Re: I was hoping for more snarky comedy
"/me imagines some lawsuit because the instructions did not say that"
Don't give lawyers ideas. I don't want to start seeing stickers on everything (like ladders) saying not to sleep with them.
2726 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Apr 2007
What I want to know is when will I be able to use/afford it on my computers. I've still got plenty of DDR3, and I see it's still very popular. If it's going to be in less that 2 years until DDR5 is common then it would seem that DDR4 is going to be a losing proposition unless there's a big price differential.
This was a voluntary code which some Catholic convinced Hollywood to follow for 40 years, starting in 1930. Will we see this kind of thing again? It's starting to look like it. I don't expect that standards will go back to having married couples in twin beds again, but the fact that it will likely apply to all public communion is very bad.
It's also interesting that the Production Code was done "voluntarily" in order to avoid the government stepping in.
What you the really paranoid need is for the VPN's to
1) run to endpoints in different countries
2) switch between those endpoints every minute or so.
And that's exactly what companies like proxy.sh offer with their multi-hop technology. They're not cheap, but they're good and trivial to set up. In fact I'd ague that it's a lot easier for a non-techie to set up than what's on offer in this review.
Yes, I've tried their service, but currently prefer to just use a cheap VPS as a single point VPN to browse though. That's cheap and easy for someone with a bit of tech interest, and good enough for me.
It seems a bit risky to use private information in a name that's intended to be broadcast, locally or otherwise. But yes, I've seen it on things like routers with the owner's name in the SSID.
I've always named my computers so I can access them without having to memorise IP addresses, something which will be even more needed when the more complex IPv6 becomes common. However, since my personal system uses only three letter combinations they're not going to carry useful data if they leak outside the network.
Tomato Shibby here. I've had a lot of routers and I've rarely even looked at whatever was originally installed on them. Why take a chance with written-for-profit proprietary software when there are perfectly good solutions already?
That said, most users are not going to be aware that there are better solutions or how to implement then. My theory is that they believe that the vendor knows best, and that is rarely the case with consumer routers.
That would probably work well for home users, with limited devices on their LAN and the privileges to set networking on the machine.
Sounds like you thought I meant a static IP rather than a static address for DNS. There is really no reason to have your DNS continually reset. Use the same one all the time regardless of the size of your network. Not changing is what I meant by static.
All the downvotes I got up there are presumably from people not thinking I meant static DNS address. Not sure why anybody would think that though, as it doesn't make sense.
use green energy, the company reports that its data centers in Canada are 99 per cent powered by locally sourced hydroelectric power
Also no doubt uses the freshest high quality Northern air for cooling. And I expect vitamin E will help keep my data from ageing. Seriously, I'm probably not alone in wondering what the real product is here.
To save money on proprietary updates from the software vendor. It's how the world works. Companies buy services from other companies and when it comes to software that needs to be updated daily to take market conditions into account, it's not in-house resources. So, the bottom line is that a blast furnace needs to be directly responsive to sales and market conditions. A blast furnace has a huge lag time in response so it's not like operating many other machines. I hope that answers you question.
"You know, something in the $100k a year for half a days "work" a week."
You can't be serious. Although the hours are longer, truck drivers and miners make that much. Surely he'd expect an executive level salary, even for half days. But then again, we're talking USA with it's, soon to be even more, depressed economy. (Disclaimer, I'm in Canada)
In fact I think some of the focus should be shifted. As the article points out:
the underlying issue remains the DNS itself
The current DNS problems seem almost hopeless and not enough effort is put into solving them. Security holes in BIND are trivial compared to issues with the DNS system itself which are still going to facilitate abuse on the grand level that we've been seeing lately.
We don't need another law. There's too many already. What we need is more education so people can learn to be critical of everything they hear.
Actually I think that the general populace gained an intelligence point during this election. Not only did many see that the polls are not as competent as had been thought, but people are starting to learn that much of the press cannot be trusted and are actually reprinting government propaganda. That's a step in the right direction and something which cannot be achieved with a law.
Absolutes are always a myth. However, the internet has never reached the level of reliability that would normally be expected from something that we call infrastructure. Unfortunately with constant development and sales demanding new things be implemented before they can reasonably be considered out of beta, things don't look like they're going to improve any time soon. Microsoft knows this.
There is something to be said for encouraging investment in startups, but we must not forget that there is money in the VC business even when a startup fails. Could this suggestion end up making the VC business more profitable without startups actually gaining much ground? I note that liquidation preference is designed to protect an investor's capital.
This thread is a couple days old, but in case anybody is still watching, there is a patch being pushed out right now and most people should have it automatically already. Also, here is a description of the problem:
* It looks like the vulnerability was in Firefox's SVG animation, so the exploit does not work unless you have both svg and javascript enabled. The "high" setting of Tor Browser's security slider disables both of these pieces of the browser.
So, it wasn't very serious in the first place.
there have only been two deaths in the UK from terrorist attacks in the last 11 years
And yet the effect of "terrorism" has been vastly broader than that.
Internet companies which may once have seen themselves as neutral carriers of content are coming to understand that it is incumbent on them also to edit that content: but it is a role with which not all are comfortable, and the process is fraught with difficulty.
The practice and acceptance of censorship has been pushed beyond anything that is even remotely acceptable in a civilised society. The loss of freedom due to the opportunistic actions of governments is unacceptable.