Re: Reform could simply say...
They could and probably will. But you've heard the story of the scorpion and the frog.
1412 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Feb 2009
They're pushing it so that they don't have to implement the age check stuff while, at the same time, being able to grab the ages of all of their users for profile accuracy and better ad targetting. If the device reports an age later found to be incorrect then they have plausible deniability if any court case comes their way. They are evil.
My Tapo cameras are blocked from the internet at the firewall. My Frigate installation grabs the rtsp streams and records them, alerts me to intrusions by people, cats, dogs, birds etc. They needed net access for setup but after that just block them. I did use Raspberry Pi cameras initially but they didn't prove robust enough to handle being outside in all weathers.
“It’s a beautiful thing, the Destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn’t only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word, which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take ‘good,’ for instance. If you have a word like ‘good,’ what need is there for a word like ‘bad’? ‘Ungood’ will do just as well – better, because it’s an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of ‘good,’ what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like ‘excellent’ and ‘splendid’ and all the rest of them? ‘Plusgood’ covers the meaning or ‘doubleplusgood’ if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already, but in the final version of Newspeak there’ll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words – in reality, only one word. Don’t you see the beauty of that, Winston? It was B.B.’s idea originally, of course,”- Orwell