That's all very nice
But the public don't read El Reg - if you've been smacking your gob over this go join you local No2ID branch, hassle the public on a few flyering sessions and make sure next time it's not 60 million records lost.
292 publicly visible posts • joined 1 May 2007
"Given that you were providing internet access to what are admittedly terrorist publications, it is difficult to see what else was intended other than the encouragement etc of terrorism"
He wasn't "providing internet access to", and as to "what else was intended" how about comment (as in 'fair use') ?
Is the judge going to go after Google as well now then ?
The difference between AIR and ActiveX, is that ActiveX silently installs and runs from a web page.
AIR applications have a bit fat 'I'm about to install something' window.
Yeah, users will click 'OK' on anything, but that gets back to the point that for security, AIR is just like your common-or-garden .exe download.
"Surely the US Military has no powers to stop people taking photographs from space"
Actually, you should google 'space denial' and then head over to http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/HJ20Aa02.html:
"George W Bush signed an executive order creating a new National Space Policy on Wednesday. The most crucial feature of this policy is that it "rejects future arms-control agreements that might limit US flexibility in space and asserts a right to deny access to space to anyone 'hostile to US interests'." "
"it is inaccurate to say that it will not be possible to reverse-engineer the data stored in order to obtain the original fingerprint"
Look at the definition of a hash. It contains less information than the data that was hashed (i.e. the fingerprint) so it's impossible to reconstruct the data from the hash.
"a criminal would need both physical access to the card and the knowledge of the permanent password"
No, he wouldn't need anything like that level of access.
He'd just proxy all the authorisation instructions backwards and forwards, *then* raid your account.
Classic man-in-the-middle.
So it wont have some things that are on 'listen again', because of a stupid non-reason.
And it's being given out to cable TV people after the Windows release, who already have time-shifting / PVR (Virgin's 'V+' service) functions that are far better than the system the BBC is foisting (for instance, iPlayer can only hold on to a program for a week, and only a tiny amount of series content will be on it. V+ allows unlimited keeping of any content, series or not, and works on any channel too).
And then they'll do a Mac version, followed by Freeview (just in time for everyone to have got one type of Freeview box for the digital switchover, they'll need to get an upgraded box for BBC iPlayer support).
Apparently the hold up is 'third parties outside of the BBC's control', which I take to mean the DRM and peer-to-peer aspects, both of which are proprietary and Windows only at the mo.
Still, at least there are regular reviews, so we can make sure the content we pay for is accessible to us correctly.