Now listen. I'm telling you what's coming - now don't call me odd, just listen.
Windows is moribund. Got it? I'm not odd. I just know how to ignore the hype and look at the facts.
Only a freaking idiot would hard code a variable tax rate ino software.
The moral of the story is - get rid of any software package that has done this - who know what else the developers didn't understand about accounting.
For 99% of retailers it will be a matter of setting a new tax code, and saying use the new one from midnight on Sunday. For any that can't do that, sack the fecking accounts software supplier!
-LHM