Posts by Frank Fisher 100 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Dec 2008
Given that we hid in fear from a "pandemic" that was certainly less dangerous than the flu and with an average age of death greater than the average age of death, perhaps AIs are already screwing with governments via underhand manipulation or skewed presentation of data? We saw from the whatsapp leak that these clowns could not convert a decimal to a percentage, do we think they could spot warped data coming in? I doubt it.
I first wrote about this in 1995. They were still scraping afterbirth off the WWW when a French European Commissioner put forward a proposal to mandate use of an offline ID to verify online identity - that never even made it to the european parliament, but it Keeps Coming Back. It is clearly a global objective, and the biometric-linked identifier many of you now carry - also known as a covid pass - will likely form the basis of a global ID system indelibly associated with your very own genomic signature
Yeah yeah, tinfoil hat etc. Laugh at someone who's been right for thirty years, it really makes you look clued up. Just wait and see.
The global state corporate superstate needs access to ever word you say, in order to monitor, uncover and brainwash you. They can't keep this phony baloney hysteria going without that level of control; so no laws, no principles, no regulation, no ethic or IT best practice will keep their goons at bay.
You are the product. You all know this. Today you are the data product. Tomorrow you will be Soylent Green. You really do all know this.
Why on earth are we unable to have business as normal now? What is going on? We have had a minor infectious disease that has taken us back to the devastating plague year death rates of.... 2003. Smack on the thirty year average. Yet that blip in deaths - of the very old - is being used as a rationale for turning the world upside down. Why?
qui bono?
Guiliani has a thousand affidavits - sworn testimony. Most of these have never even been looked at by a court. I suggest the Navvaro report is the best place to start reading up on the reality of evidence. https://navarroreport.com/
BTW, try googling for the navarro report, and then try a duckduckgo search. It may teach you something.
That's a plain lie. I have watched a press conference video of Trump denouncing white supremacism immediately after Charlottesville and the room full of journalists reporting that he supported it. The back and forth during the press conference was a furious screeching match with journalists demanding condemnation, Trump giving it, and in the next breath journalists screeching that he had not. It was insane.
Here, see for yourself - full conference - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ovkMSJ6svc
And here is the moment that the press decided to lie about from that day to this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ovkMSJ6svc&t=1165s
Of course this is censorship, political censorship, and built on a web of lies and distortions. Why shouldn't' people be allowed to say the US election was flakey - there are dozens of statistical red flags and hundreds of sworn statements detailing abuses. Why shouldn't people be allowed to demonstrate against such an abuse of the democratic process? Why shouldn't they be angry? And yet the media nd tech decries the anger, decries the genuine fear too. But will gagging all these people resolve the issue? No, more likely that instead of school shootings the US will now see a rash of big tech and media shootings. Censorship merely enrages it does not remove.
And the uniform applause from the media is quite slickening and self-interested. No one points up the inconsistencies. Amazon is furious about 98 nasty posts, but amazon literally sells Mein Kampf and the Protocols of the Elders of Zion
This is the world's darkest day since 1945, and nine tenths of people seem to be delighted.
There is no pandemic. This is a minor bug. all the media hysteria in the world does not change that. The death toll *from* coronavirus as opposed to *with* coronavirus is well below what we might expect in a highish flu year. 50k died in the uk from flu in 2017/18. we had no panic.
This is the world's biggest over-reaction. And I am surprised the Reg can place such faith in a rushed out vaccine for this coronavirus when there is not one effective vaccine for any other coronavirus.
Nothing that is happening has anything to do with a virus. It is you people ignorant of biological science who would seem to be the tinfoil hatters.
In a free country no laws like this should exist, so clearly we are not now a free country. the idea of jailing someone because of *something they read* is obscene. it should not need arguing against, it should not need deconstructing, it is obscene. Anyone who proposes trash like that is my enemy and should be the enemy of all decent people. We need to clear out the Westminster stables, and the phoney NGO parasites like Liberty who actively enable this crap.
See mofos, it's all actually happening. Every word you say, every word you type, monitored for thoughtcrimes at all times.
You can't say you were not warned.
Keep laughing. Keep making excuses for it. Please, keep laughing. If you keep laughing it can't hurt you.
Taxing *turnover*? Let's remember that many companies have high turnovers and are, as yet, not profitable. So you would tax companies into deeper losses. And taxing companies be diktat? IE, we will tax this company and that company, but not you, you'r eok.
How can anyone be okay with this? Open your eyes people. This is rotten.
So when Facebook or Twitter decide you're a racist, who do you appeal to? With a *court*, you have a right of appeal, and fixed definitions to unpick. What do you have with Twitter and FB?
Governments are intentionally offshoring their censorship so they can squeal "oh no, we're not censors.... " And also so they don't have to have untidy and public debates in parliament regarding which 15% of their populations they're going to gag.
