Re: Lack of imagination
I thought the plan was stop kids from accessing the internet.
354 publicly visible posts • joined 16 Feb 2009
In forlorn hopes of trying to understand what, if anything, this AI is good for, I've been watching some videos. The other day I came across a killer. Someone got an AI agent on his PC to use the windows calc app to add 2 and 2, copy the result, and then paste it into notepad. I wish I was making that up, but I'm not.
"Any computer that you bought five years ago will still do the job fine now,", except that MS Win 10 is at end of life, and upgrading to Win 11 may require a new processor, and that will almost certainly mean a new computer. Yes of course there is Linux, but that might not be an option for many.
The trouble is, we don't always see them coming. In June 2020, asteroid 2020 LD was discovered, BUT only after about 36 HOURS AFTER it's closest approach, which was in the region 0.8 lunar distances, and at an estimated diameter of 80-110m, it was big enough to destroy a city if it had hit one.
Except that we already know how to do that at the RF level. What I'm thinking of is that Ai can reduce the data that needs to be sent by sending a vectors that are generated when it initially analysis an input. If the sender and receiver are using the same LLM, then the sender only need to send the token that represent a bit of input, not the whole thing.
I believe it was the 1930/40s film actress Hedy Lamarr who played a pivotal role in her other career as inventor in laying the foundations for multiplexing that allows for more efficient use of the radio spectrum. The point being that you don't need to update the RF hardware to make it better, you just need to us it more effectively, and I can certainly see a case for AI doing that.
You list lots of reasons why trial by jury is bad, all of which I agree with, but then you follow that with "jury trial is undoubtedly a good thing". Make your mind up.
My view on trial by jury is quite clear, twelve untrained, unqualified, inexperience, potentially unwilling, and definitely unaccountable conscripts are not fit to make potentially life changing decisions. Even a one year suspended sentence can affect future job prospects and the cost of insurance. Most of the world does not use juries, it's only Britain, and some of it's former colonies that use this system of medieval justice.
A simple search from last week*,
"5 letter word ending in olm"
M$ copilot responded with
"Here are some five-letter words ending in "olm":
GLOOM
GOLEM
LOOMY
These words can be useful for word games like Scrabble or Wordle."
Err, I'm fairly sure none of those words end in olm. (*BTW, I was absolutely definitely not cheating, honest).
Why aren't the IT companies being fined for imposing pointless upgrades on us that only happen because they want to make more £s/€s/$s by forcing us to "upgrade" to something that's more or less the same as the old, but just a little bit more annoying. They've fined Apple for it's abuse of power regarding it's app store, they should also be fining M$ for it's abuse of power.
To be able to compare the facial image with the id, the system needs to already have a copy of the id image. It doesn't matter whether the airport scanner saves it recorded image or not, the authorities already have a copy of your face. They will also have all the info the require to track your journey through the airline ticketing system and banks used to processes the transaction used when purchasing the ticket. All the tech does is reduce staffing costs, and arguably improve accuracy, as the robots won't have a hangovers at the start of the day.
I know what you mean, my favourite "was" @WorldBollard. An account dedicated to bollards protecting the world from bad drivers. I say "was", becuase I was recently banned from twitter for reasons that remain obscure. I can't say I mind, I'm glad to be out of the cespit that accounts for 99% of the content that is now current on the site.
Belgium has a stable electrical supply, hence the backup generators will usually only be fired up for a few hours every year for testing, so the CO2 implications are negligible. Batteries would be more useful elsewhere, for instance in storing excess renewable power for use on the national grid.
Courtesy of an inspirational teacher at my very bog standard comprehensive school I had already learnt how to program by the time I got my ZX81, but that computer gave me the space to try things out, and 40+ years later, I'm still hacking away with the kids writing stuff that is a million miles away from that start. Without doubt Clive Sinclair (and his team) gave me a massive boost towards what ended up being my career. RIP Sir Clive.
As demand for fossil fuels falls the governemt will need to replace the tax income from old tech cars with a new tax on electric vehicles. I'm thinking that it will be some software that reports your daily milage back to a central computer, and which then taxes you for each mile that you drive. Obviously it will charge more for driving into cities.
If they can fix Hubble's optics, then I can't see any reason whty they can't attach a small rocket motor to force it's re-entry. It would be easy enough to ensure that it then comes down over an ocean. As to creating more space junk - satellites have been known to collide, so I would suggest getting it out of orbit when it's of no furthure use should be a priority.
Hubble has far exceeded it original design remit. It has provided so much data that they will still be analysing it long after it stops working. My only hope is that when the end is really nigh, they point it back home, and let it burn up in the atmosphere so that it doesn't add to the ever growing "pile" of space junk
I suspect that it probably uses some solid state accellerometers and rate gyroscopes, much like the ones in my mobile phone. Its a simple enough job to integrate their outputs to get a measure of distance travelled in the X,Y & Z directions. Since the flights are so short, the cumaliative measurement errors will be tiny.
An "expert" on the radio (*) reckons we need to build 1 nuclear power plant, or a 2500 turbine wind farm, every day for the next 30 years to replace all of the fossil fuelled power stations in the world by 2050. He didn't say what the generating capacity of these units was, so I decided to do my own estimate based on a 800MW nuclear plant (like Hinckely Point B), or a 80x10MW turbines wind farm, and I came up with a more optimistic estimate of one of these every 4 days. My estimate based on current electricity demands and does not take into account the increased demand of electric cars and of replacing gas central heating systems.
So in short, I agree, we're fucked.
(* The radio show is a BBC world service programme How soon can we go carbon zero? )