How many people saw the entire media claiming Trump didn't know how to feed carp, or that he'd claimed Sweden had had a terrorist attack, when it hadn't? Totally fake. Totally mainstream generated.
Basically believe nothing unless you see it with your own eyes.
After being closely involved with a work colleague being scammed - first alerting her to it, and ccd in all bank discussions - it is VERY obvious that all these frauds are based on insiders within banks and utilities passing out personal information. Plus, I heard of another recent case that almost went as far as prosecution, then the CPS inexplicably "lost" all evidence. I think we need to accept that we now live in an extremely corrupt society. It wasn't always like this.
Every government built website to date either attracts a hundredth of predicted concurrent visitors, or a hundred times it. They either drift on, unloved, or crash under unexpected load. This one had everyone from Obama to Geldof begging people to visit it before it closed and.... it crashed at that point. Gosh. The Russians? Or SNAFU?
Very obviously, SNAFU, and yet our hopelessly Remainiac media once again weave their fake news on top of wishful thinking and pure blind fantasy.
I feel embarrassed for them, to be honest. Leavers are meant to be the thick ones?
I remember the best part of twenty years ago when I first wrote about the IWF being able to lean on ISPs to block alleged child porn content, backed by Home Office muscle but no laws, that this was the slippery end of an unregulated slope - and I was called paranoid. Anyone calling me paranoid now? The courts are saying because the *architecture* is in place, why not force people to use it?
Footie today, Wikileaks tomorrow.
" "97% of scientists agree on humanmade climate change." That's the "fact" they demand people accept - and of course it isn't a fact at all. One clue is in the term "humanmade" but the other is the failure to define which scientists, or precisely what they are agreeing to. And if we dig into the origins of this dubious stat we find it's pure cobblers. Watts Up With That has a good debunking
There's a war going on for your mind. This "vaccine" is probably the daftest weapon yet unleashed, but I imagine the nastiest ones will never be discussed. The scariest remains the MSM, which seems unable to distinguish truth from lie itself.
Worth pointing out that the Norths were adamant that the referendum would be lost because the leave campaigns weren't listening to them? They were furious with Farage, with Boris, with everyone who wasn't arguing for "Flexit". They were certain the public would only accept a detailed plan, dotted is, crossed ts, that gave a ten year roadmap for exit. They were totally wrong.
And Richard is wrong now - the flaw with Flexcit is that once you're in that halfway house YOU WILL NEVER LEAVE. If we put ourselves just slightly offshore, WE WILL NEVER LEAVE. he's a bright guy but he does not understand politics. If this is to be done it must be bloody, short, irreversible.
Don't you get it?
"The kids" will happily sign away their kidneys for free wifi. If the Eu gives it to them, everywhere, with a tiny little privacy catch.... kaboom, that becomes the new normal. There is an expectation of continual surveillance, an expectation of continual censorship. Our youth already love Big Brother.
"Would we have to run a set of ID's we trust, or is some pan-European authentication platform being formed to support this - given the mobility of people around the world."
Exactly what the Commission proposed way back when. Using state-mandated offline ID to log in with online, everywhere, as soon as you go online. No internet access other than through an EU-approved membership system.
Still think they're the good guys?
The FT is rabidly pro-EU yes, and you make a fool of yourself by accepting the line that anyone voted out of the EU to get £350m a week spent on our NHS. That might be the spin the BBC put on it, it's not the reality.
Our referendum was nothing less than a proper proletarian revolution against the bourgeoisie. You may be surprised what might happen in Ireland if the opportunity was offered.
The point folks, surely, is that Ireland should be free to manage its own tax affairs, and the EU should not be imposing diktats in a capricious and unlawful way? Retrospective legislation? Threats? This not a club I'd like to be part of. Oh, we voted out. Hurrah. Iexit next?
Are these people idiots? I can see so many problems with this law, apart from the disproportionate horror of locking people up for clicking "Submit". How is a court going to establish what the tangled nature of consent was at the time? How will they decide if consent was withdrawn, and that was clearly communicated? if the pics were posted when all was rosy, and then consent was withdrawn, does it become an offence to refuse to delete them? What if the images were posted somewhere were they CANNOT be deleted? What if the uploaded has forgotten their passwords? What if they forgot where they posted them? What if a thousand people repost?
Stupid damned idea. No doubt it will become law.
.... I don't think anyone can deny that this is the world we live in now? The left dominate the airwaves, the media, government, civil service, NGOs - they pay lipservice to free speech but woe betide you if you say anything to upset them or one of their client groups. If gays want marriage they should go through the normal democratic process to achieve that (they didn't do that here in the UK) and when they do that it is *entirely legitimate* for others to oppose them, as Eich did. Without free speech we have no democracy.
I won't be using firefox in future, not even as a development tool. Will have to figure out other approaches. I don't care to endorse the fascists or their appeasers.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
